Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

KMS states are invariant under their dynamics

Statement

Let ω be a β-KMS state for a strongly continuous group αt as in Physical-time KMS strip equilibrium condition, with b=βℏ>0. Then

ω(αt(B))=ω(B)(B∈A, t∈R).

Thus invariance is a consequence of the full bounded-strip KMS condition; it is not an extra clause in the definition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A unital C∗-algebra A, a strongly continuous one-parameter group αt of unital ∗-automorphisms, β>0, ℏ>0, and a β-KMS state ω.

[F1]

Physical-time KMS strip equilibrium condition: for every A,B∈A there is a bounded function FA,B continuous on Sb={z:0≤Im⁡z≤b}, holomorphic inside, with lower boundary ω(Aαt(B)) and upper boundary ω(αt(B)A).

[F2]

Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain: a holomorphic scalar function on an open set has zero integral around every filled triangle contained in that set.

[F3]

Morera's theorem: vanishing triangle integrals characterize holomorphy among continuous functions: a continuous scalar function on an open set is holomorphic if its integral around every contained filled triangle is zero.

[F4]

Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant: every bounded entire scalar function on C is constant.

Proof

technique · use the KMS condition with the identity observable, glue copies of its strip function periodically, and prove analyticity across the seams by Morera's theorem

Given: [F1]–[F4], b=βℏ>0, and an arbitrary B∈A.

1.1F1given

Let F:=FI,B be the strip function from [F1]. Since every αt is unital, its two boundary values coincide: F(t)=ω(αt(B))=F(t+ib) for every t∈R. Denote this common continuous function of t by g(t).

2.1F1step 1.1construct

For each integer k, define F~(t+iy):=F(t+i(y−kb)) when kb≤y≤(k+1)b. At a shared seam the lower and upper definitions agree by step 1.1, so the definition is single-valued. It is continuous on each closed translated strip and across every seam, is ib-periodic, and is bounded on C by the bound for F on Sb. It is holomorphic away from the horizontal seams because there it is a translate of F on its open strip.

3.1F2step 2.1construct

Fix a point on a seam and choose a disk about it that meets no other seam. Let T be any filled triangle in this disk. If T crosses the seam, cut it along that horizontal line; the resulting at most two polygons can each be triangulated by joining one vertex to the other vertices. Every resulting small triangle lies in one of the two closed half-disks. If a small triangle touches the seam, translate it a distance ϵ>0 into that half's open strip; for all sufficiently small ϵ, its translate remains inside that strip and the translated contour integral is zero by [F2]. Uniform continuity of F~ on a compact neighborhood of the original contour implies the translated integrals converge to the original integral as ϵ↓0. Hence each small triangle has zero integral. Summing their boundary integrals cancels shared edges with opposite orientations and yields ∫∂TF~(z) dz=0. Triangles wholly on one side also have zero integral by [F2].

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1

Step 3.1 applies to every triangle in the disk. The function F~ is continuous there by step 2.1, so [F3] makes it holomorphic across the seam in that disk. Away from seams it was already holomorphic by step 2.1; since the point on the seam was arbitrary, F~ is entire on C.

5.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1∎

Step 2.1 gives a global bound on F~, so [F4] makes it constant. Its restriction to the real axis is g(t)=ω(αt(B)) by step 1.1, and at t=0 this is ω(B). Therefore ω(αt(B))=ω(B) for every real t. Since B was arbitrary, ω is invariant.

Remarks

The strip tiling below is explanatory only. Each adjacent strip is the translate by ib; the equality of edge values, not the drawing, is what makes the periodic extension single-valued.

diagram failed to render:
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.85]
  \draw[->] (-3.5,0) -- (3.5,0) node[right] {$\operatorname{Re}z$};
  \draw[->] (-3,0) -- (-3,3.5) node[above] {$\operatorname{Im}z$};
  \draw (-3,0) rectangle (3,1);
  \draw (-3,1) rectangle (3,2);
  \draw (-3,2) rectangle (3,3);
  \node at (0,0.5) {$F(z)$};
  \node at (0,1.5) {$F(z-ib)$};
  \node at (0,2.5) {$F(z-2ib)$};
  \node[left] at (-3,1) {$g(t)$};
  \node[left] at (-3,2) {$g(t)$};
  \node[right] at (3.2,1) {$ib$};
  \node[right] at (3.2,2) {$2ib$};
\end{tikzpicture}

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources