How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
KMS states are invariant under their dynamics
Statement
Let be a -KMS state for a strongly continuous group as in Physical-time KMS strip equilibrium condition, with . Then
Thus invariance is a consequence of the full bounded-strip KMS condition; it is not an extra clause in the definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital C-algebra , a strongly continuous one-parameter group of unital -automorphisms, , , and a -KMS state .
Physical-time KMS strip equilibrium condition: for every there is a bounded function continuous on , holomorphic inside, with lower boundary and upper boundary .
Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain: a holomorphic scalar function on an open set has zero integral around every filled triangle contained in that set.
Morera's theorem: vanishing triangle integrals characterize holomorphy among continuous functions: a continuous scalar function on an open set is holomorphic if its integral around every contained filled triangle is zero.
Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant: every bounded entire scalar function on is constant.
Proof
Given: [F1]–[F4], , and an arbitrary .
Let be the strip function from [F1]. Since every is unital, its two boundary values coincide: for every . Denote this common continuous function of by .
For each integer , define when . At a shared seam the lower and upper definitions agree by step 1.1, so the definition is single-valued. It is continuous on each closed translated strip and across every seam, is -periodic, and is bounded on by the bound for on . It is holomorphic away from the horizontal seams because there it is a translate of on its open strip.
Fix a point on a seam and choose a disk about it that meets no other seam. Let be any filled triangle in this disk. If crosses the seam, cut it along that horizontal line; the resulting at most two polygons can each be triangulated by joining one vertex to the other vertices. Every resulting small triangle lies in one of the two closed half-disks. If a small triangle touches the seam, translate it a distance into that half's open strip; for all sufficiently small , its translate remains inside that strip and the translated contour integral is zero by [F2]. Uniform continuity of on a compact neighborhood of the original contour implies the translated integrals converge to the original integral as . Hence each small triangle has zero integral. Summing their boundary integrals cancels shared edges with opposite orientations and yields . Triangles wholly on one side also have zero integral by [F2].
Step 3.1 applies to every triangle in the disk. The function is continuous there by step 2.1, so [F3] makes it holomorphic across the seam in that disk. Away from seams it was already holomorphic by step 2.1; since the point on the seam was arbitrary, is entire on .
Step 2.1 gives a global bound on , so [F4] makes it constant. Its restriction to the real axis is by step 1.1, and at this is . Therefore for every real . Since was arbitrary, is invariant.
Remarks
The strip tiling below is explanatory only. Each adjacent strip is the translate by ; the equality of edge values, not the drawing, is what makes the periodic extension single-valued.
diagram failed to render:
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.85]
\draw[->] (-3.5,0) -- (3.5,0) node[right] {$\operatorname{Re}z$};
\draw[->] (-3,0) -- (-3,3.5) node[above] {$\operatorname{Im}z$};
\draw (-3,0) rectangle (3,1);
\draw (-3,1) rectangle (3,2);
\draw (-3,2) rectangle (3,3);
\node at (0,0.5) {$F(z)$};
\node at (0,1.5) {$F(z-ib)$};
\node at (0,2.5) {$F(z-2ib)$};
\node[left] at (-3,1) {$g(t)$};
\node[left] at (-3,2) {$g(t)$};
\node[right] at (3.2,1) {$ib$};
\node[right] at (3.2,2) {$2ib$};
\end{tikzpicture}Depends on
Physical-time KMS strip equilibrium condition
Bounded KMS strip norm and zero-edge uniqueness
Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain
Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant
Morera's theorem: vanishing triangle integrals characterize holomorphy among continuous functions