Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded increasing positive nets have strong suprema

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let H be a complex Hilbert space and M⊆B(H) a concrete von Neumann algebra. Let I be a nonempty directed set, and let (xi)i∈I be a net in M such that each xi is positive, xi≤xj whenever i≤j, and ∥xi∥≤C for some finite C≥0. Here A≤B means that A,B are self-adjoint and ⟨Aξ,ξ⟩≤⟨Bξ,ξ⟩ for every ξ∈H. Then the net has a least upper bound x=sup⁡ixi in M+, and xi→x in the strong operator topology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: [A1], a complex Hilbert space H, a concrete von Neumann algebra M⊆B(H), a nonempty directed set I, and the increasing positive net of the Statement.

[A1]

Assume Choice, the hypothesis for the weak-closure/double-commutant interface in Concrete von Neumann algebra and faithful vector and The Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

M=M′′ and commutants are weak-operator closed, so M is weak-operator closed (Concrete von Neumann algebra and faithful vector, Von Neumann algebras and commutants).

[F2]

Weak-operator convergence is convergence of every matrix coefficient (Strong and weak operator topologies).

[F3]

A bounded sesquilinear form on H is represented by a unique bounded operator, by applying Riesz representation to one argument (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F4] and the net in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4givenconstruct

For ξ∈H, the real numbers qi(ξ):=⟨xiξ,ξ⟩ increase and satisfy 0≤qi(ξ)≤C∥ξ∥2. Define q(ξ):=sup⁡i∈Iqi(ξ). For each i, the complex polarization identity gives ⟨xiξ,η⟩=14∑k=03ikqi(ξ+ikη). Each term on the right converges as i increases, so the left-hand side converges for every ξ,η. Let b(ξ,η) be its limit. The forms ⟨xiξ,η⟩ are sesquilinear and uniformly bounded by C∥ξ∥∥η∥, so their pointwise limit b is sesquilinear with the same bound. For fixed ξ, Riesz representation applied to η↦b(ξ,η)‾ gives a unique vector xξ with b(ξ,η)=⟨xξ,η⟩. Sesquilinearity and uniqueness make ξ↦xξ linear, and the bound gives ∥xξ∥≤C∥ξ∥; thus x∈B(H) and ∥x∥≤C. Since each xi is self-adjoint, b(ξ,η)=b(η,ξ)‾, hence ⟨xξ,η⟩=⟨ξ,xη⟩ and x=x∗. Also ⟨xξ,ξ⟩=q(ξ)≥0, so x is positive. By [F2], xi→x weakly. Since M is weakly closed by [F1], x∈M.

2.1step 1.1given

For every ξ, qi(ξ)≤q(ξ)=⟨xξ,ξ⟩, so xi≤x. If y∈M+ is any other upper bound, then qi(ξ)≤⟨yξ,ξ⟩ for every i,ξ; taking the supremum over i gives ⟨xξ,ξ⟩≤⟨yξ,ξ⟩ for every ξ, hence x≤y. Thus x=sup⁡ixi in M+.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

If H={0}, strong convergence is immediate. Otherwise fix ξ∈H and put Di=x−xi. Then 0≤Di≤x≤CI and ⟨Diξ,ξ⟩=q(ξ)−qi(ξ)→0. Positivity gives the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the form (α,β)↦⟨Diα,β⟩: applying positivity to ξ+zη for arbitrary z∈C yields the nonnegative quantity u+2Re⁡(z‾a)+∣z∣2v, where u=⟨Diξ,ξ⟩, a=⟨Diξ,η⟩, and v=⟨Diη,η⟩. If v>0, taking z=−a/v gives ∣a∣2≤uv. If v=0 and a≠0, taking z=−ta for sufficiently large real t>0 makes the quantity negative; hence a=0 and the same inequality holds. Therefore ∣⟨Diξ,η⟩∣2≤⟨Diξ,ξ⟩⟨Diη,η⟩≤C∥η∥2⟨Diξ,ξ⟩. Taking the supremum over unit η gives ∥Diξ∥2≤C⟨Diξ,ξ⟩→0. Therefore ∥(xi−x)ξ∥→0 for every ξ, which is strong-operator convergence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources