Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The integral third Stiefel–Whitney classes of oriented tangent and normal bundles agree when the restricted ambient second class vanishes

Statement

Assume full AC. Let Q and Y be finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifolds without boundary, and let i:Q↪Y be a smooth embedding. Give Y a smooth Riemannian metric and let ν=(i∗TY)/TQ be the real normal bundle, identified with the orthogonal complement of TQ in i∗TY. Orient TQ and ν, and assume w1(TQ)=w1(ν)=0,w2(i∗TY)=0. Define W3(E):=β~2(w2(E))∈H3(Q;Z) for an oriented real bundle E, where β~2 is the integral Bockstein of 0→Z→2Z→F2→0. Then W3(TQ)=W3(ν).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the oriented bundles TQ,ν, their direct-sum identification with i∗TY, and w2(i∗TY)=0.

[F1]

Whitney sum formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes states w(E⊕F)=w(E)w(F) over the admissible bases of its statement.

[F2]

The first Stiefel–Whitney class classifies orientability states that an oriented numerable real bundle has w1=0; here the vanishing is also explicitly assumed.

[F3]

Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation fixes the total classes, their degrees, and the rank conventions.

[F4]

Bockstein connecting operation defines β~2 from the displayed short exact coefficient sequence, and The Bockstein is independent of lift and representative proves that it is a well-defined function on cohomology classes.

[F5]

A finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold is paracompact Hausdorff, has CW homotopy type, and its finite-rank smooth vector bundles are numerable. Thus the base and bundle hypotheses of [F1] apply to Q (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type).

Proof

Given: The bundle decomposition and vanishing classes above.

1.1F1F2F3F5givenalgebra

The base hypotheses of [F1] hold by [F5]. The degree-two part of the Whitney formula [F1] is w2(i∗TY)=w2(TQ)+w1(TQ)w1(ν)+w2(ν). Using the two orientation vanishings and w2(i∗TY)=0 gives w2(TQ)+w2(ν)=0 in H2(Q;F2). Since this coefficient group has characteristic two, w2(TQ)=w2(ν).

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

Apply the same function β~2 of [F4] to the equal cohomology classes in step 1.1. By the definition of W3, the resulting equality is W3(TQ)=W3(ν) in H3(Q;Z).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources