Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Derivative concentration produces a finite-energy plane or half-plane bubble

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Use a compact target (X,g), fixed compact totally real boundary submanifolds, and smooth strip equations Jn with uniform bounds of every order, fixed boundary complex structures, and local C∞ convergence to J∞. Let un:R×[0,1]→X be smooth solutions of (un)s+Jn(s,t,un)(un)t=0, with un(s,j)∈Lj for j=0,1, where Lj is the fixed boundary submanifold at edge j. Suppose their energies are at most E0. Suppose pn→p in the strip, including its boundary, and ∣dun(pn)∣g→∞.

After taking a subsequence, translations and positive conformal dilations about points tending to p give a nonconstant smooth map v on either C or the closed upper half-plane, satisfying the autonomous equation vs+J∞(p,v)vt=0, with energy at most E0. In the half-plane case its real-axis boundary lies in the boundary submanifold at p. Its derivative has norm one at some finite point, and its derivative norm is at most two everywhere. There is a constant ℏ>0 depending only on the uniform geometric data, independent of the sequence, such that E(v)≥ℏ.

At the upper strip edge an orientation-preserving half-plane coordinate is used. No extension of v over infinity, sphere or disk compactification, energy identity, or bubble-tree statement is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the compact geometric data and families, bounded-energy solutions, and derivative concentration in the statement.

[F1]

The local interior and boundary small-energy gradient estimates are Interior small-energy gradient control for almost complex maps and Boundary small-energy gradient control along a compact totally real submanifold, with uniform comparison to the fixed metric g.

[F2]

Uniform coordinate C1 bounds give all local derivative bounds by Local higher derivative bounds for almost complex maps with bounded first derivative. The explicit target-chart construction and countable dense-point and derivative diagonal extractions are proved in Smooth strip convergence outside finitely many energy concentration points.

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Choose a flat source coordinate about p, centered there, with domain a disk or an upper half-disk. At the lower strip edge use the usual coordinate; at the upper edge use z↦i−z, so both coordinates are orientation preserving and preserve the form of the equation. Write fn=∣dun∣g in this coordinate and Mn=fn(pn)→∞. After a tail, choose radii rn=∣pn−p∣+Mn−1 smaller than a fixed coordinate radius. Then rn→0, ∣pn−p∣/rn→0, and rnMn→∞. On the compact disk or half-disk of radius rn maximize (rn−∣z∣)fn(z), and let qn be a maximum point. Put λn=fn(qn) and δn=(rn−∣qn∣)/2. The maximum is at least (rn−∣pn∣)Mn, so λnδn→∞, and in particular λn→∞. On Bδn(qn) intersected with the physical source half-plane, maximality gives fn≤2λn. All selected points tend to p.

2.1step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

If p is interior, rescale by z↦qn+z/λn. The domains contain disks about zero of radii λnδn→∞; the rescaled derivatives are at most two there and have norm one at zero. If p is a boundary point, write hn=λnIm⁡qn≥0. Pass either to hn→∞ or to a bounded sequence converging to h≥0. In the first case use the same center rescaling; its boundary recedes to height −hn, so the limit domain is the plane. In the second case rescale about the boundary foot Re⁡qn, obtaining upper half-plane domains on which the derivative bound holds on expanding disks centered at ihn. Every fixed compact upper-half-plane set eventually lies in these disks, and the derivative norm is one at ihn. The boundary values remain on the original fixed submanifold. In all cases the rescaled almost complex structures converge locally smoothly to J∗(x)=J∞(p,x): each positive source derivative gains a factor λn−1 and the unscaled source points tend to p.

3.1F2step 2.1construct

These rescaled maps have a subsequence converging smoothly on compact subsets of their limiting plane or half-plane. Here the details of [F2] apply without removing points: the global derivative bound two already gives local equicontinuity everywhere. Compact target finite nets and a countable dense subset of the limiting domain give a locally uniform subsequence. In a small disk about each limiting source point choose the fixed target coordinates of [F2], normalizing J∗ to i at the center; at boundary points use its explicit totally real chart. Locally uniform convergence and smooth coefficient convergence then give the coefficient bound ∥J−i∥≤1/2 and uniform coordinate C1 bounds on a smaller fixed patch. The bootstrap in [F2] gives bounds of every order there. Its countable derivative diagonal construction yields local C∞ convergence on an exhaustion of the entire limiting domain, including boundary derivatives. Thus no concentration point remains in this selected scale.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Let v be the limit. The equation and boundary condition pass to the limit. Its derivative norm is one at zero in the plane-center case, and at ih in the bounded-height case: convergence is C1 on a fixed compact neighborhood of those moving points. Its derivative norm is at most two by the same convergence, so it is nonconstant. A translation and dilation of a two-dimensional source preserves Dirichlet energy, since the squared derivative scaling cancels the area scaling. Therefore every compact-region energy of the rescaled maps is at most E0, and passage to the smooth limit followed by exhaustion gives E(v)≤E0.

5.1F1step 4.1constructalgebra∎

Finally choose fixed constants r∗>0, ε∗>0, and C∗>0 giving the interior center and boundary half-radius supremum estimates of [F1] in the metric g, uniformly for every possible autonomous limit J∗. This is possible from the uniform coefficient bounds and the two fixed boundary structures; decrease r∗ below 1/4 if necessary. If a derivative-norm-one point of v in the plane, or in the half-plane at height at least r∗/4, is considered, apply the interior estimate on a radius-r∗/8 disk about it. If its half-plane height is below r∗/4, apply the boundary supremum estimate on the radius-r∗ half-disk centered at its boundary foot. If total energy is at least ε∗ there is already a positive lower bound. Otherwise the relevant small-energy estimate gives 1≤64C∗r∗2E(v). Consequently ℏ=min⁡{ε∗,r∗2/(64C∗)}>0 is a uniform lower bound for the energy of this nonconstant bubble. This proves exactly the asserted plane or half-plane result, without filling its point at infinity.

Source history

The former metadata cited McDuff–Salamon's book and Ozsváth–Szabó §10. Their complete cited ranges were not read in this repair; neither is used as source-coverage evidence. The current precise alternate references above were actually read, while every analytic implication still uses the stated local suppliers.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources