Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Soft rescaling captures an isolated interior energy atom

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Fix compact (X,g) and smooth almost complex families Jn(z,x) on B1×X, converging smoothly locally to J∞ and having uniform coefficient bounds on smaller closed disks. Let smooth solutions un:B1→X have uniformly bounded energy and converge smoothly locally on B1∖{0} to a solution u smooth at 0. Suppose the limits of Eg(un;Br) exist for small r>0 and their limit as r↓0 is m>0.

There is a uniform constant h>0 depending only on these geometric bounds such that m≥h and, after a subsequence, there are centers zn→0, scales ρn→0, an autonomous J∞(0,⋅)-holomorphic sphere v, a finite set Z⊂C, and positive masses mz for z∈Z, satisfying:

  • vn(w)=un(zn+ρnw), with Eg(vn;B1)=m−h/2, converges smoothly locally on C∖Z to v, which may be constant;
  • lim⁡R→∞lim⁡nEg(vn;BR)=m=Eg(v)+∑z∈Zmz, and v(∞)=u(0);
  • each mz is the energy atom of vn at z, and h≤mz≤m−h;
  • if v is constant, then ∣Z∣≥2.

The separate gradient-normalized rescaling used to prove m≥h has derivative norm one at its normalization point and norm at most two on its expanding domains; that normalization is not asserted for v. The constant h can be chosen uniformly for subsequent rescalings of these data. A constant sphere therefore has at least three attachment points when infinity is included. This is a single actual rescaling step, not an assumed compactification theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact geometric bounds, actual equation, smooth convergence off zero, filled limit, and positive energy atom in the statement.

[F1]

The local proof of Smooth strip convergence outside finitely many energy concentration points extracts smooth limits off finitely many concentration points by countable energy limits, target-global epsilon estimates, actual chart bootstrap and countable diagonals. Its proof is local in source disks and thus applies on an exhaustion by such disks as detailed below.

[F2]

Derivative concentration produces a finite-energy plane or half-plane bubble gives the local distance-weighted maximum and normalized rescaling construction. Finite-energy interior and totally real boundary puncture removability fills its finite-energy plane bubbles to spheres and fills finite-energy punctures of the limiting maps.

[F3]

Small local energy forces cylinder neck collapse proves actual energy and image-diameter collapse on buffered cylindrical annuli whose local energies and explicit source variation are sufficiently small.

Proof

1.1F2F3givenconstructalgebra

We fix a positive quantum once. The normalized bubble in [F2] has derivative norm one at a point and finite energy. The actual interior epsilon estimate at a fixed-radius disk about that point bounds its energy below by a positive constant h0, independent of rescaling. Also every nonconstant autonomous sphere for a limiting target structure has energy at least h0 after possibly decreasing h0: choose a finite planar point with nonzero derivative, translate and dilate its source to make that norm one, and apply the same epsilon estimate. That estimate needs no global derivative bound for this lower bound; if its small-energy threshold fails it already supplies a positive lower bound. The structures J∞(0,x) and their descendants retain the same uniform target bounds, so this quantum is uniform. Choose h≤h0 also smaller than one eighth of the local-energy threshold in [F3].

1.2givenconstructalgebra

Write M(r)=lim⁡nEg(un;Br). Smooth convergence on compact annuli gives M(r)−M(r′)=Eg(u;Br∖Br′) for 0<r′<r in the stated range. Letting r′↓0 yields M(r)=m+Eg(u;Br). In particular it is continuous in r. For any centers zn→0, the inclusions Br−ϵ⊂Br(zn)⊂Br+ϵ for large n and then ϵ↓0 give lim⁡nEg(un;Br(zn))=m+Eg(u;Br). The same sandwich proves convergence on moving annuli of fixed positive radii to their u energies. In particular energies of any shrinking disks have limsup at most m, by containment in arbitrarily small fixed disks.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2constructalgebra

Let Mn=max⁡B1/2‾∣dun∣g and choose a maximizing point zn. After a subsequence Mn→∞ and zn→0. Otherwise a subsequence bounded on B1/2, together with [F1], would converge smoothly also at zero, forcing its atom mass to vanish; smooth convergence away from zero forces any unbounded maximizing sequence toward zero. The local rescaling construction in [F2] produces a normalized plane bubble at zero: choose radii rn→0 with rnMn→∞ and ∣zn∣/rn→0, maximize (rn−∣z∣)∣dun(z)∣, and rescale by the gradient at that maximum. On expanding disks the rescaled derivative is at most two and equals one at the center; [F1] gives a smooth nonconstant plane limit. Its energy is at most m, because every fixed rescaled disk lies in an original disk shrinking to zero and energies of any fixed original disk tend to m+Eg(u;Br) by the established energy identity. By step 1.1 its energy is at least h, proving m≥h.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2constructalgebra

Put μ=m−h/2>0. For each large n let ρn be the smallest radius with Eg(un;Bρn(zn))=μ, restricting to a small fixed disk contained in B1. Such a radius exists: radius-zero energy is zero, energy varies continuously with radius, and step 1.2 makes the energy at any sufficiently small fixed radius eventually greater than μ. The first solution is attained by continuity on a compact interval, so no strict monotonicity or uniqueness of all solutions is needed. The same fixed-radius argument gives ρn→0. Define vn(w)=un(zn+ρnw). Its domains contain each fixed planar disk eventually and its coefficient converges smoothly there to J∞(0,x). Its energy on the unit disk is exactly μ.

4.1F1step 3.1constructalgebra

Apply the local extraction argument of [F1] to vn on an exhaustion of C. Explicitly, diagonally extract limits of energies on a countable basis of disks and of total energies on exhaustion disks. Points at which every such neighborhood has limiting energy at least the epsilon threshold form a finite set: disjoint neighborhoods about any finite selection have total energy bounded by the original global bound, so their number is uniformly bounded. Away from that finite set the actual epsilon estimates give uniform first derivatives on smaller patches; compact target finite nets and a countable dense source set give local uniform convergence, and the actual local bootstrap then gives all derivative bounds and a countable smooth diagonal limit. Remove any exceptional point where a further subsequence has bounded gradients on one neighborhood, repeating at most finitely many times. Thus the remaining finite set Z consists only of genuine gradient blowup points, and vn→v smoothly on compact subsets of C∖Z. Further countable extraction gives energy limits on small rational-radius disks about each z∈Z.

4.2F3step 1.2step 3.1constructalgebra

We now prove that no energy escaped at infinity in this rescaling. Fix a small original radius d>0. By step 1.2 and step 3.1, the annulus An={ρn<∣z−zn∣<d} has limiting energy h/2+Eg(u;Bd). Choose d small enough that this is below half the neck threshold of [F3]; it remains below that threshold for all large n. Write z=zn+eσ+iτ on An. This is a holomorphic cylinder coordinate with period 2π, and conformal invariance preserves energy. Its explicit source derivatives of Jn(zn+eσ+iτ,x) are bounded by Cd, uniformly in n, so are below the [F3] variation threshold after reducing d. Uniform coefficient bounds of the needed orders persist. Every fixed-radius cylindrical patch has energy bounded by the total annulus energy. Apply [F3] after removing a unit buffer at each end. For R≥e2 and all large n it gives Eg(un;Bd/R(zn)∖BRρn(zn))≤CR−c,diam⁡gun(Bd/R(zn)∖BRρn(zn)‾)≤CR−c/2, with constants independent of d,R,n in this range.

5.1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 4.1constructalgebra

Each z∈Z has an atom mz≥h. To see this, repeat the local distance-weighted rescaling construction of step 2.1 in a small disk about that point. Its smooth normalized plane bubble has energy at least h by step 1.1 and at most the atom mass by the disk containment argument of step 1.2. The limit v has finite energy on C∖Z by exhaustion and the global bound. By [F2] it extends smoothly across the finitely many points of Z and across infinity, hence is an autonomous holomorphic sphere. Annular smooth convergence and this extension show that energy limits on all small disks about each z exist, not just rational ones, by the continuity/sandwich argument of step 1.2. This defines each mz independently of the chosen small radii.

5.2step 1.2step 4.1step 4.2algebra

By the moving fixed-annulus convergence of step 1.2, the energy of Bd(zn)∖Bd/R(zn) tends to Eg(u;Bd∖Bd/R). Hence step 4.2 gives, for every large R, m−CR−c≤lim inf⁡nEg(vn;BR)≤lim sup⁡nEg(vn;BR)≤m+Eg(u;Bd). The upper bound follows just by inclusion in Bd(zn). Letting d↓0 proves the upper bound m; the lower bound is independent of d. A further countable radius diagonal, extended to other radii by the smooth annular convergence away Z, provides the indicated inner limits. The only remaining possible radii are the finitely many ∣z∣ for z∈Z; extract their bounded energy sequences as well, so all fixed-radius inner limits exist. Then R→∞ proves lim⁡R→∞lim⁡nEg(vn;BR)=m. This is the actual energy capture statement.

6.1step 1.2step 5.1step 5.2algebra

Choose R larger than all ∣z∣ for z∈Z and avoiding any exceptional circle if needed. Partition BR into disjoint small disks about these points and their complement. Smooth convergence gives the complement energy, while the disk energies equal their atom masses plus the energy of the filled smooth limit, by the same annulus argument as step 1.2. Shrinking their radii and then letting R→∞ in step 5.2 yields Eg(v)+∑z∈Zmz=m. All sums are finite, so no exchange of an uncontrolled infinite sum with a limit occurs.

6.2step 5.1step 4.2algebra

The diameter estimate in step 4.2 proves the node connection. For fixed large R outside Z, compare the two radial points zn+d/R and zn+Rρn in that closed annulus. Passage to n→∞ gives dg(u(d/R),v(R))≤CR−c/2. First let d↓0 using the filled original limit and then let R→∞ using the filled limit v(∞) from step 5.1. The inequality gives u(0)=v(∞). This proves actual connection of the two components, not merely equality of total energies.

7.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra

If v is nonconstant, step 1.1 and step 6.1 give Eg(v)≥h and hence mz≤m−h for every child. Suppose v is constant. Then Z is nonempty by step 6.1. At any z∈Z there are nearby points with ∣dvn∣→∞. The original center zn maximizes ∣dun∣ on B1/2, and all fixed rescaled compact sets eventually lie there. Thus ∣dvn(0)∣ is at least these diverging values, so 0∈Z. But Eg(vn;B1)=μ=m−h/2 implies m0≤μ<m. If Z had only this one point, step 6.1 would give m0=m, a contradiction. Therefore ∣Z∣≥2; since each child mass is at least h, every child is at most m−h in this case as well. This proves the stability and energy-drop assertions.

8.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 7.1construct∎

All lower bounds, epsilon thresholds and neck constants used above depend only on compact target and uniform coefficient bounds. Subsequent rescalings have autonomous limits among the same pointwise structures and their explicit source derivatives decrease, so the same smaller h remains valid. The construction involved finitely many choices of centers at each stage and countable extractions only; it therefore stays within Countable Choice. This completes the single soft-rescaling step with every claimed mass, limit and node property.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources