Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Planck integrals from Fourier Parseval

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. The following improper integrals converge and have the exact values ∫0∞x3ex−1 dx=π415,∫0∞x2[−log⁡(1−e−x)] dx=π445.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and the coordinate characters on the normalized one-dimensional torus T=R/Z.

[A1]

All integrals in the Statement and Proof are nonnegative Lebesgue integrals on (0,∞) with respect to one-dimensional Lebesgue measure, as defined in [F4]. The integrands and partial sums below are continuous, hence Borel measurable.

[F1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): every countable sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function; this is the exact set-theoretic assumption in the Fourier supplier.

[F2]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: under Countable Choice, the characters en(y)=e2πiny form an orthonormal basis of L2(T) and Parseval gives ∥F∥22=∑n∈Z∣F^(n)∣2.

[F3]

Monotone convergence for the integral, Statement: if nonnegative measurable functions increase pointwise to f on a measure space, their integrals increase to ∫f.

[F4]

The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, Definition: the integral of a nonnegative measurable function is the supremum of the integrals of its nonnegative simple minorants.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

On [−12,12] define the continuous periodic representative F(y)=(2πy)2. Its normalized Fourier coefficients are cn=(2π)−1∫−ππx2e−inx dx after the change x=2πy. Direct integration gives c0=π2/3; for n≠0, two integrations by parts give cn=2(−1)n/n2 because the first boundary term cancels at x=±π and ∫−ππe−inx dx=0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The normalized squared norm is (2π)−1∫−ππx4 dx=π4/5. Under the stated Countable Choice assumption [F1], Parseval [F2] therefore gives π4/5=∣c0∣2+∑n≠0∣cn∣2=π4/9+8∑n=1∞n−4, whence ∑n=1∞n−4=π4/90.

3.1A1F3F4step 2.1algebra

For m≥1 and p=0,1,2,3, put Jp(m)=∫0∞xpe−mx dx. Direct integration gives J0(m)=1/m; integration by parts on [0,R] and then R→∞ gives Jp(m)=pJp−1(m)/m, since Rpe−mR→0 (for example, emR≥(mR)p+1/(p+1)!). Hence J3(m)=6/m4 and J2(m)=2/m3. The finite geometric identity and its limit give (ex−1)−1=∑m≥1e−mx for x>0. The partial sums x3∑m≤Ne−mx are nonnegative measurable and increase pointwise; the monotone-convergence theorem [F3] for the integral defined in [F4] gives the first integral as ∑m≥1J3(m)=6∑m≥1m−4=π4/15.

4.1A1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

For 0<z<1, the geometric series is uniformly convergent on [0,z], so integrating its partial sums gives −log⁡(1−z)=∑m≥1zm/m. At z=e−x the nonnegative partial sums x2∑m≤Ne−mx/m increase pointwise to the second integrand. Applying [F3] to the integral defined in [F4] and using step 3.1 gives its integral as ∑m≥1J2(m)/m=2∑m≥1m−4=π4/45. The integral ratio is therefore 1/3.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources