Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Extremal dyonic RN throat as a local scaled limit

Statement

Let m>0 and qe,qm∈R be length parameters with qe2+qm2=m2, set the RN mass parameter M=m, and use the exact dyonic RN metric and two-form on r>m. For each dimensionless λ>0, define Φλ(T,R,ω)=(x0=T/λ, r=m+λR, ω) on D=RT×(0,∞)R×S2. Then

gλ:=Φλ∗g=−R2(m+λR)2 dT2+(m+λR)2R2 dR2+(m+λR)2γS2,Fλ:=Φλ∗F=−qe(m+λR)2 dT∧dR+qmωS2.

As λ↓0, the pair converges with every coordinate derivative uniformly on each compact subset of D to

g0=−R2m2 dT2+m2R2 dR2+m2γS2,F0=−qem2 dT∧dR+qmωS2.

Here x0,r,T,R,m,qe,qm have length units, λ is dimensionless, and γS2,ωS2 are the unit round metric and outward area form. “Convergence with every coordinate derivative uniformly on compact subsets” means that, in a finite smooth atlas, every coordinate derivative of each tensor coefficient converges uniformly on each compact subset. The convergence is only on R>0: it asserts neither extension through R=0, uniform control over the whole original exterior, nor a decoupled theory. In the positive-electric subcase qe=m, qm=0, the displayed pullbacks agree exactly with the inherited near-horizon theorem's field and metric formulas.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact dyonic RN datum with M=m>0, qe2+qm2=m2, a dimensionless λ>0, and R>0.

[F1]

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains: on f≠0, g=−f(dx0)2+f−1dr2+r2γS2 and F=−qer−2dx0∧dr+qmωS2, where f=1−2M/r+(qe2+qm2)/r2.

[F2]

Extremal RN to Bertotti-Robinson in C-infinity local scaling: only for M=qe=L>0, qm=0, the map Φλ(T,R,ω)=(x0=T/λ,r=L+λR,ω) has the stated exact pullbacks and Cloc∞ limit on R>0. The local argument below extends the explicit coordinate calculation to the dyonic charge pair; [F2] is used only in its exact positive-electric case.

[A1]

m>0, λ>0, and R>0, so r=m+λR>m and m+λR≥m>0. The extremality identity is qe2+qm2=m2.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1algebraconstruct

The extremality identity gives f(r)=(1−m/r)2=λ2R2/(m+λR)2. The map Φλ is a diffeomorphism from D onto Rx0×(m,∞)r×S2, with inverse T=λx0, R=(r−m)/λ. Its differentials satisfy dx0=dT/λ and dr=λdR. Substitution in [F1] gives the displayed gλ.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

The same pullback differentials give dx0∧dr=(dT/λ)∧(λdR)=dT∧dR; substituting r=m+λR in the two-form of [F1] gives the displayed Fλ.

3.1givenA1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Fix a compact K⊂D and choose 0<δ≤R≤B<∞ on its radial projection. For Aλ(R)=(m+λR)−2 and each integer j≥0, ∂RjAλ(R)=(−1)j(j+1)! λj(m+λR)j+2. The denominator is at least mj+2; for j=0, Aλ→m−2 uniformly on [δ,B], and for j≥1 the displayed derivatives tend uniformly to zero. Thus every radial derivative of R2Aλ converges uniformly to that of R2/m2. The other radial metric coefficient is m2R−2+2mλR−1+λ2, and the angular coefficient is m2+2mλR+λ2R2; all their derivatives converge uniformly on [δ,B]. The electric field coefficient is −qeAλ, and the magnetic term is independent of λ. The fixed smooth sphere tensors have bounded derivatives on compact subsets of each chart in a finite atlas covering the sphere projection of K. Therefore every coordinate derivative of every coefficient of gλ and Fλ converges uniformly on K to the displayed g0 and F0.

4.1givenF2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

If qe=m and qm=0, formulas 1.1–3.1 specialize to M=qe=m>0, x0=T/λ, r=m+λR and Fλ=−m(m+λR)−2dT∧dR. These are exactly the current hypotheses and field pullback in [F2]; the same metric formula and local all-derivative convergence agree with that supplier. No statement about unprovided charge sectors is inferred from [F2].

Remarks

The two-form is pulled back along the same coordinate map as the metric. The limiting field is not set to a constant by analogy: its electric coefficient is −qe/m2 and its magnetic component remains qmωS2. The uniformity statement is local in the scaled coordinate R and deliberately excludes the boundary R=0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources