Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Extremal RN to Bertotti-Robinson in C-infinity local scaling

RN extremality convention

For this Reissner–Nordström parameterization with M>0, “extremal” means M2=qe2+qm2. In the purely electric case qm=0, this is ∣qe∣=M.

Convergence convention

Cloc∞ convergence on RT×(0,∞)R×S2 means uniform convergence of every coordinate derivative on each compact subset in a finite smooth atlas.

Statement

Fix L>0 and take the extremal RN datum with M=qe=L, qm=0, on r>L in Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains. For each dimensionless λ>0, define

Φλ(T,R,ω)=(x0=T/λ, r=L+λR, ω),(T,R,ω)∈R×(0,∞)×S2.

Writing gλ=Φλ∗g and Fλ=Φλ∗F, one has

gλ=−R2(L+λR)2 dT2+(L+λR)2R2 dR2+(L+λR)2γS2,Fλ=−L(L+λR)2 dT∧dR.

As λ↓0, these tensors converge in Cloc∞ on RT×(0,∞)R×S2 to

g0=−R2L2dT2+L2R2dR2+L2γS2,F0=−1L dT∧dR.

Under T=Lτ, R=Lz, the limiting datum is exactly the f(z)=z2, z>0 product in Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data, and it is a geometric electrovac datum by Product electrovacuum equations from full factor Ricci. Here Cloc∞ means uniform convergence of every coordinate derivative on every compact subset in a finite smooth atlas. The convergence is only on R>0; no extension or convergence across R=0 is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The RN and Bertotti-Robinson definitions, the extremal parameters M=qe=L>0, and λ>0.

[F1]

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains gives f(r)=1−2M/r+(qe2+qm2)/r2 and F=−qer−2dx0∧dr when qm=0.

[F2]

Full dyonic Reissner-Nordström electrovac verification proves the dyonic RN datum is source-free electrovac on every open domain with r>0 and f≠0. Only its geometric clause is used.

[F3]

Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data defines gL,z2 and FL on z>0.

[F4]

Product electrovacuum equations from full factor Ricci proves this limiting product is electrovac.

[F5]

Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization defines the geometric equations satisfied by both source and limiting data.

[A1]

L>0, λ>0, and R>0, so r=L+λR>L and every denominator displayed in the Statement is nonzero.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2algebraconstruct

The map Φλ is a diffeomorphism from RT×(0,∞)R×S2 onto the RN exterior r>L, since x0=T/λ and r=L+λR have smooth inverses. Its pullback satisfies dx0=dT/λ and dr=λdR, while f(r)=(1−L/r)2=λ2R2/(L+λR)2. Substitution into the RN metric in [F1] gives the displayed gλ. The starting RN datum is a geometric electrovac by the first clause of [F2]; the claim here is the exact coordinate pullback and its limit.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

The RN two-form in [F1] pulls back to −L(L+λR)2dTλ∧(λdR)=−L(L+λR)2dT∧dR, which is the displayed Fλ.

3.1givenA1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

At λ=0 the coefficient formulas in the Statement are smooth for R>0. Fix any compact subset K of RT×(0,∞)R×S2 and choose a finite smooth atlas on its sphere projection. In each chart, R is bounded below by a positive number and L+λR≥L for 0≤λ≤1. Every coordinate derivative of every displayed coefficient is therefore a continuous function of (λ,T,R,θ,ϕ) on a compact set containing {0}×K; uniform continuity implies that each such derivative converges uniformly on K to its value at λ=0. Since this holds for every derivative order and the atlas is finite, the convergence is Cloc∞.

4.1givenF3F4F5step 3.1algebra∎

Substituting T=Lτ and R=Lz into g0,F0 gives L2(−z2dτ2+z−2dz2+γS2) and −L dτ∧dz, exactly [F3] with f=z2. By [F4] this limiting product satisfies the equations defined in [F5]. This identification is on z>0 only and does not add a horizon chart.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources