Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Charged photon trapping and extremal scaling

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

RN circular null radius and exterior instability

Statement

Let m>0 and qe,qm∈R be length parameters, put Q2=qe2+qm2, and assume 0≤Q2<m2. Use the asymptotically flat dyonic Reissner–Nordström metric with M=m and f(r)=1−2m/r+Q2/r2 on the exterior r>r+:=m+m2−Q2. Here r− denotes the other algebraic horizon root m−m2−Q2; when Q2>0, r± are the local null Killing horizons of the selected RN model, and when Q2=0, r+=2m is the larger root. An equatorial circular null geodesic means a smooth nonconstant affinely parametrized geodesic γ(s)=(x0(s),rc,π/2,ϕ(s)) with g(γ˙,γ˙)=0 and nonzero angular momentum ℓ=rc2ϕ˙. Its effective radial function is h(r)=f(r)/r2. The outer circular null radius is

rph+=3m+9m2−8Q22.

It lies strictly above r+ and is a strict local maximum of h. Along an equatorial geodesic, define the conserved quantities E:=f(r)x˙0 and ℓ:=r2ϕ˙. At fixed E,ℓ, the null radial geodesic equation is r¨=−12ℓ2h′(r). Its radial linearization at r=rph+, defined by writing r=rph++ϵρ(s) and retaining the terms of first order in ϵ, is ρ¨−ν2ρ=0, where ν2:=−12ℓ2h′′(rph+)>0; it has the growing mode ρ(s)=eνs. The other algebraic stationary radius is rph−=(3m−9m2−8Q2)/2; this proposition assigns it no exterior-orbit interpretation. Coordinates x0,r,m,qe,qm have length units, angular coordinates are dimensionless, and the affine parameter has arbitrary normalization. This is a null-ray calculation for the exact RN metric; it proves no wave-decay or Morawetz estimate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The dyonic RN metric with m>0, 0≤Q2<m2, and a smooth equatorial affinely parametrized null geodesic in the static exterior with nonzero angular momentum.

[F1]

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains: for Q2=qe2+qm2 and f(r)=1−2m/r+Q2/r2, the static metric is g=−f(dx0)2+f−1dr2+r2γS2 on each open set where f≠0.

[F2]

The round metric on the sphere as an induced metric: in spherical coordinates the unit round metric is γS2=dθ2+sin⁡2θ dϕ2.

[F3]

RN roots, Killing horizons and surface gravity: when Q2>0 and m2≥Q2, the positive roots are r±=m±m2−Q2 and are local null constant-radius Killing horizons. Its theorem's Q2>0 hypothesis is used only for this horizon interpretation; the Q2=0 root is handled directly below.

[F4]

Geodesic of an affine connection: an affinely parametrized geodesic satisfies Dsγ˙=0 on its interval.

[F5]

Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields: assuming ACω, the metric-selected connection of a smooth nondegenerate metric has coordinate coefficients Γabc=12gad(∂bgdc+∂cgbd−∂dgbc).

[F6]

Explicit rational and real power regimes: for a>0, a is the unique positive real s with s2=a.

[F7]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): ACω asserts that every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. This is the assumption explicitly used by [F5].

[A1]

m>0, qe,qm∈R, and 0≤Q2=qe2+qm2<m2.

[A2]

Adopt ACω as required by [F5]. No further choice principle is used.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4F5F6F7A1A2algebra

Let x=m2−Q2. By [F6] and [A1], 0<x≤m, so r−=m−x≥0 and r+=m+x>0. Factoring gives f(r)=(r−r+)(r−r−)/r2>0 on r>r+. From [F1]–[F2] the equatorial metric components are g00=−f, grr=f−1, gθθ=r2, and gϕϕ=r2sin⁡2θ. Substitution in [F5] gives Γ00r=f′/(2f), Γϕrϕ=1/r, Γr00=ff′/2, Γrrr=−f′/(2f), Γrϕϕ=−frsin⁡2θ, Γrθθ=−fr, Γθrθ=1/r, and Γθϕϕ=−sin⁡θcos⁡θ. The x0 and ϕ geodesic equations of [F4] are therefore x¨0+(f′/f)r˙x˙0=0 and ϕ¨+2(r˙/r)ϕ˙=0. At θ=π/2, θ˙=0, the r equation is r¨+12ff′(x˙0)2−f′2fr˙2−frϕ˙2=0. The θ equation is θ¨+2(r˙/r)θ˙−sin⁡θcos⁡θϕ˙2=0, so θ=π/2, θ˙=0 is invariant. Differentiating the x0 and ϕ equations shows that E:=fx˙0 and ℓ:=r2ϕ˙ are constant along the geodesic.

2.1givenF1A1step 1.1algebra

The null condition is −f(x˙0)2+f−1r˙2+r2ϕ˙2=0. Multiplying by f>0 and using the constants from 1.1 gives r˙2+ℓ2h(r)=E2, where h=f/r2.

2.2givenF1F4F5A1step 1.1algebra

For a circular orbit r=rc, the radial geodesic equation from 1.1 has r˙=r¨=0 and reads 12ff′(x˙0)2−frc(ϕ˙)2=0. The null equation and ℓ≠0 imply rcf′(rc)−2f(rc)=0, equivalently h′(rc)=0. Direct differentiation gives h′(r)=−2(r2−3mr+2Q2)/r5, so its algebraic roots are rph±=(3m±9m2−8Q2)/2. They are real because 9m2−8Q2=m2+8(m2−Q2)>0.

3.1givenF1F3F6A1step 2.2algebra

Put x=m2−Q2, so 0<x≤m. Then 9m2−8Q2=m2+8x2>x, and rph+−r+=m+m2+8x2−2x2=(m−x)+(m2+8x2−x)2>0. For Q2>0, [F3] identifies r+ as the outer local horizon. For Q2=0, [F1] gives f=1−2m/r, whose larger root is r+=2m; the same inequality applies. Thus f(rph+)>0 and the outer root lies in the static exterior.

3.2givenA1step 2.2algebra

At the outer root, r2−3mr+2Q2=0 and 2rph+−3m=9m2−8Q2, so h′′(rph+)=−29m2−8Q2/rph+5<0. Hence h has a strict local maximum there.

4.1givenF1F4F5F6A1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2algebraconstruct∎

Since f(rph+)>0, [F6] defines h(rph+). Choose ℓ>0 and E=ℓh(rph+). The explicit curve x0(s)=Es/f(rph+), r(s)=rph+, θ(s)=π/2, and ϕ(s)=ℓs/rph+2 is null and satisfies the x0,ϕ,θ geodesic equations from 1.1. Its radial geodesic equation is exactly the circular condition in 2.2, so it is an affinely parametrized circular null geodesic. For a general equatorial null geodesic, the radial geodesic equation from 1.1 and the constants in 1.1 give r¨=−E2f′(r)2f(r)+f′(r)2f(r)r˙2+f(r)ℓ2r3. Using the null first integral 2.1, E2=r˙2+ℓ2f(r)/r2, cancels the two r˙2 terms and yields r¨=−ℓ22h′(r). Thus the first radial variation ρ at the outer circular orbit, with E,ℓ fixed, satisfies ρ¨+12ℓ2h′′(rph+)ρ=0, equivalently ρ¨−ν2ρ=0, where ν2=−12ℓ2h′′(rph+)>0 by 3.2. This equation has the growing solution ρ(s)=eνs, as asserted.

Remarks

The smaller algebraic stationary radius is not used to infer an additional exterior trapping orbit. Radial null geodesics have ℓ=0 and are a separate class. The argument establishes only the exact metric's circular-ray trapping and instability; no wave estimate follows from it.

The diagram is a schematic ordering of areal radii, not a distance scale. Panel (a) depicts 0<Q2<m2; the proven exterior is r>r+, and the proof above—not the drawing—establishes rph+>r+. Panel (b) is the excluded extremal endpoint: the algebraic horizon roots coalesce at m, while the continuous limit of the outer stationary-radius formula is 2m.

\begin{tikzpicture}[x=1cm,y=1cm]
  \draw[->] (0,0) -- (8,0) node[right] {$r$};
  \draw[densely dashed] (1.35,-0.18) -- (1.35,0.18);
  \draw[densely dashed] (3.15,-0.18) -- (3.15,0.18);
  \draw[very thick] (3.15,0) -- (8,0);
  \draw[fill=black] (5.55,0) circle (1.6pt);
  \node[below] at (1.35,-0.2) {$r_-$};
  \node[below] at (3.15,-0.2) {$r_+$};
  \node[above] at (5.55,0.12) {$r_{\mathrm{ph}+}$};
  \node[above] at (5.3,0.65) {subextremal exterior};
  \node[below] at (0,-0.48) {0};
  \node[below] at (3.15,-0.72) {$r>r_+$};
  \draw[->] (0,-1.55) -- (8,-1.55) node[right] {$r$};
  \draw[densely dashed] (3.15,-1.73) -- (3.15,-1.37);
  \draw[fill=black] (5.55,-1.55) circle (1.6pt);
  \node[below] at (3.15,-1.77) {$r_-=r_+=m$};
  \node[above] at (5.55,-1.42) {$r_{\mathrm{ph}+}=2m$};
  \node[above] at (5.2,-0.95) {extremal endpoint};
\end{tikzpicture}
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Extremal dyonic RN throat as a local scaled limit

Statement

Let m>0 and qe,qm∈R be length parameters with qe2+qm2=m2, set the RN mass parameter M=m, and use the exact dyonic RN metric and two-form on r>m. For each dimensionless λ>0, define Φλ(T,R,ω)=(x0=T/λ, r=m+λR, ω) on D=RT×(0,∞)R×S2. Then

gλ:=Φλ∗g=−R2(m+λR)2 dT2+(m+λR)2R2 dR2+(m+λR)2γS2,Fλ:=Φλ∗F=−qe(m+λR)2 dT∧dR+qmωS2.

As λ↓0, the pair converges with every coordinate derivative uniformly on each compact subset of D to

g0=−R2m2 dT2+m2R2 dR2+m2γS2,F0=−qem2 dT∧dR+qmωS2.

Here x0,r,T,R,m,qe,qm have length units, λ is dimensionless, and γS2,ωS2 are the unit round metric and outward area form. “Convergence with every coordinate derivative uniformly on compact subsets” means that, in a finite smooth atlas, every coordinate derivative of each tensor coefficient converges uniformly on each compact subset. The convergence is only on R>0: it asserts neither extension through R=0, uniform control over the whole original exterior, nor a decoupled theory. In the positive-electric subcase qe=m, qm=0, the displayed pullbacks agree exactly with the inherited near-horizon theorem's field and metric formulas.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact dyonic RN datum with M=m>0, qe2+qm2=m2, a dimensionless λ>0, and R>0.

[F1]

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains: on f≠0, g=−f(dx0)2+f−1dr2+r2γS2 and F=−qer−2dx0∧dr+qmωS2, where f=1−2M/r+(qe2+qm2)/r2.

[F2]

Extremal RN to Bertotti-Robinson in C-infinity local scaling: only for M=qe=L>0, qm=0, the map Φλ(T,R,ω)=(x0=T/λ,r=L+λR,ω) has the stated exact pullbacks and Cloc∞ limit on R>0. The local argument below extends the explicit coordinate calculation to the dyonic charge pair; [F2] is used only in its exact positive-electric case.

[A1]

m>0, λ>0, and R>0, so r=m+λR>m and m+λR≥m>0. The extremality identity is qe2+qm2=m2.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1algebraconstruct

The extremality identity gives f(r)=(1−m/r)2=λ2R2/(m+λR)2. The map Φλ is a diffeomorphism from D onto Rx0×(m,∞)r×S2, with inverse T=λx0, R=(r−m)/λ. Its differentials satisfy dx0=dT/λ and dr=λdR. Substitution in [F1] gives the displayed gλ.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

The same pullback differentials give dx0∧dr=(dT/λ)∧(λdR)=dT∧dR; substituting r=m+λR in the two-form of [F1] gives the displayed Fλ.

3.1givenA1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Fix a compact K⊂D and choose 0<δ≤R≤B<∞ on its radial projection. For Aλ(R)=(m+λR)−2 and each integer j≥0, ∂RjAλ(R)=(−1)j(j+1)! λj(m+λR)j+2. The denominator is at least mj+2; for j=0, Aλ→m−2 uniformly on [δ,B], and for j≥1 the displayed derivatives tend uniformly to zero. Thus every radial derivative of R2Aλ converges uniformly to that of R2/m2. The other radial metric coefficient is m2R−2+2mλR−1+λ2, and the angular coefficient is m2+2mλR+λ2R2; all their derivatives converge uniformly on [δ,B]. The electric field coefficient is −qeAλ, and the magnetic term is independent of λ. The fixed smooth sphere tensors have bounded derivatives on compact subsets of each chart in a finite atlas covering the sphere projection of K. Therefore every coordinate derivative of every coefficient of gλ and Fλ converges uniformly on K to the displayed g0 and F0.

4.1givenF2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

If qe=m and qm=0, formulas 1.1–3.1 specialize to M=qe=m>0, x0=T/λ, r=m+λR and Fλ=−m(m+λR)−2dT∧dR. These are exactly the current hypotheses and field pullback in [F2]; the same metric formula and local all-derivative convergence agree with that supplier. No statement about unprovided charge sectors is inferred from [F2].

Remarks

The two-form is pulled back along the same coordinate map as the metric. The limiting field is not set to a constant by analogy: its electric coefficient is −qe/m2 and its magnetic component remains qmωS2. The uniformity statement is local in the scaled coordinate R and deliberately excludes the boundary R=0.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources