Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact small-field coupled residual order

Statement

Let U be a smooth Lorentzian four-dimensional chart domain with metric g as in Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions, and let Λ∈R be constant. Write Ωk(U) for the smooth real k-forms on U. Here d:Ωk(U)→Ωk+1(U), 0≤k≤3, is the exterior derivative with coordinate formula (dβ)a0…ak=(k+1)∂[a0βa1…ak], and ⋆g:Ω2(U)→Ω2(U) is the Lorentzian Hodge map characterized by α∧⋆gβ=12αabβab vol⁡g for α,β∈Ω2(U), as in Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star. Both operators are real-linear. Suppose Gab(g)+Λgab=0. Let F1∈Ω2(U) satisfy dF1=0 and d(⋆gF1)=0. For any real dimensionless ε, put Fε:=εF1 and define

Tab(1):=μ0−1Qab(g,F1),Rab(g,F;Λ):=Gab(g)+Λgab−κμ0Qab(g,F),

using κ,μ0,Q of SI and geometrized Einstein–Maxwell parameters and Exact geometric electrovac normalization. Then Fε remains an exact source-free Maxwell field on the fixed metric and

Rab(g,Fε;Λ)=−κε2Tab(1).

For a smooth covariant two-tensor S and compact K⊂U, define the chart component norm of its restriction by ∥S∥K:=max⁡0≤a,b≤3sup⁡p∈K∣Sab(p)∣ when K≠∅. In this estimate and its applications, use sup⁡p∈∅f(p):=0 for nonnegative component functions f; equivalently, the empty restriction has ∥S∥∅:=0. It is finite for smooth S and satisfies

∥R(g,Fε;Λ)∥K=κε2∥T(1)∥K.

If ε≠0 and T(1) is not identically zero on K, the fixed pair (g,Fε) is not an exact coupled Einstein–Maxwell solution on K. This is a residual estimate only; it gives no nearby metric, solution-distance bound, point-source solution or backreaction limit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth Lorentzian geometry of Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions, positive constants and quadratic tensor of SI and geometrized Einstein–Maxwell parameters, a compact chart subset K, and the stated vacuum and source-free equations. The inherited geometric setup carries ACω as in [A1].

[F1]

The tensor Qab(g,F) is quadratic in the two-form and the Einstein normalization uses the coefficient κ/μ0. (Exact geometric electrovac normalization)

[F2]

The geometric setup admits smooth two-forms; the specified F1 is smooth on U. (Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions)

[F3]

The exterior derivative on smooth forms is real-linear, and the Lorentzian Hodge map is a real-linear bundle map characterized by α∧⋆gβ=⟨α,β⟩gvol⁡g, with ⟨α,β⟩g=12αabβab on two-forms. (Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star)

[A1]

The inherited choice assumption is Countable Choice ACω, not full Choice. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

1.1givenF2F3A1algebra

Exterior differentiation and the Hodge map are real-linear by [F3], so dFε=εdF1=0 and d(⋆gFε)=εd(⋆gF1)=0. Thus the source-free Maxwell equations remain exactly satisfied on the unchanged g.

1.2givenF1algebra

Each term of Q is quadratic in F, so Q(g,Fε)=ε2Q(g,F1) and the associated lower tensor is ε2T(1) by the definition in the Statement.

2.1givenF1step 1.2algebra

Substituting the assumed vacuum equation G(g)+Λg=0 and step 1.2 into the residual definition gives R(g,Fε;Λ)=−κε2T(1) exactly.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra∎

If K=∅, the stated convention makes both norms in the claimed equality zero. Suppose K≠∅. Each component f=Sab∣K is continuous; the relative open sets f−1((−n,n)), for positive integers n, cover K. Compactness gives a finite subcover, and the largest of its indices bounds ∣f∣ on K. Thus every component supremum, and hence their finite maximum, is finite. The norm is homogeneous, so step 2.1 and κε2≥0 give ∥R∥K=κε2∥T(1)∥K. If ε≠0 and T(1) is not identically zero on K, then K is nonempty and some component of T(1) is nonzero at a point of K; step 2.1 makes the residual nonzero there, so the fixed pair fails the coupled equation on K. No estimate comparing it with a different metric follows from this identity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources