Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact unclosed kinetic conservation laws

Statement

Let I and the periodic cell Ω be as in the kinetic-density definition, and let f:I×Ω×R3→(0,∞) be continuously differentiable in (t,x) and measurable in v. For each compact I0⊂I and each ψ∈{m,mv1,mv2,mv3,m∣v∣2/2}, assume there are nonnegative functions Gψ,0,I0,Gψ,j,I0∈L1(R3,dv) for j=1,2,3, independent of (t,x)∈I0×Ω, such that for almost every v and every (t,x)∈I0×Ω, ∣ψ(v)∂tf(t,x,v)∣≤Gψ,0,I0(v),∣ψ(v)vj∂xjf(t,x,v)∣≤Gψ,j,I0(v)(j=1,2,3). At every (t,x) assume ∫ω3(v)f(t,x,v) dv<∞, so the moments through absolute order three are finite. In addition, assume ∫I0∫Ω∫R3ω3(v)f(t,x,v) dv dx dt<∞ for every compact time interval I0⊂I; this makes the moment densities and fluxes locally integrable in space-time. The velocity integral here is over all of R3, without a velocity cutoff. Use the collision set Qel={(v,w,v′,w′)∈R12:v+w=v′+w′, ∣v∣2+∣w∣2=∣v′∣2+∣w′∣2} with its relative Borel sigma-algebra, and the nonnegative countably additive measure ν invariant under particle exchange in either pair and incoming/outgoing interchange, together with the operator Qν from the elastic-collision definition. At each (t,x) assume f(t,x,⋅)∈Dν and 1,v1,v2,v3,∣v∣2∈Sf(t,x,⋅), with the measurability and absolute-convergence conditions of that definition. With A=f(v)f(w), B=f(v′)f(w′), and δφ=φ(v)+φ(w)−φ(v′)−φ(w′), assume for each such test that ∫R3φ(v)Qν(f)(v) dv=14∫Qel(B−A)δφ dν. Suppose pointwise that ∂tf+v⋅∇xf=Qν(f). Set n:=∫f dv, ρ:=mn, u:=n−1∫vf dv, c:=v−u, T:=m(3kBn)−1∫∣c∣2f dv, P:=m∫c⊗cf dv, q:=(m/2)∫∣c∣2cf dv, and E:=(m/2)∫∣v∣2f dv, using the positive constants m,kB and Lebesgue measure from the kinetic-density definition. Define (Pu)i:=∑jPijuj and ∇x⋅A rowwise for a matrix field A. Then on I×Ω, ∂tρ+∇x⋅(ρu)=0, ∂t(ρu)+∇x⋅(ρu⊗u+P)=0, ∂tE+∇x⋅(Eu+Pu+q)=0. These are exact unclosed moment identities conditional on the displayed equation and integrability assumptions. They do not determine P or q from ρ,u,T and do not assert existence of a solution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The regular positive solution of the displayed kinetic equation, the finite absolute third moment, the derivative envelopes, and the admissibility of the collision-invariant tests.

[F1]

Nonnegative kinetic density and moment domain: ρ=mn, ρu=m∫vf dv, P=m∫(v−u)⊗(v−u)f dv, q=(m/2)∫∣v−u∣2(v−u)f dv, and E=(m/2)∫∣v∣2f dv.

[F2]

Elastic collision measure and weak collision operator: For every admissible test φ, ∫φQν(f) dv=(1/4)∫(B−A)δφ dν; elastic collisions conserve pair momentum and squared speed.

[F3]

Differentiation under the integral sign: An integrable common envelope for the parameter derivative permits differentiation under the velocity integral.

[F4]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: Absolutely integrable functions on the product of the periodic spatial and velocity measure spaces may be integrated in either order.

[A1]

The function f and its derivatives satisfy all regularity, envelope, collision-test, and local weighted L1 assumptions in the Statement.

Proof

1.1givenF2A1algebra

On every elastic quadruple, δ1=0, δvi=vi+wi−vi′−wi′=0, and δ(∣v∣2)=∣v∣2+∣w∣2−∣v′∣2−∣w′∣2=0. Multiplication by the constants m and m/2 preserves these zero brackets. The weak identity [F2] therefore gives ∫mQν(f) dv=0, ∫mviQν(f) dv=0, and ∫(m/2)∣v∣2Qν(f) dv=0 at each (t,x).

2.1givenA1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Multiply the kinetic equation in [A1] successively by m, mvi, and m∣v∣2/2, and integrate over velocity. For each multiplier ψ, [F3] passes the time derivative of ∫ψf dv through the velocity integral; for each spatial coordinate xj, it passes the derivative of the corresponding flux component ∫ψvjf dv through that integral using the stated Gψ,j,I0 envelope. Step 1.1 removes the collision terms, so the density, momentum, and energy equations have fluxes m∫vf dv, m∫v⊗vf dv, and (m/2)∫∣v∣2vf dv, respectively. The added weighted Lloc1 hypothesis makes these moment densities and fluxes locally integrable; the derivative envelopes make the differentiated integrands locally integrable, so product Fubini [F4] justifies the distributional balances.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

Since ∫cf dv=0 by the definition of u, expanding v=u+c gives m∫vf dv=ρu and m∫v⊗vf dv=ρu⊗u+P. Expanding ∣u+c∣2(u+c), the terms linear in c integrate to zero, the 2(u⋅c)c term contributes Pu, the ∣c∣2u term contributes (tr⁡P)u/2, and the ∣c∣2c term contributes q. Since E=ρ∣u∣2/2+tr⁡P/2, the energy flux is Eu+Pu+q. Substitution into step 2.1 gives all three asserted balances.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources