Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Summing unresolved coherent emissions removes the lower cutoff

Statement

In the defined finite-cutoff coherent model, let 0<ε<Δ<Λ and C≥0. Let Nu and Nr be the counts in the unresolved band (ε,Δ) and resolved band [Δ,Λ), respectively. The exclusive no-emission probability is P(Nu=0,Nr=0)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡Λε). For every n∈N0, P(Nu=n,Nr=0)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡Λε)(Clog⁡Δε)nn!. Summing over all unresolved counts gives the finite-resolution inclusive probability P(Nr=0)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡ΛΔ), which is independent of the lower cutoff ε. This is an exact identity in the defined free coherent model; it does not assert real–virtual cancellation in interacting QED or a detector's empirical response.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model's finite cutoffs 0<ε<Δ<Λ and coefficient C≥0.

[A1]

Independent soft-radiation resolution model: Δ defines unresolved frequencies (ε,Δ) and resolved frequencies [Δ,Λ); all cutoff values are angular frequencies in s−1.

[F1]

Orthogonal frequency bands in the coherent soft model have independent Poisson counts: counts in disjoint frequency bands are independent Poisson variables, with mean C∫Bdν/ν on a band B.

[F2]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: for 0<a<b, log⁡(b/a)=∫abdν/ν; splitting this integral at Δ gives log⁡(Λ/ε)=log⁡(Δ/ε)+log⁡(Λ/Δ).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2algebra

Define λu=C∫εΔdν/ν and λr=C∫ΔΛdν/ν. By [F2], λu=Clog⁡(Δ/ε), λr=Clog⁡(Λ/Δ), and λu+λr=Clog⁡(Λ/ε). The endpoint ν=Δ has zero one-particle measure, so assigning it to the resolved interval does not change either mean.

1.2F1F4givenalgebra

Independence in [F1] gives P(Nu=n,Nr=0)=exp⁡(−λu)λun/n! exp⁡(−λr) for every n∈N0. This also covers C=0: at n=0, the convention 00=1 gives probability one, and at positive n the probability is zero. In particular the case n=0 is the exclusive no-emission probability.

2.1F3step 1.2algebra

Summing the joint probabilities over n and using the everywhere convergent exponential series [F3] gives ∑n=0∞P(Nu=n,Nr=0)=exp⁡(−λu−λr)∑n=0∞λunn!=exp⁡(−λr). The terms are nonnegative and the series is absolutely convergent, so this sum is the probability of the disjoint union of the events {Nu=n,Nr=0}.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substituting λr=Clog⁡(Λ/Δ) from step 1.1 yields P(Nr=0)=exp⁡(−Clog⁡(Λ/Δ)), with no remaining ε. The conclusion is a model deduction from the finite-band Poisson law, not a statement about virtual amplitudes in QED.

Remarks

The sketch records only the interval partition used above; the proof does not rely on the diagram. The boundary frequency Δ is assigned to the resolved interval, and its zero measure is why this convention does not change the calculation.

º"¢¤unresolvedresolved

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources