Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Soft coherent radiation, resolution and inclusive cancellation

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Independent soft-radiation resolution model

Definition

Assume ACω: every sequence (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets admits a function s with s(n)∈Xn for every n. Use the following SI constants and meanings: c>0 is the speed of light in vacuum, in m s−1; ℏ>0 is the reduced Planck constant, in J s; e>0 is the magnitude of the elementary charge, in C; and μ0>0 is the vacuum permeability, in H m−1, used here as a positive parameter without assigning it a numerical value. Set g=eμ0cℏ>0, which is dimensionless. These are the adopted QFT SI conventions.

Let I be a finite, possibly empty, set of leg labels. For each i∈I, choose an energy Ei>0 in J and a physical velocity vi,phys∈R3 in m s−1 with ∣vi,phys∣<c. Write vi=vi,phys/c∈R3, so vi is dimensionless and ∣vi∣<1. Also choose a dimensionless charge number Qi∈R (the assigned physical charge is eQi in C) and an orientation ηi∈{−1,1}, where −1 denotes an incoming leg and +1 an outgoing leg. Assume charge balance ∑i∈IηiQi=0. For four-vectors a=(a0,a),b=(b0,b)∈R4, write h=diag⁡(1,−1,−1,−1) and h(a,b)=a0b0−a⋅b for the algebraic contraction with signature (+,−,−,−) used in this model.

For n∈S2={x∈R3:∣x∣=1} and angular frequency ν>0 in s−1, with associated model photon energy ℏν in J, put pi=Ei(1,vi) and q=ℏν(1,n) in R4. On Q={ℏν(1,n):ν>0, n∈S2}⊂R4, define the prescribed current J:Q→R4 and angular coefficient K:S2→R4 by J(q)=∑i∈IηiQipih(pi,q),K(n)=∑i∈IηiQi(1,vi)1−vi⋅n. Because ∣vi⋅n∣≤∣vi∣<1, every denominator 1−vi⋅n is strictly positive. The data make h(pi,q)=Eiℏν(1−vi⋅n)>0 and J(q)=K(n)/(ℏν). The balance condition gives h(J(q),q)=0; this is the conservation convention for this prescribed eikonal current in the model. Here “prescribed eikonal current” means exactly the displayed rational map J on these model photon energy four-vectors; no scattering-amplitude factorization or approximation is asserted.

Let A⊆S2 be a Borel angular acceptance region. The sphere S2⊂R3 is a compact embedded smooth hypersurface, and dΩ denotes its Euclidean chart surface measure: for a finite regular injective C1 chart cover Xj:Vj→S2, where each Vj is open in R2, with C1 coordinate transitions and a subordinate ambient partition of unity χj whose supports are compactly contained in the chart neighborhoods, its integral on a nonnegative Borel function F is ∫S2F dΩ=∑j∫Vj(χjF)(Xj(y))det⁡(DXj(y)TDXj(y)) dy. This is the chart-independent induced surface integral. Write K(n)=(K0(n),K(n)) and define K⊥(n)=(I3−nnT)K(n), where I3 is the 3×3 identity matrix. Put b0(n)=gK⊥(n)2(2π)3,b(n)=1A(n)b0(n),C=∫S2∣b(n)∣2 dΩ(n). The earlier current theorem proves b0∈L2(S2,dΩ;R3) for these finite balanced subluminal legs; since A is Borel, b∈L2 and 0≤C≤∫S2∣b0∣2dΩ<∞. Thus b and C are dimensionless.

For the one-particle space, write x⋅y=∑j=13xjyj(x,y∈R3),a⋅b=∑j=13ajbj(a,b∈C3), where the second dot product is the complex-bilinear extension. The fiber Hermitian pairing is a‾⋅b=∑jaj‾bj, with norm ∣a∣2=∑j∣aj∣2. Set H=L2(R3,d3k;C3),⟨u,v⟩2=∫R3u(k)‾⋅v(k) d3k, Here d3k is Lebesgue measure, and this pairing is second-variable-linear. For k≠0, put k^=k/∣k∣ and PT(k)=I3−k^k^T, the Euclidean orthogonal projection onto the fiber plane perpendicular to k; assign any value at k=0. Its multiplier is an orthogonal projection on H, so its range is closed. The transverse one-particle Hilbert space is HT=Ran⁡MPT={u∈H:k⋅u(k)=0 for a.e. k≠0}, where MPT is multiplication by PT, and the real Euclidean dot product is extended complex-bilinearly in the transverse condition. This is the transverse one-particle space used in this model.

For m≥1, use the iterated Hilbert tensor completion HT⊗^m, with product pairing on elementary tensors. Here Sm is the permutation group and Uπ(u1⊗⋯⊗um)=uπ−1(1)⊗⋯⊗uπ−1(m). Set Ps,m=1m!∑π∈SmUπ,Hs(m)=Ran⁡Ps,m; put Ps,0=IC and Hs(0)=C. The symmetric bosonic Fock space is Fs(HT)={(Ψm)m≥0:Ψm∈Hs(m), ∑m≥0∥Ψm∥2<∞}, with componentwise pairing and vacuum 1∈C in sector zero. For f∈HT, define the exponential-vector map ϵ:HT→Fs(HT) by ϵ(f)=⨁m=0∞Ps,m(f⊗m)m!. Here f⊗0=1 in the vacuum sector. Since f⊗m is already symmetric, Ps,m(f⊗m)=f⊗m for m≥1; write this tensor as f⊗sm.

For fixed angular-frequency cutoffs 0<ε<Δ<Λ, let ν(k)=c∣k∣ in s−1, with k in m−1. The one-particle coherent displacement is the transverse mode function fε,Λ(k)=1{ε<ν(k)<Λ}∣k∣−3/2×b ⁣(k∣k∣)(k≠0),fε,Λ(0)=0. The function fε,Λ has units m3/2 in HT; the associated free one-photon energy is ℏν(k)=ℏc∣k∣ in J. Define its normalized coherent vector by Ψε,Λ=exp⁡ ⁣(−∥fε,Λ∥22)ϵ(fε,Λ). For a finite partition B1,…,Br of (ε,Λ) into disjoint Borel intervals, let Hj={u∈HT:u(k)=0 a.e. unless ν(k)∈Bj}. Let Pj be multiplication on HT by 1{ν(k)∈Bj}. This bounded self-adjoint idempotent preserves transversality because it is scalar-valued, so it is an orthogonal projection. Its range is exactly Hj, making Hj closed. For j≠k, disjointness gives PjPk=0, hence the ranges are orthogonal. For a tuple (m1,…,mr)∈N0r, put M=∑jmj. Its occupation subspace is the closed span in sector Hs(M) of the vectors Ps,M(⨂j=1r⨂ℓ=1mjuj,ℓ),uj,ℓ∈Hj, where the empty tensor for M=0 is the vacuum 1∈C. It has exactly mj factors in Hj and no factor outside ⨁jHj. Define N(Bj) to have value mj on this subspace. The model assigns the tuple probability equal to the squared norm of the projection of Ψε,Λ onto it. Its resolution parameter Δ divides (ε,Λ) into the unresolved band (ε,Δ) and the resolved band [Δ,Λ). The threshold frequency is assigned to the resolved band; its exact assignment does not change any L2 vector or probability because a single frequency has zero one-particle measure. This is a finite-cutoff free coherent-state model; it does not posit a detector response or an interacting QED scattering law.

Remarks

The well-definedness of C, the transverse L2 vector fε,Λ, the normalized exponential vector, and the band counting probabilities is established in Orthogonal frequency bands in the coherent soft model have independent Poisson counts ↗. The exact formulas are conditional on the stated finite leg data and cutoffs. They introduce no empirical photon counts, no virtual corrections, and no claim of full Bloch–Nordsieck or KLN cancellation.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Orthogonal frequency bands in the coherent soft model have independent Poisson counts

Statement

Fix the finite-leg current data and cutoffs of the resolved-soft model. For every finite partition B1,…,Br of (ε,Λ) into disjoint Borel frequency intervals, the coherent state Ψε,Λ has independent band counts. For each j, N(Bj) has Poisson distribution with mean λj=C∫Bjdνν, where ν is angular frequency in s−1. Thus λj=Clog⁡(bj/aj) for an interval with endpoints 0<aj<bj; endpoint conventions do not matter because dν/ν assigns a singleton zero measure. For C=0 every band count is zero. The model's marked frequency density is the one-particle coherent intensity ∣b(n)∣2 dΩ(n) dν/ν.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω and fix a finite current, a Borel angular region A, and cutoffs 0<ε<Δ<Λ as in the model definition.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω used by the Fock and polar-integration suppliers.

[F1]

Independent soft-radiation resolution model: fε,Λ is the transverse mode function with angular coefficient b(n)=1A(n)gK⊥(n)/2(2π)3; its proposed coherent vector is exp⁡(−∥f∥2/2)ϵ(f), and band counts are the squared norms of the orthogonal occupation-sector projections.

[F2]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions: bosonic Fock space is the square-summable direct sum of symmetric tensor sectors, with vacuum sector C and symmetrizer Ps,N=N!−1∑π∈SNUπ on the N-particle tensor power.

[F3]

Positive transverse photon one-particle space: HT is the closed subspace of L2(R3,d3k;C3) consisting of u with k⋅u(k)=0 a.e.; its projection is PT(k)=I−k^k^ T away from k=0.

[F4]

The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn and Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces: on R3, x⋅y=∑j=13xjyj; dΩ on S2 is the Euclidean chart surface measure.

[F5]

Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure: the chart measure dΩ on S2 equals the finite polar measure dσ.

[F6]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma: for every nonnegative Borel G on R3, ∫G(k)d3k=∫S2∫0∞G(rn)r2 dr dσ(n).

[F7]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: log⁡(b/a)=∫abdν/ν for 0<a<b.

[F8]

The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument, and exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: exp⁡z=∑m≥0zm/m! for every complex z; the series converges absolutely and the complex exponential is multiplicative under addition.

[F9]

The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N and Integer powers am: 0!=1, m!>0, λ0=1, and 0m=0 for positive integer m.

[F10]

Soft-current angular norm and exact cutoff coherent model: for the same finite balanced subluminal legs, the published current theorem uses K⊥ and g to define a full-sphere angular coefficient C0<∞ and a length-coordinate profile ∣k∣−3/2b0(n) with energy cutoffs converted by ω=ℏν. Multiplication by the Borel indicator 1A preserves transversality and has coefficient C=∫A∣b0∣2dΩ≤C0.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F4F5F10algebra

For every leg and every n∈S2, 1−vi⋅n≥1−∣vi∣>0. The finite sum defining K(n) is therefore continuous and bounded on S2. Charge balance gives h(K(n),(1,n))=∑iηiQi=0, so K0(n)=n⋅K(n) and K⊥(n) is the transverse component. The current theorem [F10] uses the same K⊥, g, and dΩ with energy variable ω=ℏν and proves that the full-sphere coefficient C0 is finite. Here b=1Ab0, so C=∫A∣b0∣2dΩ≤C0; the Borel restriction remains transverse. Thus the angular coefficient is square-integrable and C is finite and nonnegative.

2.1F1F3F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

For k=rn≠0, the coefficient b(n) is perpendicular to n, so k⋅fε,Λ(k)=0; hence fε,Λ∈HT once its L2 norm is finite. The Borel cutoff and Borel angular coefficient make the squared norm integrand nonnegative and Borel. Applying [F6] and then ν=cr gives ∥fε,Λ∥2=∫A∣b(n)∣2 dΩ(n)∫ε/cΛ/cdrr=C∫εΛdνν=Clog⁡Λε<∞. For each band define fj(k)=1{ν(k)∈Bj}fε,Λ(k). The same change of variables gives ∥fj∥2=C∫Bjdν/ν=λj. A singleton endpoint has zero one-dimensional Lebesgue measure, since it is covered by intervals of arbitrarily small length; therefore any endpoint convention gives the same integral. Thus the band components belong to pairwise orthogonal closed subspaces of HT, and their squared norms sum to λ=Clog⁡(Λ/ε).

3.1F1F2F8F9step 2.1algebra

In the m-particle sector, ∥f⊗sm/m!∥2=λm/m!. By [F8] and [F9], their sum over m≥0 is exp⁡(λ)<∞. Therefore ϵ(fε,Λ) is a Fock vector of squared norm exp⁡(λ), and the prescribed scalar exp⁡(−λ/2) normalizes Ψε,Λ to norm one.

3.2F2step 2.1constructalgebra

Put M=∑jmj. The symmetrized tensors with different band occupancy tuples are orthogonal because some tensor factor then lies in orthogonal frequency subspaces. For x=f1⊗m1⊗⋯⊗fr⊗mr, the projection formula [F2] gives ∥Ps,Mx∥2=⟨x,Ps,Mx⟩=∏jmj!M!∏j∥fj∥2mj. Indeed, in the permutation sum only permutations within each band block have nonzero inner product with x; there are ∏jmj! such permutations, each contributing ∏j∥fj∥2mj. Expanding f⊗M=(∑jfj)⊗M, the component with occupancy (m1,…,mr) is M!∏jmj!Ps,Mx.

4.1F1F2F8F9step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

The squared norm of the normalized coherent-state projection onto occupancy (m1,…,mr) is consequently exp⁡(−λ)M!∏jmj!2∥Ps,Mx∥2=exp⁡ ⁣(−∑jλj)∏jλjmjmj!=∏j(exp⁡(−λj)λjmjmj!). Each factor sums to one by [F8], so this is a joint probability law that factors into Poisson distributions of means λj. If C=0, all λj=0; [F9] makes the only nonzero outcome the all-zero tuple. The marked frequency intensity is ∣b(n)∣2dΩ(n)dν/ν because ∣f(rn)∣2d3k=∣b(n)∣2dΩ(n)dν/ν under ν=cr.

PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Summing unresolved coherent emissions removes the lower cutoff

Statement

In the defined finite-cutoff coherent model, let 0<ε<Δ<Λ and C≥0. Let Nu and Nr be the counts in the unresolved band (ε,Δ) and resolved band [Δ,Λ), respectively. The exclusive no-emission probability is P(Nu=0,Nr=0)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡Λε). For every n∈N0, P(Nu=n,Nr=0)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡Λε)(Clog⁡Δε)nn!. Summing over all unresolved counts gives the finite-resolution inclusive probability P(Nr=0)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡ΛΔ), which is independent of the lower cutoff ε. This is an exact identity in the defined free coherent model; it does not assert real–virtual cancellation in interacting QED or a detector's empirical response.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model's finite cutoffs 0<ε<Δ<Λ and coefficient C≥0.

[A1]

Independent soft-radiation resolution model: Δ defines unresolved frequencies (ε,Δ) and resolved frequencies [Δ,Λ); all cutoff values are angular frequencies in s−1.

[F1]

Orthogonal frequency bands in the coherent soft model have independent Poisson counts: counts in disjoint frequency bands are independent Poisson variables, with mean C∫Bdν/ν on a band B.

[F2]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: for 0<a<b, log⁡(b/a)=∫abdν/ν; splitting this integral at Δ gives log⁡(Λ/ε)=log⁡(Δ/ε)+log⁡(Λ/Δ).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2algebra

Define λu=C∫εΔdν/ν and λr=C∫ΔΛdν/ν. By [F2], λu=Clog⁡(Δ/ε), λr=Clog⁡(Λ/Δ), and λu+λr=Clog⁡(Λ/ε). The endpoint ν=Δ has zero one-particle measure, so assigning it to the resolved interval does not change either mean.

1.2F1F4givenalgebra

Independence in [F1] gives P(Nu=n,Nr=0)=exp⁡(−λu)λun/n! exp⁡(−λr) for every n∈N0. This also covers C=0: at n=0, the convention 00=1 gives probability one, and at positive n the probability is zero. In particular the case n=0 is the exclusive no-emission probability.

2.1F3step 1.2algebra

Summing the joint probabilities over n and using the everywhere convergent exponential series [F3] gives ∑n=0∞P(Nu=n,Nr=0)=exp⁡(−λu−λr)∑n=0∞λunn!=exp⁡(−λr). The terms are nonnegative and the series is absolutely convergent, so this sum is the probability of the disjoint union of the events {Nu=n,Nr=0}.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substituting λr=Clog⁡(Λ/Δ) from step 1.1 yields P(Nr=0)=exp⁡(−Clog⁡(Λ/Δ)), with no remaining ε. The conclusion is a model deduction from the finite-band Poisson law, not a statement about virtual amplitudes in QED.

Remarks

The sketch records only the interval partition used above; the proof does not rely on the diagram. The boundary frequency Δ is assigned to the resolved interval, and its zero measure is why this convention does not change the calculation.

º"¢¤unresolvedresolved
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Photon number divergence can coexist with finite soft energy

Statement

In the defined coherent model, put fε,Δ=1{ε<ν(k)<Δ}fε,Λ and Ψε,Δ=exp⁡(−∥fε,Δ∥2/2)ϵ(fε,Δ), the normalized coherent Fock vector on the unresolved band (ε,Δ). For C≥0 its mean band count and free-photon energy expectation are EΨε,ΔN(ε,Δ)=Clog⁡Δε,Ψε,Δ∈D(Hγ),⟨Ψε,Δ,HγΨε,Δ⟩=ℏC(Δ−ε), where Hγ=ℏc dΓ(∣k∣) and ν=c∣k∣ is angular frequency. If C>0, the mean number diverges as ε↓0, while the energy expectation remains bounded by ℏCΔ and tends to ℏCΔ. The one-particle displacement has ∥fε,Δ∥2=Clog⁡(Δ/ε); when C>0, it has no limit in one-particle Hilbert norm as ε↓0. If C=0, then b=0 almost everywhere and fε,Δ is the zero one-particle vector at every cutoff, so it converges in that norm to zero. This is an exact free coherent-state model statement; it asserts no empirical photon statistics, no interacting QED limit, and no implication about convergence of a different physical state.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, 0<ε<Δ<Λ, and the current and coherent-state data of the resolved-soft model.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω used by the Fock, measure, and second-quantized suppliers.

[F1]

Independent soft-radiation resolution model: the unresolved-band amplitude is fε,Δ, with angular-frequency variable ν=c∣k∣ and free one-particle energy ℏν. It defines b∈L2(S2,dΩ;R3) and C=∫S2∣b(n)∣2dΩ=∥b∥L22.

[F2]

Orthogonal frequency bands in the coherent soft model have independent Poisson counts: the number of unresolved quanta is Poisson with mean λ=Clog⁡(Δ/ε), and ∥fε,Δ∥2=λ.

[F3]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions and Positive transverse photon one-particle space: the state lies in the symmetric Fock space over the closed transverse one-particle subspace of L2(R3,d3k;C3).

[F4]

Free transverse-photon energy multiplier: the free one-particle energy multiplier is ℏc∣k∣ in J for k in m−1.

[F5]

Second-quantized multipliers, joint spectral measure and exact domains: on an m-particle sector, dΓ(∣k∣) is multiplication by ∑j=1m∣kj∣, with its maximal square-integrability domain. Identify L2(R3,d3k;C3) with scalar L2(R3×{1,2,3},d3k⊗#;C) by (Uu)(k,j)=uj(k), where # is counting measure on {1,2,3}. This is an isometry because its squared norm is ∫R3∑j=13∣uj(k)∣2d3k. The scalar multiplier commutes with PT, so it restricts to the transverse Fock space.

[F7]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: log⁡(Δ/ε)=∫εΔdν/ν.

[F8]

The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument, and exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: exp⁡(x)=∑m≥0xm/m! for real x, with absolute convergence and exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y).

[F9]

The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N and Integer powers am: 0!=1, m!>0, λ0=1, and 0m=0 for positive integer m.

[F10]

Logarithmic coherent infrared tail: finite energy, no Fock limit: for κ>0 and a transverse b∈L2(S2,dΩ;C3) with Cb=∫S2∣b∣2dΩ>0, the normalized coherent vectors associated to 1{δ<∣k∣<κ}∣k∣−3/2b(k/∣k∣) have no strong Fock-space limit as δ↓0.

Proof

1.1F2F8F9givenalgebra

Put λ=Clog⁡(Δ/ε). By [F2], the count distribution is pm=e−λλm/m!. Reindexing the nonnegative series gives EN(ε,Δ)=e−λ∑m≥1mλmm!=λe−λ∑j≥0λjj!=λ. This calculation also gives zero mean when C=0 by [F9].

1.2A1F1F10givenalgebra

If C>0, fix Δ and set κ=Δ/c and δ=ε/c. The Definition's profile fε,Δ is exactly the supplier profile with these cutoffs and the same transverse angular function b; its hypotheses hold because κ>0 and Cb=C>0. Applying [F10] shows that Ψε,Δ has no strong Fock-space limit as ε↓0.

2.1F7step 1.1givenalgebra

If C>0, then for every integer q≥1, whenever ε<Δ 2−q, log⁡(Δ/ε)>qlog⁡2≥q/2, since log⁡2=∫12dt/t≥1/2 by [F7]. Hence Clog⁡(Δ/ε)→∞ as ε↓0. For C=0 the count and its mean remain zero.

2.2A1F3F4F5F8F9step 1.1algebra

Under the isometry in [F5], multiplication by ∣k∣ and by the frequency-band indicator commutes pointwise with PT(k), so the scalar sector multiplier of [F5] restricts to the transverse Fock space. On the support of fε,Δ, 0<ℏc∣k∣<ℏΔ. By [F5], the squared norm of the energy-operator image is bounded by ∥HγΨε,Δ∥2≤(ℏΔ)2e−λ∑m≥0m2λmm!=(ℏΔ)2(λ2+λ)<∞. The identity follows by writing m2=m(m−1)+m and shifting indices in the two exponential series [F8], with [F9] covering λ=0. Thus Ψε,Δ∈D(Hγ).

3.1F1F4F5F6F8step 1.1step 2.2algebra

On sector m, the energy multiplier is the sum of the m one-particle energies. Product tensor pairings make each summand contribute ⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩∥fε,Δ∥2(m−1). Including the coherent-state factor and the sector normalization gives ⟨Ψε,Δ,HγΨε,Δ⟩=e−λ∑m≥1m⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩λm−1m!=⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩, where e−λ∑m≥1mλm−1/m!=1 by [F8]. Polar coordinates [F6], ν=cr, and the definition of C give ⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩=∫A∣b(n)∣2dΩ(n)∫ε/cΔ/cℏc dr=ℏC(Δ−ε). It is bounded by ℏCΔ and tends to that finite value as ε↓0.

4.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

If C=0, [F1] gives ∥b∥L22=0, so b is the zero L2 equivalence class and hence b=0 almost everywhere. The same radial norm calculation in [F2] gives ∥fε,Δ∥2=Clog⁡(Δ/ε). For C>0 this is unbounded as ε↓0 by step 2.1. If fε,Δ had a norm limit f, choose a sequence εj↓0 with ∥fεj,Δ−f∥<1 for all sufficiently large j. The Hilbert-space triangle inequality would then give ∥fεj,Δ∥≤∥f∥+1, contradicting the divergence in step 2.1. For C=0 the displacement is the zero L2 vector at every cutoff by [F2].

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources