Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Photon number divergence can coexist with finite soft energy

Statement

In the defined coherent model, put fε,Δ=1{ε<ν(k)<Δ}fε,Λ and Ψε,Δ=exp⁡(−∥fε,Δ∥2/2)ϵ(fε,Δ), the normalized coherent Fock vector on the unresolved band (ε,Δ). For C≥0 its mean band count and free-photon energy expectation are EΨε,ΔN(ε,Δ)=Clog⁡Δε,Ψε,Δ∈D(Hγ),⟨Ψε,Δ,HγΨε,Δ⟩=ℏC(Δ−ε), where Hγ=ℏc dΓ(∣k∣) and ν=c∣k∣ is angular frequency. If C>0, the mean number diverges as ε↓0, while the energy expectation remains bounded by ℏCΔ and tends to ℏCΔ. The one-particle displacement has ∥fε,Δ∥2=Clog⁡(Δ/ε); when C>0, it has no limit in one-particle Hilbert norm as ε↓0. If C=0, then b=0 almost everywhere and fε,Δ is the zero one-particle vector at every cutoff, so it converges in that norm to zero. This is an exact free coherent-state model statement; it asserts no empirical photon statistics, no interacting QED limit, and no implication about convergence of a different physical state.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, 0<ε<Δ<Λ, and the current and coherent-state data of the resolved-soft model.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω used by the Fock, measure, and second-quantized suppliers.

[F1]

Independent soft-radiation resolution model: the unresolved-band amplitude is fε,Δ, with angular-frequency variable ν=c∣k∣ and free one-particle energy ℏν. It defines b∈L2(S2,dΩ;R3) and C=∫S2∣b(n)∣2dΩ=∥b∥L22.

[F2]

Orthogonal frequency bands in the coherent soft model have independent Poisson counts: the number of unresolved quanta is Poisson with mean λ=Clog⁡(Δ/ε), and ∥fε,Δ∥2=λ.

[F3]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions and Positive transverse photon one-particle space: the state lies in the symmetric Fock space over the closed transverse one-particle subspace of L2(R3,d3k;C3).

[F4]

Free transverse-photon energy multiplier: the free one-particle energy multiplier is ℏc∣k∣ in J for k in m−1.

[F5]

Second-quantized multipliers, joint spectral measure and exact domains: on an m-particle sector, dΓ(∣k∣) is multiplication by ∑j=1m∣kj∣, with its maximal square-integrability domain. Identify L2(R3,d3k;C3) with scalar L2(R3×{1,2,3},d3k⊗#;C) by (Uu)(k,j)=uj(k), where # is counting measure on {1,2,3}. This is an isometry because its squared norm is ∫R3∑j=13∣uj(k)∣2d3k. The scalar multiplier commutes with PT, so it restricts to the transverse Fock space.

[F7]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: log⁡(Δ/ε)=∫εΔdν/ν.

[F8]

The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument, and exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: exp⁡(x)=∑m≥0xm/m! for real x, with absolute convergence and exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y).

[F9]

The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N and Integer powers am: 0!=1, m!>0, λ0=1, and 0m=0 for positive integer m.

[F10]

Logarithmic coherent infrared tail: finite energy, no Fock limit: for κ>0 and a transverse b∈L2(S2,dΩ;C3) with Cb=∫S2∣b∣2dΩ>0, the normalized coherent vectors associated to 1{δ<∣k∣<κ}∣k∣−3/2b(k/∣k∣) have no strong Fock-space limit as δ↓0.

Proof

1.1F2F8F9givenalgebra

Put λ=Clog⁡(Δ/ε). By [F2], the count distribution is pm=e−λλm/m!. Reindexing the nonnegative series gives EN(ε,Δ)=e−λ∑m≥1mλmm!=λe−λ∑j≥0λjj!=λ. This calculation also gives zero mean when C=0 by [F9].

1.2A1F1F10givenalgebra

If C>0, fix Δ and set κ=Δ/c and δ=ε/c. The Definition's profile fε,Δ is exactly the supplier profile with these cutoffs and the same transverse angular function b; its hypotheses hold because κ>0 and Cb=C>0. Applying [F10] shows that Ψε,Δ has no strong Fock-space limit as ε↓0.

2.1F7step 1.1givenalgebra

If C>0, then for every integer q≥1, whenever ε<Δ 2−q, log⁡(Δ/ε)>qlog⁡2≥q/2, since log⁡2=∫12dt/t≥1/2 by [F7]. Hence Clog⁡(Δ/ε)→∞ as ε↓0. For C=0 the count and its mean remain zero.

2.2A1F3F4F5F8F9step 1.1algebra

Under the isometry in [F5], multiplication by ∣k∣ and by the frequency-band indicator commutes pointwise with PT(k), so the scalar sector multiplier of [F5] restricts to the transverse Fock space. On the support of fε,Δ, 0<ℏc∣k∣<ℏΔ. By [F5], the squared norm of the energy-operator image is bounded by ∥HγΨε,Δ∥2≤(ℏΔ)2e−λ∑m≥0m2λmm!=(ℏΔ)2(λ2+λ)<∞. The identity follows by writing m2=m(m−1)+m and shifting indices in the two exponential series [F8], with [F9] covering λ=0. Thus Ψε,Δ∈D(Hγ).

3.1F1F4F5F6F8step 1.1step 2.2algebra

On sector m, the energy multiplier is the sum of the m one-particle energies. Product tensor pairings make each summand contribute ⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩∥fε,Δ∥2(m−1). Including the coherent-state factor and the sector normalization gives ⟨Ψε,Δ,HγΨε,Δ⟩=e−λ∑m≥1m⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩λm−1m!=⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩, where e−λ∑m≥1mλm−1/m!=1 by [F8]. Polar coordinates [F6], ν=cr, and the definition of C give ⟨fε,Δ,ℏc∣k∣fε,Δ⟩=∫A∣b(n)∣2dΩ(n)∫ε/cΔ/cℏc dr=ℏC(Δ−ε). It is bounded by ℏCΔ and tends to that finite value as ε↓0.

4.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

If C=0, [F1] gives ∥b∥L22=0, so b is the zero L2 equivalence class and hence b=0 almost everywhere. The same radial norm calculation in [F2] gives ∥fε,Δ∥2=Clog⁡(Δ/ε). For C>0 this is unbounded as ε↓0 by step 2.1. If fε,Δ had a norm limit f, choose a sequence εj↓0 with ∥fεj,Δ−f∥<1 for all sufficiently large j. The Hilbert-space triangle inequality would then give ∥fεj,Δ∥≤∥f∥+1, contradicting the divergence in step 2.1. For C=0 the displacement is the zero L2 vector at every cutoff by [F2].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources