Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Soft coherent radiation, resolution and inclusive cancellation — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Detector resolution changes a finite inclusive event

Example

In the finite-cutoff coherent model, fix C>0 and 0<ε<Δ<Λ. The probability of no resolved emission is P(Δ)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Clog⁡ΛΔ). For any two thresholds Δ1<Δ2 in (ε,Λ), P(Δ1)<P(Δ2). This is an exact model law, not a reported detector count or an empirical estimate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: C>0 and 0<ε<Δ1<Δ2<Λ in the defined coherent model.

[F1]

Summing unresolved coherent emissions removes the lower cutoff: for every threshold Δ, the no-resolved-emission probability is exp⁡(−Clog⁡(Λ/Δ)).

[F2]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: log⁡(b/a)=∫abdν/ν for 0<a<b.

[F3]

The exponential function is strictly increasing: the real exponential is strictly increasing.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

By [F1], P(Δj)=exp⁡(−Clog⁡(Λ/Δj)) for j=1,2. By [F2], log⁡(Λ/Δ1)−log⁡(Λ/Δ2)=∫Δ1Δ2dν/ν>0, so −Clog⁡(Λ/Δ2)>−Clog⁡(Λ/Δ1) because C>0.

2.1F3step 1.1∎

Apply strict monotonicity [F3] to the two real exponents in step 1.1. It gives P(Δ2)>P(Δ1). This compares two predictions of the specified model and asserts no empirical observation.

Sources