Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential channel thermality and greybody filtered occupations

Statement

In the channel defined above, let s=u−v and let ω be angular frequency in seconds−1. Its two-point distribution in centered time is Ck(s)=−k216πcsch⁡2(k2(s−i0)). Its Fourier spectrum, using C^k(ω)=∫RCk(s)e−iωs ds in the distributional sense, is Sk(ω)=ω2(e2πω/k−1)(ω≠0),Sk(0)=k4π. Thus the precise detailed-balance relation at strip width θ=2π/k seconds is Sk(−ω)=eθωSk(ω) for every ω>0. No measured temperature is assigned.

Separately, for each fixed ω>0, give C the second-variable-linear Hilbert inner product ⟨z,w⟩C=zˉw, so 1∈C is a unit vector, and put F=Fs(C). Write ∣m⟩ for the normalized vector in its m-particle sector, with ∣0⟩=Ω; the annihilation map satisfies aC(1)∣m⟩=m ∣m−1⟩ on finite-particle vectors. Its maximal closed domain is D(aC(1))={∑m≥0ψm∣m⟩:∑m≥0m∣ψm∣2<∞}. Let Γ:(0,∞)→[0,1] be any pointwise transmissivity function; no measurability is needed because every assertion below is mode-by-mode. Every square root below denotes the unique nonnegative real square root, which exists for each nonnegative argument in the usual Dedekind-complete ordered field R. Let H=F⊗^F with product basis ∣m,n⟩=∣m⟩⊗∣n⟩. The tensor-factor annihilation operators a=aC(1)⊗I and e=I⊗aC(1) act on basis vectors by a∣m,n⟩=m ∣m−1,n⟩ and e∣m,n⟩=n ∣m,n−1⟩, with a zero result when the corresponding index is zero, and have domains D(a)={∑m,n≥0cmn∣m,n⟩:∑m,n≥0m∣cmn∣2<∞},D(e)={∑m,n≥0cmn∣m,n⟩:∑m,n≥0n∣cmn∣2<∞}. On their common domain D:=D(a)∩D(e) define, for each ω, the two output operators by the following linear transformation, with D(bω)=D(dω)=D: bω=Γ(ω) a+1−Γ(ω) e. The complementary output is dω=−1−Γ(ω) a+Γ(ω) e, also defined on D. Let Dfin=span⁡{∣m,n⟩:m,n∈N0} be the algebraic finite-particle subspace. It is contained in D and invariant under a,e and their creation operators; on it define bω†=Γ(ω) a†+1−Γ(ω) e† and dω†=−1−Γ(ω) a†+Γ(ω) e† as the corresponding creation combinations. Let ψω∈D(aC(1)) be a normalized signal vector and put the environment in its unit vacuum vector Ωe=∣0⟩. Then Ψω:=ψω⊗Ωe lies in D: if ψω=∑mψm∣m⟩, the a-domain sum is ∑mm∣ψm∣2<∞ and the e-domain sum is zero. Put nω=∥aC(1)ψω∥2<∞ and define the output occupation by the quadratic form nout(ω):=∥bωΨω∥2. Then nout(ω)=Γ(ω)nω. For the Planck occupation function nθ(ω)=(exp⁡(θω)−1)−1 with width θ>0 measured in seconds, one has nθ(ω)>0 for every ω>0. Consequently, a filter preserving this same width at every positive frequency must satisfy Γ(ω)nθ(ω)=nθ(ω) and hence Γ(ω)=1 at every ω. Frequency-dependent filtering can nevertheless preserve Planck form at another width: Γ∗(ω)=(exp⁡(θω)+1)−1 lies in (0,1) and varies with ω, while Γ∗(ω)nθ(ω)=n2θ(ω). This is an algebraic channel statement; it does not identify Γ with a four-dimensional black-hole scattering coefficient.

Channel diagram

The diagram represents the two input annihilation modes and the real orthogonal transformation to the output modes. Its matrix entries and the vacuum-environment condition are fixed by the Statement; the occupation and commutator claims are proved algebraically below.

a!e!R¡(!)b!d!

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k>0 seconds−1, the positive coordinate conversion χ, Countable Choice, and the mode hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice for the supplied Fock and contour constructions; no stronger choice principle is used. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Specified chiral collapse channel defines the exponential-coordinate current, its lower-boundary convention, and its positive-type vacuum pairing.

[F2]

Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model fixes the i0 occurrence of csch⁡2 as a smooth-pullback distribution, not a pointwise value, and gives the canonical length-coordinate channel covariance −κ216πcsch⁡2(κ(s−i0)/2) for κ>0.

[F3]

Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance gives the spectrum SA,b(Ω)=2π(A/b2)Ω/(eπΩ/b−1), its removable value at zero, and SA,b(−Ω)=e(π/b)ΩSA,b(Ω) for Ω>0.

[F4]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions defines Fs(H) as the square-summable direct sum of symmetric particle sectors, its vacuum, and the finite-particle subspace, with the bosonic creation and annihilation sector maps on that subspace.

[F5]

Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains gives the maximal closed domain D(a(h))={Ψ:∑m≥1∥am(h)Ψm∥2<∞} for each bosonic annihilation operator, states that the finite-particle subspace is a graph core, and gives the canonical commutation relations there. For H=C and h=1, its sector formulas yield aC(1)∣m⟩=m∣m−1⟩ and the displayed weighted-square-summability domain; on the tensor product, applying the same factor operator in every second-factor sector gives the displayed domain of a, and likewise for e.

[F6]

The real exponential function and the number e by a power series defines the real exponential and gives exp⁡(0)=1.

[F9]

Mean value theorem on a closed real interval gives the mean-value equality on every nondegenerate closed real interval.

[F10]

The exponential addition formula exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y) gives exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y).

[F11]

Nonnegative real square roots exist uniquely: in the usual Dedekind-complete ordered field R, every nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root. The real coefficients Γ(ω) and 1−Γ(ω) satisfy its nonnegativity hypothesis.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

Put τ=χu, x(τ)=χU(τ/χ), and κ=k/χ. Then x(τ)=χUH+Ak(−κ−1e−κτ). The coefficient λ=Ak is positive. For Cϵ(s)=−(4π)−1(s−iϵ)−2, the exact identity λ2Cϵ(λs)=Cϵ/λ(s) shows that a positive affine rescaling and translation leave the lower-boundary covariance unchanged. By [F1]–[F2], the canonical length-coordinate covariance is Cκ. Returning to seconds multiplies its kernel by χ2, so Ck(s)=χ2Cκ(χs)=−k216πcsch⁡2(k2(s−i0)).

1.2A1givenF4F5F11algebra

Fix ω and write Γ=Γ(ω), α=Γ, and β=1−Γ. By [F11], α,β∈R are the unique nonnegative roots and α2+β2=Γ+(1−Γ)=1. Hence the matrix (Γ1−Γ−1−ΓΓ) is real orthogonal. The tensor-factor operators commute on Dfin; expanding their commutators and applying [F5] gives [b,b†]=[d,d†]=I and [b,d†]=[b,d]=0 on that core. Since Ψω∈D, the operator bΨω is defined, and bΨω=α(aC(1)ψω)⊗Ωe+β ψω⊗(eΩe). The environment term vanishes because eΩe=0. Therefore nout(ω)=∥bΨω∥2=α2∥aC(1)ψω∥2=Γnω, by the quadratic-form definition in the Statement.

2.1A1F3step 1.1algebra

In [F3] take A=κ2/(16π) and b=κ/2. For the seconds-frequency variable, Fourier change of variables gives Sk(ω)=χSκ(ω/χ), hence Sk(ω)=ω/[2(e2πω/k−1)] away from zero and Sk(0)=χκ/(4π)=k/(4π). Substitution of −ω and cancellation of the common factor gives Sk(−ω)=e2πω/kSk(ω) for ω>0.

3.1F6F7F8F9F10step 1.2algebra∎

Put x=θω>0. By the mean-value theorem [F9] on [0,x], for some c∈(0,x), exp⁡(x)−exp⁡(0)=xexp⁡′(c)=xexp⁡(c)>0, using [F8] and [F7]; [F6] gives exp⁡(0)=1. Hence nθ(ω)>0 and 0<Γ∗(ω)<1. If any filter has Γ(ω)nθ(ω)=nθ(ω) at every positive frequency, division by this positive value gives Γ(ω)=1 everywhere, so no nonconstant filter preserves the same width. If 0<ω1<ω2, applying [F9] on [θω1,θω2] gives exp⁡(θω2)−exp⁡(θω1)=θ(ω2−ω1)exp⁡′(c)>0 for some intermediate c, by [F8] and [F7]. Thus Γ∗ is nonconstant. By [F10], exp⁡(2x)−1=(exp⁡(x)−1)(exp⁡(x)+1); therefore Γ∗(ω)nθ(ω)=1/(exp⁡(2x)−1)=n2θ(ω). The varying filter can thus produce a Planck occupation at a different width.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources