Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Collapse ray tracing and greybody separation

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Specified chiral collapse channel

Definition

Fix an upper endpoint UH∈R and a scale A>0, both measured in seconds, and let k>0 be measured in seconds−1. Let u∈R be the outgoing coordinate, measured in seconds, and define U(u)=UH−Ae−ku. Then U is a smooth increasing diffeomorphism from R onto (−∞,UH), with derivative U′(u)=Ake−ku>0; UH is only the upper-endpoint label in this channel. Let χ>0 be a fixed conversion factor with units of length per second, and put ℓ(u)=χU(u) and ℓH=χUH. For g∈Cc∞(R;C), let uℓ be the smooth inverse of ℓ and define fg(x)=g(uℓ(x)) for x<ℓH, and fg(x)=0 for x≥ℓH. The support of g is compact, so fg∈Cc∞(R;C). Define the channel current j(g)=J(fg) using the Fock-vacuum chiral current J, and set W(g,h)=⟨Ω,J(fg‾)J(fh)Ω⟩2. The associated two-point distribution is the diffeomorphism pullback of the supplied length-coordinate kernel Cℓ(X−Y)=−14π(X−Y−i0)−2; in seconds coordinates its kernel is K(u,v)=U′(u)U′(v)[−14π(U(u)−U(v)−i0)−2]. Here i0 is the lower boundary obtained by testing the regularizations −14π(s−iϵ)−2 as ϵ↓0, and the pullback is defined by the smooth diffeomorphism, not by pointwise evaluation on the diagonal. The tested form is of positive type: W(g,g)≥0 for every g.

For real-valued tests g1,…,gn, write Mn(g1,…,gn)=⟨Ω,J(fg1)⋯J(fgn)Ω⟩2. This Fock-vacuum field is Gaussian in the precise sense that Mn=0 for odd n, while for even n it is the sum over pair partitions π of {1,…,n} of ∏(i,j)∈π, i<jM2(gi,gj), with each contraction ordered as displayed. This is an exact one-dimensional test-coordinate channel; it does not assert existence of four-dimensional collapse scattering.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: UH∈R, A,k,χ>0, the seconds coordinate u, compact smooth tests, and Countable Choice.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, and no stronger choice principle. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model defines the positive-frequency Fock current on compact smooth tests, gives its vacuum covariance Cℓ(s)=−14π(s−i0)−2 as a positive-type distribution, and constructs the canonical coordinate Uκ(τ)=−κ−1e−κτ from R onto (−∞,0), with smooth inverse Uκ−1(X)=−κ−1log⁡(−κX) and derivative Uκ′(τ)=e−κτ>0. Its proof establishes this diffeomorphism and its lower-boundary pullback in step 4.1.

[F2]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions fixes the bosonic Fock vacuum, the finite-particle domain, and the creation and annihilation formulas; its construction assumes Countable Choice.

[F3]

Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains gives the bosonic commutation relations on the finite-particle domain, including [a(h),a†(q)]=⟨h,q⟩2I.

[F4]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions gives the Lebesgue change-of-variables formula for a C1 diffeomorphism between open sets.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2constructalgebra

Put τ=χu, κ=k/χ, xH=χUH, and λ=Ak>0. In the length coordinate τ, the map x(τ):=ℓ(τ/χ) satisfies x(τ)=xH+λUκ(τ), since λUκ(τ)=−χAe−κτ. By [F1], Uκ is a smooth increasing diffeomorphism from R onto (−∞,0); the positive affine map y↦xH+λy is a smooth diffeomorphism from (−∞,0) onto (−∞,xH). Since u↦τ=χu is also a positive linear diffeomorphism, ℓ is a smooth increasing diffeomorphism from R onto (−∞,ℓH), with smooth inverse uℓ(x)=χ−1Uκ−1((x−xH)/λ). Differentiating the supplied coordinate formula gives ℓ′(u)=χλe−κχu=χAke−ku and hence U′(u)=Ake−ku>0. If supp⁡g⊆[a,b], then supp⁡fg⊆[ℓ(a),ℓ(b)]⊂(−∞,ℓH), so the zero extension is smooth and compactly supported. Thus J(fg) is defined by [F1]–[F2].

2.1A1F1F4step 1.1algebra

The map (u,v)↦(ℓ(u),ℓ(v)) is a smooth diffeomorphism, so [F4] transports the two-variable test pairing with Jacobian ℓ′(u)ℓ′(v). Since ℓ=χU, the regularized identity χ2[−(4π)−1(χs−iϵ)−2]=−(4π)−1(s−iϵ/χ)−2 shows that the positive unit scale cancels in the boundary distribution, giving the stated seconds-coordinate kernel. Positivity is the supplied Fock norm identity W(g,g)=∥hfg∥22≥0 from [F1].

3.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

On the finite-particle domain, the left vacuum annihilates every creation term and the right vacuum is annihilated by every annihilation operator. Commuting the annihilation part of the leftmost J(fg1) through the later fields, [F3] replaces each commutator by its scalar two-point contraction; the term with the annihilator reaching the right vacuum vanishes. Hence Mn(g1,…,gn)=∑j=2nM2(g1,gj) Mn−2(g2,…,gj^,…,gn). The base cases are M0=1 and M1=0. Induction gives zero for odd n and the stated sum over pair partitions for even n.

PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Exponential channel thermality and greybody filtered occupations

Statement

In the channel defined above, let s=u−v and let ω be angular frequency in seconds−1. Its two-point distribution in centered time is Ck(s)=−k216πcsch⁡2(k2(s−i0)). Its Fourier spectrum, using C^k(ω)=∫RCk(s)e−iωs ds in the distributional sense, is Sk(ω)=ω2(e2πω/k−1)(ω≠0),Sk(0)=k4π. Thus the precise detailed-balance relation at strip width θ=2π/k seconds is Sk(−ω)=eθωSk(ω) for every ω>0. No measured temperature is assigned.

Separately, for each fixed ω>0, give C the second-variable-linear Hilbert inner product ⟨z,w⟩C=zˉw, so 1∈C is a unit vector, and put F=Fs(C). Write ∣m⟩ for the normalized vector in its m-particle sector, with ∣0⟩=Ω; the annihilation map satisfies aC(1)∣m⟩=m ∣m−1⟩ on finite-particle vectors. Its maximal closed domain is D(aC(1))={∑m≥0ψm∣m⟩:∑m≥0m∣ψm∣2<∞}. Let Γ:(0,∞)→[0,1] be any pointwise transmissivity function; no measurability is needed because every assertion below is mode-by-mode. Every square root below denotes the unique nonnegative real square root, which exists for each nonnegative argument in the usual Dedekind-complete ordered field R. Let H=F⊗^F with product basis ∣m,n⟩=∣m⟩⊗∣n⟩. The tensor-factor annihilation operators a=aC(1)⊗I and e=I⊗aC(1) act on basis vectors by a∣m,n⟩=m ∣m−1,n⟩ and e∣m,n⟩=n ∣m,n−1⟩, with a zero result when the corresponding index is zero, and have domains D(a)={∑m,n≥0cmn∣m,n⟩:∑m,n≥0m∣cmn∣2<∞},D(e)={∑m,n≥0cmn∣m,n⟩:∑m,n≥0n∣cmn∣2<∞}. On their common domain D:=D(a)∩D(e) define, for each ω, the two output operators by the following linear transformation, with D(bω)=D(dω)=D: bω=Γ(ω) a+1−Γ(ω) e. The complementary output is dω=−1−Γ(ω) a+Γ(ω) e, also defined on D. Let Dfin=span⁡{∣m,n⟩:m,n∈N0} be the algebraic finite-particle subspace. It is contained in D and invariant under a,e and their creation operators; on it define bω†=Γ(ω) a†+1−Γ(ω) e† and dω†=−1−Γ(ω) a†+Γ(ω) e† as the corresponding creation combinations. Let ψω∈D(aC(1)) be a normalized signal vector and put the environment in its unit vacuum vector Ωe=∣0⟩. Then Ψω:=ψω⊗Ωe lies in D: if ψω=∑mψm∣m⟩, the a-domain sum is ∑mm∣ψm∣2<∞ and the e-domain sum is zero. Put nω=∥aC(1)ψω∥2<∞ and define the output occupation by the quadratic form nout(ω):=∥bωΨω∥2. Then nout(ω)=Γ(ω)nω. For the Planck occupation function nθ(ω)=(exp⁡(θω)−1)−1 with width θ>0 measured in seconds, one has nθ(ω)>0 for every ω>0. Consequently, a filter preserving this same width at every positive frequency must satisfy Γ(ω)nθ(ω)=nθ(ω) and hence Γ(ω)=1 at every ω. Frequency-dependent filtering can nevertheless preserve Planck form at another width: Γ∗(ω)=(exp⁡(θω)+1)−1 lies in (0,1) and varies with ω, while Γ∗(ω)nθ(ω)=n2θ(ω). This is an algebraic channel statement; it does not identify Γ with a four-dimensional black-hole scattering coefficient.

Channel diagram

The diagram represents the two input annihilation modes and the real orthogonal transformation to the output modes. Its matrix entries and the vacuum-environment condition are fixed by the Statement; the occupation and commutator claims are proved algebraically below.

a!e!R¡(!)b!d!

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k>0 seconds−1, the positive coordinate conversion χ, Countable Choice, and the mode hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice for the supplied Fock and contour constructions; no stronger choice principle is used. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Specified chiral collapse channel defines the exponential-coordinate current, its lower-boundary convention, and its positive-type vacuum pairing.

[F2]

Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model fixes the i0 occurrence of csch⁡2 as a smooth-pullback distribution, not a pointwise value, and gives the canonical length-coordinate channel covariance −κ216πcsch⁡2(κ(s−i0)/2) for κ>0.

[F3]

Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance gives the spectrum SA,b(Ω)=2π(A/b2)Ω/(eπΩ/b−1), its removable value at zero, and SA,b(−Ω)=e(π/b)ΩSA,b(Ω) for Ω>0.

[F4]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions defines Fs(H) as the square-summable direct sum of symmetric particle sectors, its vacuum, and the finite-particle subspace, with the bosonic creation and annihilation sector maps on that subspace.

[F5]

Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains gives the maximal closed domain D(a(h))={Ψ:∑m≥1∥am(h)Ψm∥2<∞} for each bosonic annihilation operator, states that the finite-particle subspace is a graph core, and gives the canonical commutation relations there. For H=C and h=1, its sector formulas yield aC(1)∣m⟩=m∣m−1⟩ and the displayed weighted-square-summability domain; on the tensor product, applying the same factor operator in every second-factor sector gives the displayed domain of a, and likewise for e.

[F6]

The real exponential function and the number e by a power series defines the real exponential and gives exp⁡(0)=1.

[F9]

Mean value theorem on a closed real interval gives the mean-value equality on every nondegenerate closed real interval.

[F10]

The exponential addition formula exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y) gives exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y).

[F11]

Nonnegative real square roots exist uniquely: in the usual Dedekind-complete ordered field R, every nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root. The real coefficients Γ(ω) and 1−Γ(ω) satisfy its nonnegativity hypothesis.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

Put τ=χu, x(τ)=χU(τ/χ), and κ=k/χ. Then x(τ)=χUH+Ak(−κ−1e−κτ). The coefficient λ=Ak is positive. For Cϵ(s)=−(4π)−1(s−iϵ)−2, the exact identity λ2Cϵ(λs)=Cϵ/λ(s) shows that a positive affine rescaling and translation leave the lower-boundary covariance unchanged. By [F1]–[F2], the canonical length-coordinate covariance is Cκ. Returning to seconds multiplies its kernel by χ2, so Ck(s)=χ2Cκ(χs)=−k216πcsch⁡2(k2(s−i0)).

1.2A1givenF4F5F11algebra

Fix ω and write Γ=Γ(ω), α=Γ, and β=1−Γ. By [F11], α,β∈R are the unique nonnegative roots and α2+β2=Γ+(1−Γ)=1. Hence the matrix (Γ1−Γ−1−ΓΓ) is real orthogonal. The tensor-factor operators commute on Dfin; expanding their commutators and applying [F5] gives [b,b†]=[d,d†]=I and [b,d†]=[b,d]=0 on that core. Since Ψω∈D, the operator bΨω is defined, and bΨω=α(aC(1)ψω)⊗Ωe+β ψω⊗(eΩe). The environment term vanishes because eΩe=0. Therefore nout(ω)=∥bΨω∥2=α2∥aC(1)ψω∥2=Γnω, by the quadratic-form definition in the Statement.

2.1A1F3step 1.1algebra

In [F3] take A=κ2/(16π) and b=κ/2. For the seconds-frequency variable, Fourier change of variables gives Sk(ω)=χSκ(ω/χ), hence Sk(ω)=ω/[2(e2πω/k−1)] away from zero and Sk(0)=χκ/(4π)=k/(4π). Substitution of −ω and cancellation of the common factor gives Sk(−ω)=e2πω/kSk(ω) for ω>0.

3.1F6F7F8F9F10step 1.2algebra∎

Put x=θω>0. By the mean-value theorem [F9] on [0,x], for some c∈(0,x), exp⁡(x)−exp⁡(0)=xexp⁡′(c)=xexp⁡(c)>0, using [F8] and [F7]; [F6] gives exp⁡(0)=1. Hence nθ(ω)>0 and 0<Γ∗(ω)<1. If any filter has Γ(ω)nθ(ω)=nθ(ω) at every positive frequency, division by this positive value gives Γ(ω)=1 everywhere, so no nonconstant filter preserves the same width. If 0<ω1<ω2, applying [F9] on [θω1,θω2] gives exp⁡(θω2)−exp⁡(θω1)=θ(ω2−ω1)exp⁡′(c)>0 for some intermediate c, by [F8] and [F7]. Thus Γ∗ is nonconstant. By [F10], exp⁡(2x)−1=(exp⁡(x)−1)(exp⁡(x)+1); therefore Γ∗(ω)nθ(ω)=1/(exp⁡(2x)−1)=n2θ(ω). The varying filter can thus produce a Planck occupation at a different width.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources