Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Drude conductivity, passive energy and plasma cutoff

Physical scope

Conditional harmonic response and transverse bulk dispersion for the phenomenological Drude current closure in a fixed homogeneous material rest frame. The energy statement is conditional on the proved Drude branch of the augmented-energy theorem and the smooth finite-energy Maxwell model. The cutoff applies to nonzero real-wavevector transverse bulk modes in the collisionless branch only; it asserts no interface modes, longitudinal plasma oscillations, experimental validation or microscopic carrier theory.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, the hypothesis carried by the finite-energy Maxwell supplier. Work in a fixed homogeneous material rest frame in SI and standard right-handed Cartesian coordinates with orthonormal basis x^,y^,z^. Let ε∞>0 be in F m−1, μ>0 in H m−1, a>0 in F m−1 s−2, and γ≥0 in s−1 as in the adopted Drude current closure. For a spatially uniform harmonic electric field E(t)=Re⁡(ee−iωt), with ω>0 in s−1 and e in V m−1, consider the harmonic particular solution of the Drude equations, written V(t)=Re⁡(ve−iωt) and P(t)=Re⁡(pe−iωt), where v is in A m−2 and p is in C m−2. The frequency-domain response below refers to this harmonic particular solution; arbitrary initial data may add homogeneous solutions, which are not included in these amplitudes. The conductivity σ(ω) is the complex scalar mapping e to v, in S m−1, and the absolute permittivity ε(ω) is the scalar mapping e to the displacement amplitude in D=ε∞E+P, in F m−1.

For every ω>0,

σ(ω)=aγ−iω,Re⁡σ(ω)=aγγ2+ω2≥0,ε(ω)=ε∞−aω(ω+iγ).

The carrier energy density and the loss term in the smooth Maxwell energy balance are ∣V∣2/(2a) and γ∣V∣2/a, respectively; the energy density has units J m−3 and the loss density has units W m−3.

In the collisionless branch γ=0, set ωp:=a/ε∞>0 (so ωp is in s−1). For a source-free nonzero transverse bulk plane wave with real k∈R3∖{0} in m−1, frequency ω>0 in s−1, and nonzero complex electric amplitude e satisfying k⋅e=0, the Maxwell amplitude equations imply

∣k∣2=με∞(ω2−ωp2).

Thus ω>ωp admits source-free transverse modes with nonzero real wavevectors, while 0<ω<ωp admits none with real wavevector. Extending the same harmonic ansatz to a complex wave number κ in m−1 along a coordinate z in m, the positive-imaginary branch below cutoff gives a transverse mode that decays exponentially as z increases; this is the evanescent meaning used here. At ω=ωp the symbol gives k=0, outside the stated nonzero-wavevector plane-wave class; no claim about the separate spatially uniform endpoint or longitudinal plasma oscillations is made.

Diagram

This schematic projects a right-handed orthonormal triad for the real-wavevector transverse mode: k is along +z^, the electric amplitude e is along x^, and the magnetic-induction amplitude b is along +y^. The axes are drawn in a two-dimensional projection; their right-handed three-dimensional convention is stated above. The mode construction and cross-product signs are proved in steps 3.1–4.1. The diagram does not depict the below-cutoff complex wave number as a real vector.

\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth,scale=1.0]
  \draw[->,gray] (0,0) -- (2.4,0) node[below] {$\hat x$};
  \draw[->,gray] (0,0) -- (0.6,1.1) node[above right] {$\hat y$};
  \draw[->,gray] (0,0) -- (0,2.3) node[left] {$\hat z$};
  \draw[->,thick,blue] (0,0) -- (1.8,0) node[below=4pt] {$e$};
  \draw[->,thick,green!60!black] (0,0) -- (0.45,0.82) node[above right] {$b$};
  \draw[->,thick,red] (0,0) -- (0,1.8) node[left=4pt] {$k$};
\end{tikzpicture}

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the real Drude state equations Pt=V, Vt+γV=aE, D=ε∞E+P, B=μH in the material rest frame; the smooth macroscopic Maxwell equations in that framework; the SI constants and units; ω>0; for the frequency-domain response, the harmonic particular solution rather than a general solution with arbitrary initial data; and, for the plane-wave claim, a source-free nonzero transverse harmonic mode with real k≠0.

[A1]

The free-carrier current and polarization obey Pt=V, Vt+γV=aE with a>0, γ≥0; D=ε∞E+P and B=μH with constant positive scalars; the initial polarization is separately specified (Drude current closure and collisionless limit). The frequency-domain calculation uses the harmonic particular solution, not a general initial-state solution.

[A2]

In the smooth macroscopic model, curl⁡E=−∂tB and curl⁡H=Jf+∂tD, with the free sources and the D,H definitions of the framework (The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources, clause (b)).

[F1]

The real plane-wave encoding uses E(x,t)=Re⁡(eei(k⋅x−ωt)) and B(x,t)=Re⁡(bei(k⋅x−ωt)), with real k≠0, ω>0, and complex amplitudes; the componentwise exponential encoding is real-field notation (Real plane-wave fields encoded by complex amplitudes).

[F2]

For real vectors, k×(k×e)=k(k⋅e)−∣k∣2e; extending the cross product complex-bilinearly in the amplitude preserves this componentwise identity (The vector triple product identity u×(v×w)=⟨u,w⟩v−⟨u,v⟩w).

[F3]

Countable Choice is the set-theoretic assumption used by the finite-energy Maxwell energy supplier and is carried through the augmented-energy result (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Augmented energy and passive absorption).

[L1]

The current augmented-energy carrier's Drude branch gives carrier storage ∣V∣2/(2a) and local loss γ∣V∣2/a when Pt=V and Vt+γV=aE. Its complete current proof has been inspected; this use retains the exact weak-Poynting and Countable Choice hypotheses declared there (Augmented energy and passive absorption, Drude branch of the Statement and Proof).

Proof

technique · solve the first-order current equation in harmonic form, use the established conditional Drude energy branch, then substitute the collisionless response into the smooth Maxwell plane-wave symbol
1.1givenA1algebra

On the harmonic particular solution with e−iωt time dependence, Vt has amplitude −iωv, so (γ−iω)v=ae. The scalar γ−iω is nonzero because its imaginary part is −ω≠0; hence the vector equation gives v=(a/(γ−iω))e, including when e=0. The conductivity is the scalar multiplier σ(ω):=a/(γ−iω) of this linear map. Multiplying numerator and denominator by γ+iω gives Re⁡σ=aγ/(γ2+ω2)≥0.

1.2A1F3L1

The Drude branch in [L1] applies to precisely the state equations in [A1] under Countable Choice [F3]; it gives the material energy ∣V∣2/(2a) and loss γ∣V∣2/a. Together with the field energy in that same balance, these are nonnegative storage and dissipation because a>0 and γ≥0. This is a deduction within the adopted model, conditional on [L1]'s Maxwell-energy prerequisite.

2.1givenA1step 1.1algebra

The equation Pt=V gives −iωp=v. Combining with step 1.1, p=a(−iω)(γ−iω)e=−aω(ω+iγ)e. Because D=ε∞E+P, its harmonic amplitude is (ε∞−a/[ω(ω+iγ)])e, which is the stated absolute permittivity.

3.1givenA1A2F1F2F4step 2.1algebra

In the collisionless case, step 2.1 gives ε(ω)=ε∞−a/ω2=ε∞(1−ωp2/ω2). For the encoded plane wave [F1], differentiating the phase gives the amplitude equations k×e=ωb and k×h=−ωε(ω)e, where b=μh; the real-field equality is equivalent to equality of the complex amplitudes since the phase ranges over all real values. Substitution yields k×(k×e)=−μω2ε(ω)e. By k⋅e=0 and [F2], the left side is −∣k∣2e; since e≠0, cancellation gives ∣k∣2=μω2ε(ω)=με∞(ω2−ωp2). If 0<ω<ωp this right side is negative, impossible for real k. If ω>ωp, define k0=με∞(ω2−ωp2)>0 by [F4], set k=k0z^, e=x^, b=(k0/ω)y^, and h=b/μ. Then k⋅e=k⋅b=0, k×e=ωb, and k×h=−k02e/(μω)=−ωε(ω)e, so both source-free curl equations and the divergence constraints hold for a transverse plane-wave mode with real nonzero k. At equality the only magnitude is zero, outside [F1].

4.1step 3.1F2F4algebra∎

For 0<ω<ωp, let α=με∞(ωp2−ω2)>0 by [F4] and set κ=iα. Choose k=κz^, e=x^, b=(κ/ω)y^, and h=b/μ. Then k⋅e=k⋅b=0, k×e=ωb, and k×h=−κ2e/(μω)=α2e/(μω)=−ωε(ω)e, using ε(ω)=−ε∞(ωp2−ω2)/ω2. Thus both curl equations and the divergence constraints hold for these transverse amplitudes, while eiκz=e−αz for z≥0 gives exponential attenuation. This complex-k branch is not a real-k propagating mode and does not classify interfaces, longitudinal modes, or the uniform endpoint.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources