Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spin precession and the Zeeman splitting in a uniform magnetic field: Larmor angular frequency and the conservation of one component

Physical scope

A conditional consequence of the postulates P1, P2, P4, P5, P6 and of the adopted effective magnetic-moment coupling, for a uniform static magnetic field along the third axis of a declared inertial frame: self-adjointness and factorization of the Zeeman energy operator, conservation of the spin component along the field, and Larmor precession of the transverse spin expectations with angular frequency gamma_s B_z. The item concerns the declared model only; it excludes inhomogeneous and time-dependent fields, radiation and relaxation, asserts no measured precession frequency or gyromagnetic ratio, and identifies no apparatus.

Statement

Adopt the state and composition postulate P1, the observable and probability postulate P2, the autonomous-dynamics postulate P4, the kinematics and massive-particle model postulate P5 and the internal-factor assignment of the spin postulate P6, read for the massive spin-s model of The massive spin-s particle model of the framework: state space, operators, units and frame readings with mass parameter m>0 and spin label s, together with the effective magnetic-moment coupling adopted in Effective magnetic-moment coupling of the finite-spin model: gyromagnetic parameter, magnetic moment and Zeeman energy operator and the angular momentum readings of Orbital, spin and total angular momentum of the massive spin-s model: assigned sharp observables, units and readings, and assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix a real constant Bz∈R and use the uniform static field profile B(x):=(0,0,Bz), so that the Zeeman energy operator of the postulate is HZ=H0−γsBzS3,H0=12m∑k=13Pk2,D(HZ)=W2,2(R3;Cr), with flow UZ(t)=e−itHZ/ℏ, and put ω:=γsBz with unit s−1. For a unit vector ψ∈Hs put ψ(t):=UZ(t)ψ and ⟨Si⟩(t):=⟨Siψ(t),ψ(t)⟩. Then:

(a) HZ is self-adjoint on D(HZ) and UZ(t)=e−itH0/ℏ eitγsBzS3/ℏ(t∈R), so in particular the transverse means satisfy, for every t, ⟨S1⟩(t)=cos⁡(ωt)⟨S1⟩(0)+sin⁡(ωt)⟨S2⟩(0),⟨S2⟩(t)=cos⁡(ωt)⟨S2⟩(0)−sin⁡(ωt)⟨S1⟩(0), and the transverse vector (⟨S1⟩(t),⟨S2⟩(t)) is the rotation of (⟨S1⟩(0),⟨S2⟩(0)) by the angle −ωt in the (1,2)-plane;

(b) the component along the field is conserved: S3UZ(t)=UZ(t)S3 and ⟨S3⟩(t)=⟨S3⟩(0) for every unit ψ and every t; more generally the outcome law of S3 is time-independent in every preparation;

(c) the conjugation identities eitHZ/ℏS1e−itHZ/ℏ=cos⁡(ωt)S1+sin⁡(ωt)S2,eitHZ/ℏS2e−itHZ/ℏ=cos⁡(ωt)S2−sin⁡(ωt)S1 hold as bounded operator identities, and with S2=ℏ2s(s+1)I (the Casimir operator of the model) also S2UZ(t)=UZ(t)S2;

(d) Scope. The statement is conditional on P1, P2, P4, P5, P6 and the adopted coupling; it concerns the uniform static field B=(0,0,Bz) with Bz∈R and the declared isolated model. It excludes inhomogeneous and time-dependent fields, spin-dependent spatial potentials, radiation, relaxation and environment coupling, asserts no measured precession frequency and no measured gyromagnetic parameter, and identifies no apparatus: ω=γsBz is a model quantity computed from assigned model parameters.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The postulates P1, P2, P4, P5 and P6 and the magnetic-moment postulate in the stated readings; the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Countable Choice; the model parameters m>0, s, r=2s+1 and γs∈R; the field constant Bz∈R; the operators H0, HZ, Si, S2; a unit vector ψ; real t,θ.

[F1]

Free operator and componentwise structure. H0 is self-adjoint on D(H0)=W2,2(R3;Cr) with flow e−itH0/ℏ; its terms Pk act componentwise and commute with every fibrewise matrix action, which preserves W2,2 (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators clause (b) applied componentwise, Componentwise position and momentum operators on the component-valued wave-function space clause (a), Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution clause (b)).

[F2]

Magnetic-moment postulate. With γs∈R and a real bounded measurable profile B, the Zeeman operator HZ=H0−γs∑iSiBi(Q) with domain D(H0) is a bounded self-adjoint perturbation of H0, of unit joule, and t↦e−itHZ/ℏ is its strongly continuous unitary group in the reading of P4 (Effective magnetic-moment coupling of the finite-spin model: gyromagnetic parameter, magnetic moment and Zeeman energy operator clauses (i),(ii), Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework, The state space of the framework: preparations, pure rays and density operators).

[F3]

Product flow. If a bounded self-adjoint B commutes with the flow eiuA of a self-adjoint A, then A+B with domain D(A) is self-adjoint and e−it(A+B)/ℏ=e−itA/ℏe−itB/ℏ for all t (Self-adjointness and the flow of a self-adjoint operator perturbed by a bounded operator commuting with its flow clauses (a),(c)).

[F4]

Spin algebra and the ladder conjugation. On the internal factor, [S3,S±]=±ℏS± for S±=S1±iS2, S1=12(S++S−), S2=12i(S+−S−) and S2=ℏ2s(s+1)I; for the bounded exponential, eiθS3/ℏS±e−iθS3/ℏ=e±iθS± (Finite spin matrices clauses (a),(b),(c), The exponential series of a bounded operator, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[F5]

Conserved law from commutation. If a bounded self-adjoint S satisfies SK⊆KS for a self-adjoint K, then Se−itK/ℏ=e−itK/ℏS for all t (Conserved spectral probability laws for commuting observables and stationary eigenrays clause (a')); and if an assigned sharp observable A satisfies e−isA/ℏU(t)=U(t)e−isA/ℏ for all s,t, then its outcome law is time-independent in every preparation, with conserved mean and second moment on D(A) (Conservation of a symmetry generator: commuting flows, energy compatibility and conserved outcome laws clauses (a),(b), Mean, second moment and variance of the scalar spectral law, Density operators and scalar spectral probability, Trace class operator, The state space: density operators, pure and mixed states, and purity).

Proof

Proof technique: direct; write the Zeeman operator as a bounded perturbation commuting with the free flow, factor its evolution, conjugate the spin components by the resulting internal rotation, and read conservation of the field component from the commutation criterion.

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]-[F5].

1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

[Self-adjointness and factorization] The perturbation B0:=−γsBzS3 is bounded self-adjoint by [F4]; by [F1] it commutes with every element of the free flow e−itH0/ℏ because it is a fibrewise matrix action commuting with the componentwise free operator; hence [F3] applies with A:=H0 and B:=B0, so HZ=H0+B0 is self-adjoint on D(H0) and e−itHZ/ℏ=e−itH0/ℏeitγsBzS3/ℏ for every t.

1.2F4algebra

[Conjugation of the transverse components] By [F4] the map θ↦g(θ):=eiθS3/ℏS+e−iθS3/ℏ satisfies g′(θ)=eiθS3/ℏ(i/ℏ)[S3,S+]e−iθS3/ℏ=ig(θ) by the derivative formula of the bounded exponential, so g(θ)=eiθS+; conjugating S− gives e−iθS−; taking real and imaginary parts via [F4] yields eiθS3/ℏS1e−iθS3/ℏ=cos⁡θ S1−sin⁡θ S2 and eiθS3/ℏS2e−iθS3/ℏ=sin⁡θ S1+cos⁡θ S2.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1algebra

[Transverse means] By step 1.1, UZ(t)∗=e−itγsBzS3/ℏeitH0/ℏ, so using the commutation of S1,S2 with H0 from [F1], UZ(t)∗S1UZ(t)=e−iωtS3/ℏS1eiωtS3/ℏ=cos⁡(ωt)S1+sin⁡(ωt)S2 and UZ(t)∗S2UZ(t)=cos⁡(ωt)S2−sin⁡(ωt)S1 by step 1.2 with θ=−ωt; taking expectations in the unit vector ψ gives the two displayed mean identities, and the pair transformation is the rotation by −ωt; this is (a) and the conjugation identities of (c).

2.2step 1.1F4F5algebra

[Conservation of the field component] By [F4] the bounded self-adjoint S3 commutes with H0 and with itself, hence S3HZ⊆HZS3 on D(HZ); [F5] gives S3UZ(t)=UZ(t)S3 for every t, so ⟨S3⟩(t)=⟨S3⟩(0) for every unit ψ, and applying the second part of [F5] to the assigned sharp observable (S3,J s) of Orbital, spin and total angular momentum of the massive spin-s model: assigned sharp observables, units and readings clause (c) gives the time-independence of the law of S3 in every preparation; moreover S2 is a scalar operator by [F4] and commutes with UZ(t). This is (b) and the Casimir statement of (c).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2F2∎

[Assembly and scope] Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (a) and the conjugation identities of (c), and step 2.2 proves (b) and the Casimir commutation of (c); only the uniform static profile, the componentwise free operator and the internal matrices were used, no inhomogeneous or time-dependent field, radiation, relaxation, apparatus or empirical input entered, which is the scope statement (d).

Remarks

  • Sign and naming of the angular frequency. The model's precession angular frequency is ω=γsBz, a signed quantity; the transverse vector rotates by −ωt. Physical conventions differing by the sign of γs or by the orientation of the field axis differ by the sign of ω and by the sense of the rotation, not by the content of the theorem.
  • Energy eigenvalues of the internal factor. Combining this theorem with the spin spectrum page, the internal factor of the uniform-field model has the energy offsets −γsBzℏm, m=−s,…,s, added to the free kinetic energy; the theorem does not assert a spectroscopic measurement or the absence of additional structure.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources