Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite bosonic and fermionic mode partition and occupation formulas

Physical scope

Declared finite lists of independent bosonic one-mode Fock systems or fermionic two-level occupation systems at assigned positive temperature; no interacting, infinite-mode, continuum, condensation, measured-occupation, or thermalization conclusion is asserted.

Statement

Assume AC and Countable Choice and adopt the quantum Gibbs preparation of The canonical equilibrium-ensemble assumption: the Gibbs preparation of a declared model at assigned temperature at assigned temperature T>0 kelvins, with β=(kBT)−1 in J−1. A finite independent mode list means an integer m≥1 and, for each r∈{1,…,m}, a declared type B or F and an excitation energy εr>0 joules. For type B take the one-mode Fock Hilbert space with complete number basis (en)n∈N0 and self-adjoint occupation operator Nren=nen on its exact diagonal domain as in Single-mode thermal trace. For type F take Hr=C2 with orthonormal basis f0,f1 and Nrfn=nfn. In either case put Hr=εrNr, and write ur,n=en or fn according to the factor type. Define H(1)=H1 and recursively H(r+1)=H(r)⊗^Hr+1 by the completed Hilbert tensor construction of Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases; let H=H(m). The canonical orthonormal product basis is un=⨂rur,nr, indexed by n=(n1,…,nm)∈C:=∏rCr, where Cr=N0 for type B and Cr={0,1} for type F. If all factors are F then C is finite; otherwise it is countably infinite and is enumerated by increasing ∑rnr and lexicographic order within each finite level, which is finite because every nr≤∑rnr. For each factor put ε^r=εr/(1 J). Define the numerical energy map E^:C→R by E^(n)=∑r=1mε^rnr and the physical energy E(n)=(1 J)E^(n). Define the numerical self-adjoint diagonal operator H^ by H^un=E^(n)un on the exact domain D(H^)={ψ∈H:∑n∈CE^(n)2∣⟨ψ,un⟩∣2<∞}; when C is finite, H^ is a finite real diagonal endomorphism and is self-adjoint; when C is countably infinite, the diagonal-operator lemma Diagonal adjoint and graph-core lemma gives H^ self-adjoint for the displayed enumeration. The physical total energy operator is H=(1 J)H^, with Hun=E(n)un and D(H)=D(H^); multiplication by a nonzero real scalar preserves self-adjointness. This sum-energy Hamiltonian with no interaction term is the definition of independence for this quantum model.

Assign each factor readout (Nr,1) and the composite readout (Nr,1) as sharp observables in the sense of clause (c) of The canonical equilibrium-ensemble assumption: the Gibbs preparation of a declared model at assigned temperature, with dimensionless particle-count unit. On H define Nrψ=∑n∈Cnr⟨ψ,un⟩un,D(Nr)={ψ:∑n∈Cnr2∣⟨ψ,un⟩∣2<∞}. To specify the joint occupation readout using a single sharp observable, let j(n) be the zero-based position of n in the enumeration above (the same ordering on the finite set in the all-F case). Define Jψ=∑nj(n)⟨ψ,un⟩un on D(J)={ψ:∑nj(n)2∣⟨ψ,un⟩∣2<∞}. Assign (J,1) as the dimensionless label readout, decoding j(n) as n. These diagonal operators are self-adjoint by the same diagonal lemma (or finite diagonal matrices). Their spectral projections act by retaining the coordinates with nr∈B or j(n)∈B, respectively, for a Borel set B⊆R. Thus the decoded joint projections are Q(A)ψ=∑n∈A⟨ψ,un⟩un for A⊆C; these sums converge in H, and countable additivity holds in the strong operator topology by square-summable coordinate tails. The adopted outcome law is tr⁡(ρβQ(A)), whose rth marginal is the outcome law of Nr.

For one bosonic mode with excitation energy ε>0 joules, let q=e−βε and let N be its dimensionless occupation number. Its partition trace and mean occupation are ZB=(1−q)−1,⟨N⟩B=q1−q=1eβε−1. For a fermionic two-level occupation system with energies 0,ε, the partition sum and excited-state occupation are ZF=1+q,⟨N⟩F=q1+q=1eβε+1. For a finite independent collection as defined above, write Kβ=e−βH and Z=Tr⁡Kβ. Then 0<Z<∞ and the joint occupation-basis law is Pβ(n):=e−βE(n)/Z. For each factor r, define its marginal law by Pβ,r(k):=∑n∈C: nr=kPβ(n). The trace satisfies Z=∏r=1mZr, the joint law factorizes as Pβ(n)=∏r=1m(qrnr/Zr), and each marginal mean is the corresponding one-mode mean displayed above. These are exact model identities under the adopted preparation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite independent mode models, positive mode energies, assigned T>0, and the adopted Gibbs preparation.

[F1]

The canonical equilibrium-ensemble assumption: the Gibbs preparation of a declared model at assigned temperature clauses (a)(ii), (b), (c): use the declared number-variable mode model with G=H. For a bounded positive operator its extended trace is the basis sum; finiteness makes its square root Hilbert-Schmidt, hence the operator trace class with the same ordinary trace. Under AC and Countable Choice the model assigns ρβ=e−βH/Z and the outcome law tr⁡(ρβEA(B)) to each declared sharp observable (A,uA); its thermal mean is the spectral first moment when absolutely integrable.

[F2]

Single-mode thermal trace (current carrier status says published): for ω>0 and β>0, the one-mode bosonic trace is (1−e−βω)−1 and the number mean is 1/(eβω−1). The full proof was inspected; its published carrier lacks the required audit marker, so this use remains escalated.

[F3]

Closed formulas for the two-level canonical weights, mean energy, entropy and free energy (current carrier status says published): for energies 0,ε with ε,β>0, Z=1+e−βε and the upper-level probability is 1/(eβε+1). Its full proof was inspected; the published carrier lacks the required audit marker, so this use remains escalated.

[F4]

Thermal occupation means of the declared free-mode models: Bose and Fermi factors, product convergence and dilute remainders (current carrier status says published): the single-mode occupation readings are the stated Bose and Fermi means, under the postulate and assigned observable rules. Its full proof was inspected; the published carrier lacks the required audit marker, so this use remains escalated.

[F5]

Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases: the finite Hilbert tensor product has the complete orthonormal product basis used in the Statement. Diagonal adjoint and graph-core lemma: a real diagonal energy list defines a self-adjoint operator on the squared-weight domain displayed in the Statement.

[F6]

SI quantities and unit conventions and Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework: ε is in joules, T in kelvins, β in J−1, and the occupation number is dimensionless.

[F7]

Countable canonical model defines a nonnegative countable sum as the supremum of finite subsums; for the explicit product-basis enumeration in the Statement, the increasing finite boxes CN exhaust that supremum.

[A1]

Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice are assumed because the cited one-mode and mode-occupation supplier statements explicitly assume them.

Proof

Given: The mode energies, the independent finite mode list, T>0, and the quantum canonical preparation.

1.1F1F2F4F6A1algebra

For one bosonic mode, [F2] gives ZB=(1−q)−1 and ⟨N⟩B=q/(1−q); for q=e−βε, multiplication of numerator and denominator by eβε gives q/(1−q)=1/(eβε−1). The unit convention in [F6] makes the exponent dimensionless.

1.2F1F3F4F6A1algebra

For one fermionic occupation, [F3] gives ZF=1+q and upper-level probability q/(1+q); multiplying numerator and denominator by eβε gives q/(1+q)=1/(eβε+1).

2.1F1F2F3F5F7step 1.1step 1.2algebra

For the finite product model of the Statement, the diagonal Gibbs operator satisfies Kβun=e−βE(n)un=∏r=1mqrnrun, where qr=e−βεr. For N≥1 let Cr,N={0,…,N} for a bosonic factor and Cr,N={0,1} for a fermionic factor, and put CN=∏rCr,N. These are finite increasing sets whose union is C. Finite distributivity gives ∑n∈CN∏rqrnr=∏r∑nr∈Cr,Nqrnr. By the positive-basis trace convention in [F1] and the nonnegative-sum convention [F7], the full trace is the supremum of its finite subsums; every finite subset of C is contained in some CN. Hence 0<Z=Tr⁡Kβ=lim⁡N→∞∑n∈CN∏rqrnr=∏r=1mZr<∞, where Zr=ZB or ZF from steps 1.1–1.2. Clause (b) of [F1] now makes Kβ trace class and licenses ρβ=Kβ/Z. The assigned label readout has singleton projection Q({n})ψ=⟨ψ,un⟩un, so clause (c) gives P(n)=tr⁡(ρβQ({n}))=e−βE(n)/Z=∏r(qrnr/Zr). For fixed factor s and occupation k∈Cs, summing over the other labels in CN with ns=k gives (qsk/Z)∏r≠s∑nr∈Cr,Nqrnr once N≥k; taking N→∞ and using Z=∏rZr yields the marginal Ps(k)=qsk/Zs. The marginal is the law of the assigned Ns, and its absolute first moment is finite by the bosonic first-moment sum in [F2] or the finite two-level sum in [F3]. Thus its thermal mean is the corresponding one-mode mean in steps 1.1–1.2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the one-mode factors, and step 2.1 proves trace factorization and all marginal means for the declared finite product model. These are conditional model calculations under the adopted Gibbs preparation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources