Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact OU velocity response, diffusion and Gaussian scaling

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice and the Brownian probability-space hypotheses in Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation. Let γ,m,Θ,kB>0, σ>0, and σ2=2γkBΘ/m. Here these are real mathematical parameters; a separate physics postulate assigns their physical units and interpretation. Let V0:Ω→R be F0-measurable, satisfy V0∼N(0,kBΘ/m) and be independent of future Brownian increments. For any locally continuous deterministic input u:[0,∞)→R, and every finite tf>0, the equation restricted to [0,tf] Vt=V0−γ∫0tVs ds+1m∫0tu(s) ds+σBt,0≤t≤tf, has a unique continuous solution; these unique finite-horizon solutions agree on overlapping intervals and define one solution for all t≥0. Its mean is EVt=1m∫0te−γ(t−s)u(s) ds. For u=0, V is a stationary centered Gaussian process on [0,∞) with covariance E[VsVt]=vΘe−γ∣t−s∣,vΘ:=kBΘ/m. Define Yt:=∫0tVs ds and D:=vΘ/γ. Then Var⁡(Yt)=2vΘ(tγ−1−e−γtγ2),lim⁡t→∞Var⁡(Yt)2t=D. For every deterministic input, the centered displacement Yt−EYt is Gaussian with the variance above; consequently (Yt−EYt)/t converges in distribution to N(0,2D). For constant input u(s)=u0, lim⁡t→∞E[Vt]/u0=χ:=1/(mγ) when u0≠0, and D=χkBΘ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the OU integral equation definition, the published OU solution theorem, positive scalar parameters, and an F0-measurable stationary Gaussian initial state independent of future Brownian increments.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation: an OU solution is a continuous adapted process satisfying the stated integral equation with an F0-measurable initial variable and Brownian increments independent of the present filtration.

[F2]

Ornstein–Uhlenbeck equation, transition law, and fluctuations: under Choice and its Brownian and initial-data hypotheses, the OU solution exists uniquely; a centered Gaussian initial law with variance V=σ2/(2γ) gives a stationary Gaussian process with covariance Ve−γ∣τ∣.

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F2], m,γ,Θ,kB>0, σ2=2γkBΘ/m, and an F0-measurable real random variable V0∼N(0,kBΘ/m) independent of future Brownian increments.

1.1A1F1F2constructalgebra

Let V0 be the unforced OU solution from [F2], satisfying the integral equation in [F1]. Define the deterministic function g(t):=1m∫0te−γ(t−s)u(s) ds. Differentiation under this finite integral gives g(0)=0 and g′(t)=−γg(t)+u(t)/m, hence g(t)=−γ∫0tg(s) ds+1m∫0tu(s) ds. Adding this identity to the unforced equation shows that the continuous adapted process Vt:=Vt0+g(t) satisfies Vt=V0−γ∫0tVs ds+1m∫0tu(s) ds+σBt, the forced equation in the Statement. If two forced solutions have the same initial state and Brownian path, their difference z satisfies z(t)=−γ∫0tz(s) ds; with H(t)=∫0t∣z(s)∣ ds, one has H′(t)≤γH(t) and H(0)=0. Thus (e−γtH(t))′≤0, so H=0 and z=0. Uniqueness makes the finite-horizon solutions agree on overlaps; gluing along integer horizons gives the solution for all t≥0 on a common probability-one event.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Since V0 is centered and g is deterministic, EVt=g(t), giving the claimed mean. The parameter relation gives σ2/(2γ)=kBΘ/m=vΘ, so [F2] gives stationarity, Gaussianity and the displayed covariance for the unforced solution.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

For a uniform partition of [0,t], the Riemann sums Sn=(t/n)∑j=0n−1Vjt/n converge almost surely to Yt because V has continuous paths. Each Sn is centered Gaussian under u=0. By the covariance in step 2.1, its variance is a Riemann sum converging to ∫0t∫0tvΘe−γ∣s−r∣ ds dr=2vΘ∫0t(t−a)e−γa da=2vΘ(tγ−1−e−γtγ2). Hence the Gaussian characteristic functions of Sn converge to that of the centered normal with this variance. For each real ξ, almost-sure convergence and ∣eiξSn∣=1 let bounded convergence give EeiξSn→EeiξYt. Therefore Yt has the stated Gaussian law and variance. Adding the deterministic g to velocity changes only the mean of its integral, not this variance.

4.1step 3.1step 1.1algebra∎

Dividing the variance formula in step 3.1 by 2t and letting t→∞ gives D=vΘ/γ. The centered displacement has Gaussian variance 2Dt−2vΘ(1−e−γt)/γ2; after division by t this tends to 2D, proving the distributional limit. For constant u0, step 1.1 gives EVt=u0(1−e−γt)/(mγ), so χ=1/(mγ) and D=(kBΘ/m)/γ=χkBΘ.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources