How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact OU velocity response, diffusion and Gaussian scaling
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice and the Brownian probability-space hypotheses in Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation. Let , , and . Here these are real mathematical parameters; a separate physics postulate assigns their physical units and interpretation. Let be -measurable, satisfy and be independent of future Brownian increments. For any locally continuous deterministic input , and every finite , the equation restricted to has a unique continuous solution; these unique finite-horizon solutions agree on overlapping intervals and define one solution for all . Its mean is For , is a stationary centered Gaussian process on with covariance Define and . Then For every deterministic input, the centered displacement is Gaussian with the variance above; consequently converges in distribution to . For constant input , when , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the OU integral equation definition, the published OU solution theorem, positive scalar parameters, and an -measurable stationary Gaussian initial state independent of future Brownian increments.
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.
Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation: an OU solution is a continuous adapted process satisfying the stated integral equation with an -measurable initial variable and Brownian increments independent of the present filtration.
Ornstein–Uhlenbeck equation, transition law, and fluctuations: under Choice and its Brownian and initial-data hypotheses, the OU solution exists uniquely; a centered Gaussian initial law with variance gives a stationary Gaussian process with covariance .
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F2], , , and an -measurable real random variable independent of future Brownian increments.
Let be the unforced OU solution from [F2], satisfying the integral equation in [F1]. Define the deterministic function . Differentiation under this finite integral gives and , hence . Adding this identity to the unforced equation shows that the continuous adapted process satisfies , the forced equation in the Statement. If two forced solutions have the same initial state and Brownian path, their difference satisfies ; with , one has and . Thus , so and . Uniqueness makes the finite-horizon solutions agree on overlaps; gluing along integer horizons gives the solution for all on a common probability-one event.
Since is centered and is deterministic, , giving the claimed mean. The parameter relation gives , so [F2] gives stationarity, Gaussianity and the displayed covariance for the unforced solution.
For a uniform partition of , the Riemann sums converge almost surely to because has continuous paths. Each is centered Gaussian under . By the covariance in step 2.1, its variance is a Riemann sum converging to . Hence the Gaussian characteristic functions of converge to that of the centered normal with this variance. For each real , almost-sure convergence and let bounded convergence give . Therefore has the stated Gaussian law and variance. Adding the deterministic to velocity changes only the mean of its integral, not this variance.
Dividing the variance formula in step 3.1 by and letting gives . The centered displacement has Gaussian variance ; after division by this tends to , proving the distributional limit. For constant , step 1.1 gives , so and .