Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ornstein–Uhlenbeck equation, transition law, and fluctuations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice. Assume the filtered probability space, Brownian increment hypothesis, and initial data of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation, including EX02<∞ and future increments independent of F0. For γ,σ>0, on every finite time interval the process Xt=e−γtX0+σe−γt∫0teγs dBs has a continuous adapted version, solves the stated Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation, and is the unique continuous solution driven by the same (X0,B). Put V=σ2/(2γ). For 0≤s<t, its transition law conditional on Fs is normal with mean e−γ(t−s)Xs and variance V(1−e−2γ(t−s)). Consequently EXt=e−γtEX0,Var⁡(Xt)=e−2γtVar⁡(X0)+V(1−e−2γt). From any such initial law, Xt converges in distribution to N(0,V). If X0∼N(0,V) and is independent of future Brownian increments, the process is stationary Gaussian with covariance C(τ)=Ve−γ∣τ∣, and its transition kernel satisfies detailed balance with the N(0,V) density. Its transition density solves the Fokker–Planck equation for positive time. Under the convention S(ω)=(2π)−1∫RC(τ)eiωτ dτ, the stationary spectrum and time-average bound are S(ω)=Vγπ(γ2+ω2),Var⁡ ⁣(1T∫0TXt dt)≤2VγT. All these statements concern the specified linear stochastic model. An Einstein relation between σ and a physical bath temperature would be an additional physical postulate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the exact Brownian filtration hypothesis, and the OU equation definition.

[A1]

B is adapted and each increment Bt−Bs is independent of Fs with law N(0,t−s); X0 is F0-measurable, has finite second moment, and is independent of future Brownian increments.

[A2]

γ>0, σ>0, and time is restricted to an arbitrary finite interval [0,T].

[F1]

Ornstein–Uhlenbeck integral equation: a solution is a continuous adapted process satisfying Xt=X0−γ∫0tXsds+σBt almost surely for every t∈[0,T] on each finite interval [0,T], with T>0.

[F2]

Brownian motion, Existence of continuous Brownian motion, and Elementary predictable Brownian integrands: under the assumed Axiom of Choice, Brownian paths have a common continuous version and deterministic continuous square-integrable integrands satisfy the standing predictable Brownian hypotheses on finite intervals.

[F3]

Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes and Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2: under the assumed Axiom of Choice, the stochastic integral is defined for the deterministic square-integrable integrand and isometry computes its second moments.

[F4]

The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version and Deterministic Ito integrals are Gaussian: under the assumed Axiom of Choice, the integral process has a continuous version, and deterministic-integrand integrals are centered Gaussian with variance equal to the squared-integrand integral.

[F5]

The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡ and Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: the ordinary exponential derivative and finite continuous-integral Fubini identity hold.

[F7]

The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π: the centered Gaussian density with variance v>0 is normalized after the linear change of variable from the unit Gaussian.

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, [A1]–[A2], and [F1]–[F7].

1.1A1A2F2F3F4F5

On [0,T], g(s)=eγs is deterministic, continuous, and square-integrable. Thus Wt=∫0tg(s) dBs is defined by [F3], and [F4] supplies a continuous version. For a partition 0=t0<⋯<tn=t, the deterministic step sums ∑kg(tk)(Btk+1−Btk) converge in L2 to Wt by the Itô isometry and uniform approximation of g. Discrete summation by parts rewrites them as g(t)Bt−g(0)B0−∑k=0n−1Btk+1(g(tk+1)−g(tk)) up to an endpoint term tending to zero. Brownian path continuity makes the last sums converge pathwise to ∫0tg′(s)Bsds. The L2 limit and this almost-sure limit agree in probability, so Wt=eγtBt−γ∫0teγsBs ds almost surely for each fixed t. Both sides have continuous versions; equality on rational t holds on one probability-one event and therefore extends to all t∈[0,T].

1.2A1A2F3F4

Split the stochastic integral at s and use its linearity: Xt=e−γ(t−s)Xs+σ∫ste−γ(t−u) dBu. Step-function approximants to the last deterministic-integrand integral depend only on increments after s, so [A1] makes them independent of Fs. Their L2 limit remains independent of Fs: for bounded Fs-measurable Y and bounded continuous φ, convergence in probability plus boundedness gives convergence of E[Yφ(⋅)], preserving the factorization. By [F4] the limit is centered Gaussian; [F3] computes its variance as σ2∫ste−2γ(t−u)du=V(1−e−2γ(t−s)). This proves the conditional transition law and the Markov property.

2.1A1A2F1F4F5step 1.1

Set Xt=e−γtX0+σe−γtWt. By [F4] it is continuous and adapted. Step 1.1 rewrites it as Xt=e−γtX0+σBt−σγ∫0te−γ(t−s)Bs ds. Integrating this continuous expression in t, ordinary Fubini [F5] gives ∫0tXsds=X0(1−e−γt)/γ+σ∫0tBsds−σ∫0tBu(1−e−γ(t−u)) du. Substitution into X0−γ∫0tXsds+σBt cancels the two ∫Bsds terms and leaves exactly the displayed expression for Xt. Thus [F1] holds.

2.2A1A2F3F4step 1.2

Taking expectations in the explicit solution, the stochastic integral has mean zero by [F4], giving EXt=e−γtEX0. The integral is independent of X0 and centered, so its variance adds to e−2γtVar⁡(X0); [F3] evaluates the added variance as V(1−e−2γt). The independent Gaussian term tends in law to N(0,V) because its variance tends to V and e−γtX0→0 in L2; for any bounded continuous test, restrict to a compact interval, use uniform continuity and the second-moment tail bound, then take the interval radius to infinity.

2.3A1A2F6F7step 1.2

Write r=e−γt and π(x)=(2πV)−1/2e−x2/(2V). The transition density is Kt(x,y)=[2πV(1−r2)]−1/2exp⁡ ⁣(−(y−rx)22V(1−r2)). Multiplying by π(x) gives a symmetric prefactor and exponent proportional to −[x2+y2−2rxy]/[2V(1−r2)], unchanged when x and y are exchanged. Hence π(x)Kt(x,y)=π(y)Kt(y,x), the detailed-balance identity.

2.4A2F5F7step 1.2

For t>0 let μ=e−γtx, v=V(1−e−2γt), and p(t,x,y) be the normal density with mean μ and variance v. Direct differentiation gives ∂tp=p(μ′(y−μ)v+v′2[(y−μ)2v2−1v]),μ′=−γμ,v′=σ2−2γv. Also direct y-differentiation gives γ∂y(yp)+(σ2/2)∂yyp equal to the same expression after writing y=μ+(y−μ). Thus ∂tp=γ∂y(yp)+(σ2/2)∂yyp. The Gaussian formula has total integral one and converges to point mass at x as t↓0; this is the stated positive-time Fokker–Planck solution.

3.1A2F1step 2.1algebra

If X and X~ are two continuous solutions with the same data, their difference z satisfies z(t)=−γ∫0tz(s)ds. Let D(t)=∫0t∣z(s)∣ds. Then D(0)=0, D≥0, and D′(t)=∣z(t)∣≤γD(t) by the equation. The derivative of e−γtD(t) is nonpositive, so this nonnegative function is at most its initial value zero. Hence D=0 and continuity gives z=0 at every time.

3.2A1A2F4step 1.2step 2.2

If X0 is centered normal with variance V, step 1.2 gives centered Gaussian finite-dimensional laws, since each stochastic integral over a disjoint increment interval is an independent Gaussian and X0 is independent of future increments. Its one-time variance is V. For s≤t, the split formula in 2.1 and independence of the later increment yield E[XsXt]=e−γ(t−s)E[Xs2]=Ve−γ(t−s). Thus covariance depends only on ∣t−s∣. A centered Gaussian finite-dimensional law is determined by its covariance matrix; shifting every time by the same amount preserves that matrix and proves stationarity.

4.1A2F6step 3.2

For R>0, the derivative and componentwise FTC in [F6] give ∫0Re−(γ−iω)tdt=(1−e−(γ−iω)R)/(γ−iω). The modulus formula gives ∣e−(γ−iω)R∣=e−γR→0 and ∣e−(γ−iω)t∣=e−γt, whose integral is finite. Thus the stationary covariance is integrable. By evenness, S(ω)=VπRe⁡∫0∞e−(γ−iω)tdt=VπRe⁡1γ−iω=Vγπ(γ2+ω2). The integral converges absolutely because γ>0.

5.1A1A2F5step 3.2∎

For the stationary time average, Fubini applies to the random product because E∣XsXt∣≤(EXs2EXt2)1/2=V, so its absolute integral over the finite square and probability space is at most VT2. Changing variables in the two triangular halves gives Var⁡ ⁣(T−1∫0TXtdt)=2VT2∫0T(T−s)e−γsds≤2VγT. The bound tends to zero, so these averages converge to zero in L2 and in probability. It asserts no almost-sure theorem for arbitrary observables.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources