Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conditional sampled and continuous-time averages

Statement

Let (M,ω,H,Φ,m0) be a Hamiltonian phase datum and let R be a complete invariant Borel domain carrying a Borel probability μ such that μ(Φs−1B)=μ(B) for every s∈R and every Borel B⊆R. Fix a sampling interval Δ>0 and define the time map T=ΦΔ∣R. Assume this particular map is ergodic for μ, meaning that every Borel E⊆R with T−1E=E has μ(E)∈{0,1}. For every real f∈L1(μ), the sampled averages 1N∑j=0N−1f(Tjz) converge μ-almost surely and in L1(μ) to ∫Rf dμ. If f is additionally bounded and Borel, then the continuous-time averages 1τ∫0τf(Φsz) ds converge μ-almost surely and in L1(μ) to the same mean as τ→∞. No ergodicity of every time map or generic Hamiltonian flow is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complete invariant domain, a probability μ invariant under the Hamiltonian flow, Δ>0, ergodicity of T=ΦΔ, and the integrability or boundedness condition on f in the relevant clause.

[A1]

ACω is carried for the completed-product Fubini supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Hamiltonian phase, complete-domain flow and reference measure: Φt is a smooth local Hamiltonian flow with the usual flow composition law wherever defined.

[F2]

Measure-preserving transformations and systems and Ergodicity relative to an invariant measure: the selected map T preserves μ and is ergodic relative to μ; the cited convention tests strictly invariant sets, T−1E=E.

[F3]

Birkhoff's theorem for an ergodic probability system: for a real L1 observable and an ergodic probability-preserving map, its sampled averages converge almost surely and in L1 to the space mean. The actual supplier statement permits noninvertible maps.

[F4]

Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability: for the completed product of time Lebesgue measure and μ, the bounded jointly measurable integrand may be integrated in either order.

[F5]

Dominated convergence: a uniformly bounded sequence on the probability space that converges almost everywhere also converges in L1.

[F6]

Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps: flow invariance of μ preserves the integral of an integrable observable under each Φs.

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F6], and the hypotheses in the statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3given

The map T=ΦΔ∣R is a measurable self-map preserving μ, and it is ergodic by hypothesis. Apply [F3] to the real observable f∈L1(μ). This proves the sampled almost-sure and L1 convergence to ∫Rf dμ.

1.2A1F4F6given

Now assume f is bounded and Borel. Joint measurability of the flow makes (s,z)↦f(Φsz) measurable. Define g(z)=Δ−1∫0Δf(Φsz) ds. By [F4], g is measurable; ∣g∣≤∥f∥∞; and by [F6] and Fubini, ∫Rg dμ=Δ−1∫0Δ∫Rf(Φsz) dμ(z) ds=∫Rf dμ.

2.1F1F3F5step 1.2

The discrete average of g is exactly N−1∑j<Ng(ΦjΔz)=(NΔ)−1∫0NΔf(Φsz) ds, by the flow composition law and the partition of the time interval into N blocks of length Δ. Applying the almost-sure part of [F3] to bounded g gives convergence of these block averages to ∫Rf dμ. Since they are bounded by ∥f∥∞, [F5] also gives L1 convergence along τ=NΔ.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

For arbitrary τ=NΔ+r with 0≤r<Δ, let Is(z)=∫0sf(Φuz) du. Then ∣Iτ−INΔ∣≤r∥f∥∞ and ∣INΔ∣≤NΔ∥f∥∞. Hence ∣Iττ−INΔNΔ∣≤2Δ∥f∥∞τ. This deterministic bound tends to zero uniformly in z, so the almost-sure and L1 limits in step 2.1 hold for all real τ→∞.

Remarks

The hypothesis is about the chosen sampled map ΦΔ. A continuous flow may be ergodic while a resonant sampled time map is not, so the theorem does not replace the explicit ergodicity assumption.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources