Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conformal Einstein tensor transformation

Statement

Let (M,g,N,o) be the smooth oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold of Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions, with the curvature convention and tensors of The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors. Let Ω:M→(0,∞) be smooth and dimensionless, and put g~=Ω2g with the same orientation. Use the metric-selected connection and its tensor derivative of Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class and Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields. Define the smooth one-form and its contractions by

u:=Ω−1dΩ,Hab:=(∇au)b,θ:=gabHab,s:=gabuaub.

Then Hab=Hba and

Ric⁡~ab=Ric⁡ab−2Hab−gabθ+2uaub−2gabs,

S~=Ω−2(S−6θ−6s),

G~ab=Gab−2Hab+2uaub+2gabθ+gabs.

All curvature conventions are those stated in The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors. These are mathematical transformation identities, not an assertion that the Einstein equation is conformally invariant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, smooth positive Ω, and the metric-selected connections of g and g~. The inherited geometric setup carries ACω as in [A1].

[F1]

The geometry is smooth, oriented and time-oriented, with nondegenerate Lorentz metric of signature (−,+,+,+); its smooth real forms and metric volume form have the definitions of Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions.

[F2]

Curvature is R(X,Y)Z=∇X∇YZ−∇Y∇XZ−∇[X,Y]Z, with Rabcd, Ric⁡bd=gacRabcd, S=gbdRic⁡bd, and Gab=Ric⁡ab−12Sgab. (The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors)

[F3]

For either smooth Lorentz metric h=g or h=g~, the metric-selected connection is affine and torsion-free and has Christoffel formula Γ[h]abc=12had(∂bhdc+∂chbd−∂dhbc). (Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class, Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields)

[F4]

For a type (1,2) tensor C, the tensor derivative has components (∇∂cC)adb=∂cCadb+ΓaecCedb−ΓedcCaeb−ΓebcCade; it commutes with contractions and annihilates g and g−1. (Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields)

[F5]

The exterior derivative sends a smooth k-form to a smooth (k+1)-form, has coordinate formula (dβ)a0…ak=(k+1)∂[a0βa1…ak], and obeys d2=0 and the graded product rule. (Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star)

[F6]

For x>0 and α∈R, (xα)′=αxα−1; the chain rule holds for total derivatives. (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a))

[F7]

For each finite k, finite componentwise sums and products of Ck Euclidean maps and compositions of composable Ck Euclidean maps are Ck. Applying this at every finite k in smooth manifold charts shows that finite sums, products and compositions of smooth maps are smooth. (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition)

[F8]

For either metric-selected connection, with the curvature convention of [F2], the coordinate curvature formula is Rabcd=∂cΓadb−∂dΓacb+ΓaceΓedb−ΓadeΓecb, with summation over e. (Tensoriality of the curvature, its coordinate formula and its point-normal metric formula)

[A1]

The inherited choice assumption is Countable Choice ACω, not full Choice. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

1.1givenF1F3F5F6F7A1algebra

In a chart, ∂ag~bc=Ω2(∂agbc+2uagbc) and g~ad=Ω−2gad. Substituting these into [F3] cancels the common Ω2 and gives Γ~abc−Γabc=Cabc:=δbauc+δcaub−gbcua, where ua=gabub. Iterating the derivative formula in [F6] gives Dm(r−1)=(−1)mm!r−m−1 for every integer m≥0 and r>0; all these derivatives are continuous, so r↦r−1 is smooth on (0,∞). Its composition with Ω is smooth by [F7], and dΩ is a smooth one-form by [F5], so u and the displayed components Cabc are smooth. Finally, define A(X,Y):=∇~XY−∇XY for smooth local vector fields. The affine-connection rules in [F3] give A(fX,Y)=fA(X,Y) and A(X,fY)=fA(X,Y) for every smooth function f, while its components are the smooth differences Cabc; hence A is a smooth tensor of type (1,2) with those components.

2.1F3F5step 1.1algebra

By [F5], 0=d(1)=d(Ω−1Ω)=Ω−1dΩ+Ω d(Ω−1), so d(Ω−1)=−Ω−2dΩ. Therefore du=d(Ω−1)∧dΩ+Ω−1d2Ω=−Ω−2dΩ∧dΩ=0. Torsion freedom in [F3] gives (du)ab=∇aub−∇bua, hence Hab=Hba.

2.2F2F4F8step 1.1algebra

Apply the coordinate curvature formula [F8] to g and g~ and subtract, using Γ~=Γ+C from step 1.1. Since C is a tensor, [F4] gives (∇cC)adb−(∇dC)acb=∂cCadb−∂dCacb+ΓaceCedb−ΓadeCecb+ΓedbCace−ΓecbCade; the two covariant-derivative terms acting on the lower curvature-direction slots d,c cancel because Γecd=Γedc, while the lower b-slot contributions are the last two displayed terms. These are exactly the partial-derivative and mixed ΓC terms in the subtraction, and the remaining terms are CaceCedb−CadeCecb. Therefore R~abcd−Rabcd=∇cCadb−∇dCacb+CaceCedb−CadeCecb.

3.1F2F4step 2.1step 2.2algebra

Contracting a with c as in [F2], the derivative terms are ∇aCadb−∇dCaab. The definition of C gives Caab=4ub and, using ∇g=0 from [F4], ∇aCadb=Hdb+Hbd−gdbθ=2Hbd−gdbθ by step 2.1. Thus their difference is −2Hbd−gbdθ.

4.1step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra

The first quadratic contraction is CaaeCedb=4ue(δdeub+δbeud−gdbue)=8ubud−4gbds. Expanding the second contraction into its nine terms gives CadeCeab=udub+udub−gdbs+4udub+udub−udub−udub−gdbs+udub=6ubud−2gbds. Their difference is 2ubud−2gbds. Combining this with step 3.1 proves the Ricci transformation in the Statement.

5.1F2step 4.1algebra

Contracting the Ricci transformation with g~ab=Ω−2gab gives S~=Ω−2(S−2θ−4θ+2s−8s)=Ω−2(S−6θ−6s).

6.1F2step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

By definition, G~ab=Ric⁡~ab−12S~ g~ab. Substituting the Ricci formula from step 4.1 and S~ g~ab=(S−6θ−6s)gab from step 5.1 cancels the scalar-curvature terms and leaves Gab−2Hab+2uaub+2gabθ+gabs. This is the claimed Einstein-tensor formula.

Remarks

The curvature sign and Ricci contraction were taken from the inspected Lorentzian supplier The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors. The conformal identities above were derived with that convention; no Riemannian curvature formula or sign convention is imported.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources