Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First Pontryagin class of an underlying real complex bundle

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let B be a nonempty path-connected paracompact Hausdorff compactly generated weak Hausdorff space of CW homotopy type, and let E→B be a numerable complex vector bundle of finite rank. These are the extended-base hypotheses in the integral complex projective bundle theorem used to define the characteristic classes here. Write ER for its underlying real bundle. With the normalization p1(V)=−c2(V⊗RC) for a real bundle V, one has p1(ER)=c1(E)2−2c2(E)in H4(B;Z).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated bundle over B and integral Chern and Pontryagin classes with the supplier conventions.

[F1]

Pontryagin classes by complexification defines pi(V)=(−1)ic2i(V⊗RC) for a real bundle over a path-connected CW-type base; in particular p1(V)=−c2(V⊗RC).

[F2]

Complexification is conjugation invariant gives ci(E‾)=(−1)ici(E) for numerable complex bundles under AC.

[F3]

Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes gives naturality and c(E⊕F)=c(E)c(F) for numerable complex bundles over a path-connected CW base.

[A1]

Full AC is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.

[F4]

Integral complex projective bundle theorem extends the projective-bundle basis and unique monic relation to paracompact Hausdorff compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces of CW homotopy type, the exact base class imposed in the Statement. Pullback of the projective bundle and its tautological line pulls this relation back; uniqueness makes the Chern coefficients natural for the CW-model map.

[F5]

Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology states that homotopic maps induce equal pullbacks on singular cohomology. Since the map f in step 1.1 is a homotopy equivalence, its pullback f∗ is injective.

Proof

technique · Direct calculation from the defining characteristic classes
1.1A1F1F3F4F5given

If E has rank zero, then ER is the zero bundle and the zero-rank conventions in [F1] and [F3] make both sides vanish. Assume henceforth that E has positive rank. Choose a homotopy equivalence f:C→B from a nonempty path-connected CW complex. Pull the numeration of E back to f∗E. The projective-bundle relation and its tautological class pull back, so uniqueness in [F4] gives ci(f∗E)=f∗ci(E); the same argument applies to complexification and its Chern classes. Also f∗ is injective by [F5]. Thus it suffices to prove the identity on C, where [F2] and [F3] apply. Work on C for the characteristic-class calculation below.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

The complexification (ER)C has the complex-linear endomorphism induced by the complex structure J on ER. Its +i and −i eigensubbundles are respectively E and its conjugate bundle E‾: the projections (1−iJ)/2 and (1+iJ)/2 are continuous and commute with all complexified transition functions. Hence (ER)C≅E⊕E‾.

3.1F2F3step 2.1algebra

Put a=c1(E) and b=c2(E). By [F2], c1(E‾)=−a and c2(E‾)=b. By [F3] and step 2.1, the degree-four part of c(E)c(E‾) is b+a(−a)+b=2b−a2, so c2((ER)C)=2c2(E)−c1(E)2.

4.1F1F5step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Apply [F1] to ER and negate the equality in step 3.1. This gives p1(ER)=c1(E)2−2c2(E). Naturality and injectivity of f∗ from step 1.1 descend this equality to the original base B; the rank-zero case was discharged separately in step 1.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources