How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First Pontryagin class of an underlying real complex bundle
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a nonempty path-connected paracompact Hausdorff compactly generated weak Hausdorff space of CW homotopy type, and let be a numerable complex vector bundle of finite rank. These are the extended-base hypotheses in the integral complex projective bundle theorem used to define the characteristic classes here. Write for its underlying real bundle. With the normalization for a real bundle , one has
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated bundle over and integral Chern and Pontryagin classes with the supplier conventions.
Pontryagin classes by complexification defines for a real bundle over a path-connected CW-type base; in particular .
Complexification is conjugation invariant gives for numerable complex bundles under AC.
Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes gives naturality and for numerable complex bundles over a path-connected CW base.
Full AC is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.
Integral complex projective bundle theorem extends the projective-bundle basis and unique monic relation to paracompact Hausdorff compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces of CW homotopy type, the exact base class imposed in the Statement. Pullback of the projective bundle and its tautological line pulls this relation back; uniqueness makes the Chern coefficients natural for the CW-model map.
Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology states that homotopic maps induce equal pullbacks on singular cohomology. Since the map in step 1.1 is a homotopy equivalence, its pullback is injective.
Proof
If has rank zero, then is the zero bundle and the zero-rank conventions in [F1] and [F3] make both sides vanish. Assume henceforth that has positive rank. Choose a homotopy equivalence from a nonempty path-connected CW complex. Pull the numeration of back to . The projective-bundle relation and its tautological class pull back, so uniqueness in [F4] gives ; the same argument applies to complexification and its Chern classes. Also is injective by [F5]. Thus it suffices to prove the identity on , where [F2] and [F3] apply. Work on for the characteristic-class calculation below.
The complexification has the complex-linear endomorphism induced by the complex structure on . Its and eigensubbundles are respectively and its conjugate bundle : the projections and are continuous and commute with all complexified transition functions. Hence .
Put and . By [F2], and . By [F3] and step 2.1, the degree-four part of is , so .
Apply [F1] to and negate the equality in step 3.1. This gives . Naturality and injectivity of from step 1.1 descend this equality to the original base ; the rank-zero case was discharged separately in step 1.1.