Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Full-support collision equilibrium has Maxwellian form

Statement

Fix a time and let Ω=∏j=13(R/LjZ) for periods Lj>0 in metres, with the completed unnormalised pushforward dx of Lebesgue measure on ∏j[0,Lj) as in the kinetic-density definition. Choose a constant reference density fref>0 with the units of f, and let f:Ω×R3→(0,∞) be measurable in x, C2 in velocity v∈R3 measured in metres per second, and integrable in velocity for almost every x. Let Qel={(v,w,v′,w′)∈R12:v+w=v′+w′, ∣v∣2+∣w∣2=∣v′∣2+∣w′∣2} with its relative Borel sigma-algebra, and let ν be a locally finite symmetric measure on this set with full support, meaning every nonempty relatively open subset has positive ν-measure. Use the collision domain and weak-test spaces of the elastic-collision definition; for almost every x, require f(x,⋅)∈Dν, so its four collision evaluations are ν-measurable and all compactly supported smooth tests have the required absolute convergence in the weak identity. Define Dx:=14∫Qel(f(x,v)f(x,w)−f(x,v′)f(x,w′))log⁡ ⁣(f(x,v)f(x,w)f(x,v′)f(x,w′))dν, and assume Dx is measurable and integrable. If ∫ΩDx dx=0, then for almost every x there exist C(x)>0 with the units of f, U(x)∈R3 measured in metres per second, and θ(x)>0 measured in squared metres per second squared, such that f(x,v)=C(x)exp⁡ ⁣(−∣v−U(x)∣22θ(x))for every v∈R3. For almost every such x, the collision operator annihilates this profile in the weak sense that ∫R3φ(v)Qν(f(x,⋅))(v) dv=0 for every φ∈Cc∞(R3;C). Conversely, every profile of this form has Dx=0; when it belongs to Dν, the same compact-test weak identity gives this annihilation conclusion. Here θ has units of squared speed. The claim characterizes zero collision production only; it does not assert that a spatially varying Maxwellian solves the transport equation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive velocity profile, a symmetric locally finite full-support collision measure, and zero total production as in the Statement.

[F1]

Elastic collision measure and weak collision operator: Elastic quadruples conserve v+w and ∣v∣2+∣w∣2; the collision bracket and symmetric measure are defined there.

[F3]

Peano's form: the normalized Taylor remainder tends to zero: For a C2 function, the second-order Taylor expansion at a point has remainder o(∣z∣2).

[F4]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): A continuously differentiable function with zero derivative along a coordinate segment is constant along that segment.

[A1]

The hypotheses in the Statement hold; in particular the production is finite and ν has full support.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

By [F2], Dx≥0 for almost every x. Since its spatial integral is zero, Dx=0 for almost every x. Fix any such x and write g(v)=log⁡(f(x,v)/fref), where fref>0 is a constant with the units of f. The integrand defining Dx is continuous and nonnegative in the collision variables. If it were positive at any elastic quadruple, it would be bounded below by a positive constant on a relatively open neighborhood; full support would make that neighborhood have positive measure, contradicting Dx=0. Therefore f(v)f(w)=f(v′)f(w′) for every elastic quadruple, equivalently g(v)+g(w)=g(v′)+g(w′).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

For arbitrary a,z∈R3 and any rotation R∈SO(3), the incoming pair (a+z,a−z) and outgoing pair (a+Rz,a−Rz) have equal total momentum 2a and equal total squared speed 2∣a∣2+2∣z∣2. The collision identity from step 1.1 gives g(a+z)+g(a−z)=g(a+Rz)+g(a−Rz). Thus for fixed a and radius ∣z∣, the left side is independent of the direction of z.

3.1A1F3step 2.1algebra

Fix a unit vector ξ and any other unit vector η. Choose a rotation taking ξ to η, put z=sξ in step 2.1, and expand each side at s=0 using [F3]. The constant and linear terms cancel in each symmetric pair. Dividing the resulting equality by s2 and taking s→0 gives ξTD2g(a)ξ=ηTD2g(a)η. Hence the quadratic form of the symmetric Hessian is constant on the unit sphere. Testing ei gives equal diagonal entries; testing (ei+ej)/2 gives zero off-diagonal entries. Therefore D2g(a)=λ(a)I.

4.1A1F4step 3.1algebra

Since the mixed second derivatives vanish, ∂ig(v) is constant along every coordinate segment in a direction ej with j≠i, by [F4]. Connecting points with the same ith coordinate by three coordinate segments shows ∂ig(v)=Gi(vi) for a differentiable one-variable function Gi. The Hessian identity in step 3.1 yields Gi′(vi)=Gj′(vj) for every pair i≠j and every independent choice of vi,vj. Fixing vj while varying vi shows Gi′ is constant; equality then makes the constants the same λ. Thus Gi(s)=λs+bi, and integrating the gradient along coordinate segments gives g(v)=α+b⋅v+λ2∣v∣2 for constants α∈R, b∈R3, and λ∈R.

5.1A1step 4.1algebra

Because f is integrable and positive on R3, λ cannot be positive: the quadratic term then makes eg(v) nonintegrable at infinity. If λ=0, an affine exponential is either constant or grows on a half-space, and is again nonintegrable. Hence λ<0. Completing the square gives g(v)=α′−∣v−U∣2/(2θ) with θ=−1/λ>0 and U=−b/λ. Exponentiating gives the asserted profile.

6.1F1step 5.1algebra∎

For the profile obtained in step 5.1, A=B on every elastic quadruple because its logarithm is a constant plus a linear and a quadratic collision invariant. The Definition's weak identity for each compactly supported smooth test therefore gives ∫φQν(f(x,⋅)) dv=0; the collision integrand also vanishes, so Dx=0. Conversely, the same calculation applies to every profile of this form, with weak annihilation conditional on its membership in Dν.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources