Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded-domain residual error with explicit channel lift

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω: every sequence (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets admits a function c with c(n)∈Xn. Let T>0, let D⊆R3 be a bounded connected C2 domain, let I be an open interval containing [0,T], and let ρ0,ν>0. Suppose u,v∈C1([0,T];C2(D‾;R3)) and p,q∈C([0,T];C1(D‾)) extend with these regularities to a neighborhood of D‾, with div⁡u=div⁡v=0. Let f∈C([0,T]×D‾;R3), and for any velocity w and scalar pressure π set

R(w,π):=∂tw+(w⋅∇)w+ρ0−1∇π−νΔw−f.

Assume R(u,p)=0, and suppose u and v have the same boundary trace on ∂D at each time. Define r=R(v,q).

Define the bilinear gradient norm

L(t)=sup⁡x∈D‾ sup⁡∣ξ∣=∣ζ∣=1∣ζ⋅Dxu(t,x)ξ∣,

where (Dxu)ij=∂xjui is the row-component Jacobian and ξ,ζ are Euclidean unit vectors. For real vector fields F,G∈L2(D;R3), use the inner product ⟨F,G⟩=∫DF(x)⋅G(x) dx and its norm ∥F∥L2(D)=(∫D∣F(x)∣2 dx)1/2. Set A(t)=∫0tL(s) ds. Then for every t∈[0,T],

∥v(t)−u(t)∥L2(D)≤eA(t)(∥v(0)−u(0)∥L2(D)+∫0te−A(s)∥r(s)∥L2(D) ds).

The same estimate holds on the flat periodic channel Dch=TLx×(0,h)×TLz, where TL=R/(LZ), when the same equations and regularity assumptions hold, norms and integrals are over one periodic cell, and u,v share the two wall traces; paired periodic-face terms cancel. In particular, let w be smooth and divergence-free with traces γ0(t,x,z)+a(t)ex at y=0 and γh(t,x,z)+b(t)ex at y=h, where γ0,γh are prescribed wall-velocity fields, while the exact solution u has traces γ0,γh. For a,b∈C1([0,T]), set

ℓ(t,x,y,z)=(a(t)(1−y/h)+b(t)y/h, 0, 0),v=w−ℓ.

The corrected residual is

rℓ=R(v,q)=R(w,q)−ℓt−(ℓ⋅∇)w−(w⋅∇)ℓ+(ℓ⋅∇)ℓ+νΔℓ.

Thus ∥w(t)−u(t)∥2≤∥ℓ(t)∥2+∥v(t)−u(t)∥2, with the preceding estimate applied to v and rℓ. This result assumes the displayed lift data and makes no general boundary-lifting claim, Prandtl-profile existence claim, or viscosity-uniform no-slip inviscid-limit claim. In SI units, [ρ0]=kg m−3, [ν]=m2 s−1, [p]=[q]=Pa, [f]=[r]=m s−2, [a]=[b]=[ℓ]=m s−1, [h]=m, L has units s−1, and A is dimensionless. Velocity, error and lift volume L2 norms have units m5/2 s−1; residual volume L2 norms have units m5/2 s−2, so their time-integrated contribution has units m5/2 s−1.

Statement references

The forced constant-density incompressible operators and full residual convention: Common-wall residual and capillary boundary model.

The bounded C1 divergence theorem used for the wall energy identity: Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain.

Bounded-domain energy estimates and their hypotheses: Temam, §3.1, printed pp. 17–18 (PDF pp. 35–36).

Periodic relative-energy computation and the separate no-slip inviscid-limit boundary-layer condition: Wiedemann, §§5.1–5.2, printed pp. 38–43.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The interval, domain, constants, fields, equations, common trace, and residual stated above. Assume ACω as in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice ACω: every sequence (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets admits a function f with f(n)∈Xn for all n (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Common-wall residual and capillary boundary model defines the full forced residual R(w,q)=wt+(w⋅∇)w+ρ0−1∇q−νΔw−f with the Cartesian operators; the theorem's residual signs match that definition.

[F2]

Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain: under ACω, for n≥2, a bounded C1 domain Ω, and F∈C1(Ω‾;Rn), ∫Ωdiv⁡F dx=∫∂ΩF⋅ν dS.

[F3]

Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation gives ∣a⋅b∣≤∣a∣∣b∣ for a,b∈R3. The scalar inequality Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2 gives ∫D∣fg∣ dx≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 for f,g∈L2(D). Consequently, applying it to the scalar magnitudes of vector fields gives ∣⟨F,G⟩∣≤∫D∣F∣∣G∣ dx≤∥F∥2∥G∥2; bounded continuous fields on this finite-volume domain have these finite norms.

[F6]

Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: if G is continuous on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable f agrees with G′ on (a,b), then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a).

[F7]

The reals are complete states that R is a complete totally ordered field. Instantiate Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0} with that field: every nonnegative real radicand has a unique nonnegative real square root, positive when the radicand is positive.

[F8]

The inner-product norm is definite, homogeneous, and satisfies the triangle inequality: the norm from an inner product satisfies ∥x+y∥≤∥x∥+∥y∥; this applies to the real vector-field L2(D;R3) inner product specified above.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and definitions in the Statement and Facts & Assumptions.

For any vector field h:D‾→R3 with first spatial derivatives, write (∇h)ij:=∂xjhi and set ∥∇h∥22:=∫D∑i,j=13∣∂xjhi(x)∣2 dx. This is the componentwise L2 norm of the row-component Jacobian, distinct from the vector-field L2 norm defined in the Statement.

1.1givenF1algebra

Put e=v−u and π=q−p. Subtracting the exact equation for u from the residual equation for v gives et+(v⋅∇)e+(e⋅∇)u+ρ0−1∇π−νΔe=r, because (v⋅∇)v−(u⋅∇)u=(v⋅∇)e+(e⋅∇)u.

1.2givenF1algebra

In the channel case, ℓ∣y=0=aex, ℓ∣y=h=bex, div⁡ℓ=0, ℓt=(a′(1−y/h)+b′y/h)ex, Δℓ=0, and (ℓ⋅∇)ℓ=0, since ℓ depends only on y in its first component and that component is affine in y. Thus v=w−ℓ is divergence-free and has the exact wall trace.

2.1givenA1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Set Y(t)=∥e(t)∥22 and R(t)=∥r(t)∥2. Pair the equation in step 1.1 with e and integrate over D. The transport integral is 12∫Ddiv⁡(v∣e∣2)=0 because div⁡v=0 and e=0 on ∂D; the pressure integral is ρ0−1∫Ddiv⁡(πe)=0 because div⁡e=0 and e=0 on ∂D; and the diffusion term is −ν∫De⋅Δe=ν∫D∣∇e∣2 because ∫Ddiv⁡(∑iei∇ei)=0. These three identities use [F2]. The bilinear gradient norm gives ∣(e⋅∇)u⋅e∣≤L(t)∣e∣2, and the pointwise Euclidean bound followed by scalar Cauchy–Schwarz in [F3] gives ∫D∣e⋅r∣≤∫D∣e∣∣r∣≤∥e∥2∥r∥2=YR. Pointwise in x, the difference quotients of ∣e(t,x)∣2 converge uniformly on D‾ to 2e⋅et as the time increment tends to zero, because e,et are continuous on the compact space-time closure; integrating preserves this uniform limit since D has finite volume. Therefore Y′=2∫De⋅et and 12Y′(t)+ν∥∇e(t)∥22≤L(t)Y(t)+R(t)Y(t).

2.2givenstep 1.2algebra

Expanding the convective term in R(w−ℓ,q) gives R(w−ℓ,q)=R(w,q)−ℓt−(ℓ⋅∇)w−(w⋅∇)ℓ+(ℓ⋅∇)ℓ+νΔℓ. For this explicit lift, (ℓ⋅∇)w=ℓ1∂xw and (w⋅∇)ℓ=w2(b−a)h−1ex, while the last two lift-only terms vanish by step 1.2.

3.1givenF4F5F6F7step 2.1algebra

For δ>0, let yδ(t)=Y(t)+δ2. The radicand is positive; the identity ∣yδ(t+h)−yδ(t)∣=∣Y(t+h)−Y(t)∣/(yδ(t+h)+yδ(t)) first gives continuity of yδ, and the same difference-of-squares identity in the difference quotient gives yδ′=Y′/(2yδ). Dropping the nonnegative diffusion term in step 2.1 and using Y/yδ≤yδ and Y/yδ≤1 yields yδ′≤Lyδ+R. The function L is continuous because D‾ is compact and Dxu is continuous; for A(t)=∫0tL(s) ds, the difference quotient is the average of L on the interval between t and t+h, so continuity gives A′=L. Thus [F4] and [F5] give (e−Ayδ)′≤e−AR. Integrate on [0,t] using [F6] and let δ↓0. This proves the stated bound for e=v−u.

4.1givenF6F8step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2∎

On the channel cell [0,Lx]×[0,h]×[0,Lz], repeat the energy calculation in step 2.1 with e=v−u and residual rℓ from step 2.2. For each of its divergence terms, integrate each coordinate derivative by the fundamental theorem [F6]: the paired x and z face values agree by periodicity, while the y=0,h contributions vanish because e=0 at both walls. Thus the transport and pressure terms vanish and the diffusion term is ν∥∇e∥22, exactly as in step 2.1; no C2 Euclidean boundary assertion about the rectangular cell is needed. The same norm regularization and integrating-factor argument in step 3.1 therefore gives the stated estimate for v=w−ℓ with residual rℓ. Since w−u=(v−u)+ℓ, [F8] gives ∥w−u∥2≤∥v−u∥2+∥ℓ∥2, which is the asserted channel estimate.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources