Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global smooth two-dimensional periodic Navier–Stokes

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let ν>0 and let u0:Q2→R2 be a smooth real divergence-free field on Q2=R2/(2πZ)2. Use normalized measure dμ=(2π)−2dx, coefficients f^(k)=∫Q2f(x)e−ik⋅x dμ(x), weights wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2, and componentwise norms ∥f∥Hm2=∑k∈Z2wk2m∣f^(k)∣2. The unique maximal smooth periodic solution supplied by the local incompressible theorem, ut+(u⋅∇)u=−∇π+νΔu,div⁡u=0,u(0)=u0, exists for all t≥0 and is unique among smooth solutions with these data. For each integer m≥4 there is a constant Cm depending only on m such that log⁡(e+∥u(t)∥Hm)≤log⁡(e+∥u0∥Hm)+Cm[t+∥ω0∥L2t(t+12ν)],ω0=∂1(u0)2−∂2(u0)1. This is a theorem for positive viscosity on the two-dimensional periodic domain; it asserts no global regularity for three-dimensional Navier–Stokes or for inviscid Euler.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, ν>0, the normalized Fourier conventions and smooth divergence-free data in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Local smooth periodic Euler and Navier–Stokes: for smooth real divergence-free data, d=2, integer s≥4, and fixed ν≥0, the normalized periodic full incompressible system has a unique local smooth solution. Its local lifespan is positive.

[F2]

Smooth vorticity identities and two-dimensional norms: on every interval of a given smooth two-dimensional solution, ω=∂1u2−∂2u1 satisfies ωt+u⋅∇ω=νΔω and 12ddt∥ω∥22=−ν∥∇ω∥22.

[F3]

Two-dimensional Fourier logarithmic velocity bound: for every smooth divergence-free field and integer m≥4, S(u)=∑k≠0∣k∣∣u^(k)∣≤Cm(1+∥ω∥H1log⁡(e+∥u∥Hm)).

[F4]

Two-dimensional transport commutator bound by the Fourier l1 gradient sum: for smooth divergence-free u on the normalized two-torus and integer m≥4, ∥[Λm,u⋅∇]u∥2≤CmS(u)∥u∥Hm, where S(u)=∑k≠0∣k∣∣u^(k)∣.

[F5]

Smooth Sobolev continuation criterion: if a maximal smooth periodic incompressible solution has finite maximal time and bounded H4 norm up to that time, it extends smoothly beyond it.

[F6]

Periodic fluid Fourier Sobolev spaces: Λm is the self-adjoint Fourier multiplier Λmf^(k)=wkmf^(k), commutes with spatial derivatives, and defines the stated Hm norm.

Proof

technique · Derive a logarithmic-in-$H^m$ differential estimate from the 2D enstrophy balance, the proved lattice bound, and the Fourier commutator estimate; then apply the local continuation criterion
1.1givenA1F1

By [F1], local smooth solutions exist and are unique for every smooth restart datum. Uniqueness makes solutions with the same data agree on overlaps, so their union defines a unique maximal smooth solution u on an interval [0,T∗), where T∗ is the supremum of its right endpoints.

1.2givenF2algebra

For 0≤t<T∗, [F2] and integration from 0 to t give ∥ω(t)∥22+2ν∫0t∥∇ω(s)∥22 ds=∥ω0∥22. Therefore, with B(t)=∥ω(t)∥H1, ∫0tB(s)2 ds≤∥ω0∥22(t+(2ν)−1).

1.3givenF4F6algebra

Fix an integer m≥4 and put Y(t)=∥u(t)∥Hm and S(t)=∑k≠0∣k∣∣u^(t,k)∣. Pair the full equation after applying Λm with Λmu. The pressure term vanishes because div⁡Λmu=0 and periodic integration by parts applies. Writing Λm(u⋅∇u)=u⋅∇Λmu+[Λm,u⋅∇]u, the first term has integral 12∫u⋅∇∣Λmu∣2dμ=0 by incompressibility and periodicity. The viscous term is −ν∥∇u∥Hm2≤0, while [F4] and Cauchy–Schwarz bound the remaining commutator pairing by CmSY2. Hence 12(Y2)′≤CmSY2. For Yϵ=(Y2+ϵ2)1/2 with ϵ>0, differentiation gives Yϵ′≤CmSY2/Yϵ≤CmSYϵ.

2.1givenF3step 1.3algebra

Set Zϵ=log⁡(e+Yϵ)≥1. By [F3], S≤Cm(1+Blog⁡(e+Y))≤Cm(1+BZϵ). Step 1.3 therefore gives Zϵ′≤Cm(1+BZϵ) and (Zϵ)′≤Cm(1+B), since Zϵ≥1.

3.1givenstep 1.2step 2.1algebra

Integrating step 2.1 and applying Cauchy–Schwarz in time with step 1.2 yields Zϵ(t)≤Zϵ(0)+Cm[t+∥ω0∥2t(t+12ν)]. Letting ϵ↓0 proves the displayed estimate in the Statement for each m≥4 and every t<T∗.

4.1givenF5step 3.1

If T∗<∞, step 3.1 with m=4 and t<T∗ has a finite right-hand side bounded uniformly by replacing t with T∗. Thus sup⁡t<T∗∥u(t)∥H4<∞. By [F5], the solution extends smoothly past T∗, contradicting maximality. Hence T∗=∞.

5.1givenF1step 3.1step 4.1∎

The local theorem [F1] gives smoothness and uniqueness on every restart interval, so the maximal solution is smooth on each compact time interval. Fix any T>0 and let τ be the supremum of times through which two global smooth solutions agree on [0,τ]. They agree at τ by continuity. Starting [F1] from their common value at τ gives a positive local interval on which uniqueness extends their agreement; therefore τ cannot be less than T. As T is arbitrary, they agree for all time. Since T∗=∞, step 3.1 supplies the asserted bound for every finite t and every integer m≥4.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources