Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pressure recovery for periodic incompressible Sobolev velocity

Statement

Let Qd=Rd/(2πZ)d have normalized measure dμ=(2π)−ddx. For α=(α1,…,αd)∈N0d, write ∣α∣=∑jαj and ∂α=∂1α1⋯∂dαd. Give C∞(Qd;R) the Fr'echet topology generated by pm(ϕ)=max⁡∣α∣≤m∥∂αϕ∥∞, for m∈N0, where the derivatives are those of the smooth periodic lift to Rd. A periodic distribution is a continuous real-linear functional on this test space, extended complex-linearly to complex-valued tests. For such a distribution S, define S^(k)=⟨S,e−ik⋅x⟩ for ek(x)=eik⋅x and define its mean to be S^(0)=⟨S,1⟩. For an integrable function g, the pairing is ⟨g,ϕ⟩=∫Qdgϕ dμ. Define distributional derivatives by ⟨∂jS,ϕ⟩=−⟨S,∂jϕ⟩. For a smooth scalar test, ∇ϕ=(∂1ϕ,…,∂dϕ) and Δϕ=∑j∂j2ϕ; for a smooth vector field v, div⁡v=∑j∂jvj, (v⊗v)ij=vivj, and (v⋅∇)vi=∑jvj∂jvi. In particular, div⁡u=0 distributionally means −∫Qdu⋅∇ϕ dμ=0 for every real test function ϕ. Equality of periodic distributions means equality on every such test function. Assume Countable Choice. Let d∈{1,2,3}, let s>d/2+1, and let u∈Hs(Qd;Rd) satisfy div⁡u=0 in this sense. Then u⊗u∈Hs, the mean-zero scalar π=Q(u⊗u) belongs to Hs, and in Hs−1, P(u⋅∇u)=u⋅∇u+∇π. Among mean-zero periodic distributions π~ for which this identity holds as an equality of periodic distributions, this pressure is unique. The formula is a torus pressure recovery result and asserts no wall pressure regularity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions stated in the formulation.

[F1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): countable families of nonempty sets admit a choice function.

[F2]

Periodic fluid Fourier Sobolev spaces: Hs is the completion in ∑kwk2s∣q^(k)∣2 with wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2 on the normalized periodic torus; for s≥0 each element has a unique L2 representative.

[F3]

Periodic Fourier embeddings and products: when σ>d/2, multiplication is continuous Hσ×Hσ→Hσ, and when σ>1+d/2, Hσ embeds in C1.

[F4]

Periodic Leray and pressure maps: P and Q are the stated bounded Fourier multipliers and ∇QF=−(I−P)div⁡F.

[F5]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: under Countable Choice, the characters e2πik⋅y form a complete orthonormal basis of L2(Rd/Zd), so Fourier synthesis recovers each L2 function from its coefficients; the change of variables x=2πy gives the same completeness for eik⋅x on Qd with its normalized measure.

Proof

Given: Countable Choice, d∈{1,2,3}, s>d/2+1, and divergence-free u∈Hs.

1.1givenF2F3F4

Since s>d/2, [F3] gives u⊗u∈Hs. The bounded map Q in [F4] therefore gives a mean-zero π=Q(u⊗u)∈Hs. The coefficientwise derivative convention in [F4] gives ∂ju∈Hs−1 because ∣kj∣≤wk; also u∈Hs−1 since wk≥1. Since s−1>d/2, [F3] places each product uj∂jui and hence u⋅∇u in Hs−1. The embedding in [F3] gives a C1 representative of u, since s>1+d/2.

2.1givenF3F4step 1.1algebra

The C1 representative from step 1.1 obeys the ordinary product rule. With the distributional derivative convention in the Statement, this is also the periodic distributional identity div⁡(u⊗u)i=∑j∂j(uiuj)=u⋅∇ui+uidiv⁡u=u⋅∇ui. Applying the multiplier identity in [F4] yields ∇π=−(I−P)(u⋅∇u), hence the asserted decomposition.

3.1givenF1F2F5step 2.1algebra∎

If another mean-zero periodic distribution π~ gives the same decomposition, then ∇S=0 for S=π~−π. The derivative convention implies ∂jS^(k)=ikjS^(k), so for each k≠0 the vector equation ikS^(k)=0 gives S^(k)=0; the zero mode also vanishes because S has mean zero. To see that this forces S=0 as a distribution, fix ϕ∈C∞(Qd). For every integer N≥1, periodic integration by parts gives wk2N∣ϕ^(k)∣≤∥(1−Δ)Nϕ∥L1(dμ). Choosing N arbitrarily large, the lattice shell bound #{k∈Zd:n≤∣k∣<n+1}≤Cd(n+1)d−1 follows by placing disjoint unit cubes at those lattice points: their union lies in an annulus of fixed enlarged width, whose volume is Od((n+1)d−1); the n=0 shell is finite. This bound shows that the Fourier series of ϕ and each of its differentiated series converge absolutely and uniformly. Its sum is therefore a smooth function with the same Fourier coefficients as ϕ; by [F5] the two functions agree in L2, hence everywhere by continuity. Thus finite Fourier sums converge to ϕ in every seminorm pm. The distribution S vanishes on every character and hence on every finite Fourier sum; its continuity gives ⟨S,ϕ⟩=0. Since ϕ was arbitrary, S=0, proving uniqueness among all mean-zero periodic distributions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources