Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth incompressible and symmetric-system stability

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let d∈{1,2,3}, let s≥4 be an integer, and use the normalized torus Qd=Rd/(2πZ)d. For any two smooth real divergence-free initial velocities, the local incompressible IVP theorem supplies unique smooth periodic solutions uν1,uν2 for each ν1,ν2≥0 on a common interval [0,T]. For fixed data, this interval and the local theorem's bound in each integer Hm, m≥s, can be chosen independently of ν1,ν2. Put w=uν1−uν2 and L(t)=∥∇uν2(t)∥L∞. Then ∥w(t)∥L2≤e∫0tL(τ) dτ∥w(0)∥L2+∣ν1−ν2∣∫0te∫stL(τ) dτ∥Δuν2(s)∥L2 ds. In particular, if ν1=ν2=ν, the exact difference-energy supplier gives ∥w(t)∥L2≤e∫0tL(τ) dτ∥w(0)∥L2. For two smooth positive-density polytropic Euler solutions with the same κ>0 and γ>1, the symmetric variables q=(r,u) from the stated definition satisfy ∥q(t)−q~(t)∥L22≤∥q(0)−q~(0)∥L22exp⁡ ⁣(C∫0t(∥∇q(τ)∥L∞+∥∇q~(τ)∥L∞) dτ). In either system, if both solutions have a common bound M in Hs on [0,T], then the Hs−1 difference is bounded by the L2 difference to the power 1/s times (2M)(s−1)/s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the normalized periodic Fourier conventions, and the solution pairs in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Local smooth periodic Euler and Navier–Stokes: for smooth real divergence-free data and fixed ν≥0, the normalized periodic incompressible equation has a unique smooth local solution on an interval whose length depends on d,s, and the initial Hs norm, but not on ν or higher norms.

[F2]

Sound-speed variables for polytropic Euler and Local smooth positive-density polytropic Euler: positive-density polytropic Euler is transformed to qt+∑jAj(q)∂jq=0, where each Aj is a fixed linear symmetric-matrix map, and the local theorem supplies smooth positive-density solutions.

[F3]

Difference energy for given smooth incompressible and symmetric solutions: two already given smooth incompressible solutions with equal viscosity satisfy ∥u(t)−v(t)∥22≤∥u(0)−v(0)∥22exp⁡(2∫0t∥∇v(τ)∥∞dτ). For a symmetric system with fixed linear symmetric matrices, the squared L2 difference is at most its initial value times exp⁡(C∫0t(∥∇q∥∞+∥∇q~∥∞)dτ), with C depending only on the dimension and matrix maps. These are estimates for given smooth solutions, not existence assertions.

[F4]

Periodic fluid Fourier Sobolev spaces: Hs is the weighted Fourier coefficient norm with wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2 on Qd. Periodic Leray and pressure maps: P is a self-adjoint projection, maps divergence-free fields to themselves, and commutes with derivatives.

[F5]

Tame transport commutator: for integers m≥s≥4, each scalar coordinate satisfies ∥[Λm,f]∂jg∥2≤Cd,m,s(∥f∥Hm∥g∥Hs+∥f∥Hs∥g∥Hm), where Λm is the Fourier multiplier wkm.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F4F5algebra

Let the two initial velocities be u0,i, i=1,2, and put Mi=∥u0,i∥Hs. By [F1], for each datum there is an existence time Ti>0 depending only on d,s,Mi, independent of its viscosity. For any of these smooth solutions, pair its projected equation after applying Λm with Λmu, for an integer m≥s. By [F4], the projections disappear; the term ∫u⋅∇∣Λmu∣2/2 vanishes by periodicity and incompressibility. The componentwise commutator estimate [F5] bounds the remaining transport pairing by Cm∥u∥Hs∥u∥Hm2, and viscosity contributes −ν∥∇u∥Hm2≤0. Thus 12(∥u∥Hm2)′≤Cm∥u∥Hs∥u∥Hm2, with constants independent of ν. At m=s, regularizing the norm if necessary and integrating the reciprocal inequality gives ∥ui(t)∥Hs≤2Mi up to [2Csmax⁡(1,Mi)]−1 within its existence interval; if Mi=0, uniqueness identifies the solution with zero. Choose T as the minimum of the two Ti and these two reciprocal bounds. For each m≥s, multiplication of the squared-norm inequality by e−4CmMit now gives ∥ui(t)∥Hm≤∥u0,i∥Hme2CmMit on [0,T]. Both T and these all-order bounds are independent of the two viscosities.

1.2givenF4algebra

For possibly different viscosities, subtract the two projected equations. The identity uν1⋅∇uν1−uν2⋅∇uν2=uν1⋅∇w+w⋅∇uν2 gives wt+P(uν1⋅∇w+w⋅∇uν2)=ν1Δw+(ν1−ν2)Δuν2. Pair with w. Since Pw=w and P is self-adjoint, it disappears from the inner product. Periodicity and div⁡uν1=0 cancel the first transport term; the second is bounded by L(t)∥w∥22; and ν1∫w⋅Δw=−ν1∥∇w∥22≤0. Thus, with R(t)=∣ν1−ν2∣∥Δuν2(t)∥2, 12(∥w∥22)′≤L(t)∥w∥22+R(t)∥w∥2.

1.3givenA1F2F3

In the polytropic branch, [F2] places the two given solutions in the symmetric system with fixed linear symmetric matrices. The symmetric part of [F3] therefore applies directly and gives the displayed squared L2 estimate with exactly its stated gradient integral.

2.1givenF3step 1.1algebra

In the incompressible case with equal viscosity, apply the integrated estimate [F3] to the solutions from step 1.1 and take square roots. This gives the asserted norm bound with factor exp⁡(∫0tL(τ) dτ).

2.2step 1.2algebra

Replace ∥w∥2 by yϵ=(∥w∥22+ϵ2)1/2, differentiate, integrate the scalar inequality from step 1.2 with factor exp⁡(−∫0tL), and let ϵ↓0. This yields the displayed residual estimate, including times at which w=0.

3.1givenF4step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra

For any s≥1, weighted coefficient Holder gives ∥w∥Hs−1≤∥w∥21/s∥w∥Hs(s−1)/s. Using the common Hs bound M from step 1.1 yields the stated factor (2M)(s−1)/s for either solution pair.

4.1givenF4step 3.1algebra∎

Apply the coefficient Holder estimate from step 3.1 to the two symmetric states. Their common Hs bound gives the same Hs−1 continuity estimate.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources