How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Airy envelopes and asymptotic coefficients
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be the entire Airy function of Airy contour and Fresnel normalization and define, for real , Then:
(a) is well defined and smooth on , extends to an entire solution of , and the Wronskian identity holds for all complex ;
(b) as , with ,
(c) Envelopes. With and there is a constant with for all real , and there is with for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the entire functions and real .
is entire with , and its positive and negative asymptotics and the estimate of its oscillatory representation are known (Airy contour and Fresnel normalization).
The exponential integral is absolutely convergent with all derivatives uniformly convergent on compact real sets. The sine integral is conditionally convergent, uniformly on compact real sets, as is its first derivative: integrate the tails by parts against . For higher derivatives use distributions in ; pairing against smooth compactly supported tests supplies rapid Fourier decay. Integration by parts in then gives and as distributions, with the finite endpoint at supplying the signs. Thus the continuous function satisfies distributionally, meaning for every smooth compactly supported real test . It is a classical smooth solution: twice integrating the continuous function locally leaves a distribution with second derivative zero, hence an affine function (convolving locally with a smooth approximate identity gives affine smooth functions, and passing to the locally uniform limit gives the same conclusion). Iteration then gives smoothness. The Airy Taylor recurrence extends its Cauchy data uniquely to an entire solution (the recurrence is for and , giving infinite radius by the ratio test on each of the three coefficient subsequences). (Dominated convergence, Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions, algebra).
The substitution computations: for , in the exponential integral and with the Fresnel identity in the sine integral (Airy contour and Fresnel normalization, Complex Gaussian continuation).
Proof
[Definition and ODE] By [F2], is smooth and satisfies since the two one-sided forcing terms cancel; analytic continuation gives an entire solution.
[Positive asymptotics] For , substitute in . Its exponent is , with . On this domain the real exponent after removal of is at most . Split at : the outer contribution is exponentially small; on the central part expand the cubic exponential through its linear term. That linear term is odd and integrates to zero on the symmetric central interval; the remainder is bounded by after multiplication by the Gaussian. Thus . For the extra amplitude gives the same relative bound: its extra linear term is odd, and its first nonzero cross term is also of relative order . The nonstationary sine integral at positive is , and its first derivative is polynomially bounded, by integration by parts after scaling with phase derivative . Both are negligible relative to the exponential terms. This proves the positive formulas in (b).
[Negative asymptotics and endpoint cancellation] Substituting gives , since and the moments against are finite. In the sine integral use , , and the phase . Near the endpoint , integration by parts supplies ; the next endpoint terms start at because the second derivative of the phase vanishes there. Near , the compact Morse-coordinate/Fourier-moment estimate proved in [F1] gives the stationary contribution with absolute error . On the remaining region repeated nonstationary integration gives a smaller error. The two endpoint contributions cancel in . Apply the same argument directly to the first differentiated integrals (amplitude ), not by differentiating an unspecified remainder: the endpoint terms cancel again, and the stationary term is with absolute error . This gives the negative formulas in (b).
[Wronskian and envelopes] has derivative by step 1.1 and [F1]. Taking in step 2.1 and [F1] gives the constant . The upper envelopes follow from steps 2.1 and 2.2 outside a compact interval and continuity inside it. For the lower envelope, [F1] gives and for large positive . In fact has no zero on : if there were a last zero , positivity on would give there, so would be increasing with limit zero and hence nonpositive, contradicting for . A last zero exists if any does, since zeros are isolated and positivity already holds beyond a fixed compact interval. The positive asymptotics and the positive minimum of on that compact interval now yield the global lower envelope. This proves (a)-(c).