Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-turn barrier tunnelling error

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix m>0. Let V∈Cc5(R;R) be fixed and let E>0 be such that V−E has exactly two simple zeros a<b, is positive on (a,b) and negative outside [a,b] with nonvanishing derivative at a,b. Set q(x):=2m(V(x)−E) and consider the explicitly parameterized family uh′′(x)=q(x)h2uh(x),h>0. The quantities and h are nondimensional after fixed scales have been chosen; the physical reading is the scaled family, with the physical ℏ fixed. Choose L>0 with supp⁡V⊂(−L,L) and put p0:=2mE. Define the scattering amplitudes r(h),t(h) by the exact solution with one incoming wave from the left and none from the right: uh(x)=p0−1/2(eip0x/h+r(h)e−ip0x/h)(x≤−L),uh(x)=p0−1/2t(h)eip0x/h(x≥L). Here the conserved dimensionless current is Jh(u):=hIm⁡(u‾ u′); the exterior waves p0−1/2e±ip0x/h have currents ±1. The transmission coefficient is the transmitted-to-incoming current ratio T(h):=∣t(h)∣2. The proof establishes existence and uniqueness of these amplitudes. Put B:=∫ab2m(V−E) dx and S:=B/h. Then there are h0>0, an ε(h)≤Ch for 0<h<h0, and a constant C0 such that the transmission coefficient is T(h)=e−2S[1+O(ε(h)+e−2S)], quantitatively ∣T(h)e2S−1∣≤C0[ε(h)+e−2S]1−C0[ε(h)+e−2S] whenever the denominator is positive. The bound holds for fixed V,E with the stated separated simple turning points; rectangular walls, coalescing turning points, barrier-top uniformity and resonant multiwell interference are excluded.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m>0, the potential V, the energy E with separated simple turning points a<b, the scaled equation uh′′=quh/h2, the normalized exterior waves, and small h>0.

[F1]

Allowed-region WKB control with explicit error O(ε(h)) on intervals bounded away from the turning points, in the form of WKB explicit error (b)–(c) (WKB explicit error).

[F2]

Liouville transformation at each simple turning point reduces the equation to w′′=[ζ/h2+R]w with bounded R. The stable Volterra estimates give two independent exact real solutions dl,gl at each turn l∈{a,b}, normalized so that their forbidden-side leading forms are q−1/4e−Sl(x) and q−1/4eSl(x), respectively. Their allowed-side leading forms are 2p−1/2sin⁡Θl and p−1/2cos⁡Θl, with the same value and slope errors O(ε(h)) on fixed matching sections. Here p=−q, Sa(x)=h−1∫axq, Sb(x)=h−1∫xbq in the barrier, and Θl is the outward allowed-side action divided by h plus π/4. Reflection is used at b (Liouville turning-point transformation, Stable weighted Airy Volterra connection).

[F3]

Airy matching remainders of order h/∣ζ∣3/2 on fixed matching sections, absorbed into ε(h) (Airy envelopes and asymptotic coefficients, Stable weighted Airy Volterra connection).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

[Exact exterior solutions and flux] Define fL(x)=p0−1/2e−ip0x/h on x≤−L and fR(x)=p0−1/2eip0x/h on x≥L, and extend each by its Cauchy data through the compact interaction interval. Existence and uniqueness follow directly from the first-order integral equation for (u,u′): its continuous coefficient matrix is bounded on each compact interval, and the ordered Picard iterates are bounded by Mnℓn/n!; their uniformly convergent sum solves the equation, and the same iterates applied to a difference give uniqueness. Thus no interval Dirichlet spectral/domain supplier is required. Since q is real, Jh′=hIm⁡(∣u′∣2+q∣u∣2/h2)=0. On the left write uniquely fR=AhinfL‾+AhoutfL. The currents are Jh(fR)=1 and Jh(fL)=−1, so ∣Ahin∣2−∣Ahout∣2=1, in particular Ahin≠0. Consequently uh=fR/Ahin has precisely the prescribed boundary form, with t=1/Ahin and r=Ahout/Ahin, uniquely. With W(u,v):=uv′−u′v, W(fL,fL‾)=2i/h and therefore Ahin=hW(fL,fR)/(2i).

1.2F1F2F3algebra

[A single error budget and outgoing coefficients] Choose fixed allowed matching sections on either side of each turn and a fixed interior point x0∈(a,b). Let ε(h) be the sum of the two Volterra errors eεh,l−1, the allowed-region coefficient errors eh∫∣qWKB∣/p−1 on the fixed intervals connecting these sections to ±L, and the Airy matching remainders h/∣ζl∣3/2 at the sections and x0. All integrals and matching locations are fixed, hence ε(h)≤Ch for small h. In the allowed region use the scaled state (p1/2u,hp−1/2u′). The leading sine/cosine states of [F2] form an invertible two-by-two matrix with inverse bounded independently of h, since their phases enter only through sine and cosine; the amplitude-derivative terms are O(h). [F1] transports each exterior outgoing wave to this section with coefficient error O(ε). Since eiΘl=cos⁡Θl+isin⁡Θl, solving the perturbed bounded matrix gives, for constants γL,γR of modulus one, fL=γL[(1+O(ε))ga+(i/2+O(ε))da],fR=γR[(1+O(ε))gb+(i/2+O(ε))db]. Both outward phase conventions have positive Θl derivative toward the corresponding exterior, so eiΘl denotes the outgoing wave on each side. Inversion is justified for small h by the finite-matrix Neumann series; no exponentially weighted matrix is inverted here.

2.1step 1.2F2F3algebra

[The interior Wronskian] Write Sa=Sa(x0), Sb=Sb(x0), so Sa+Sb=S=B/h. In the common state coordinates Y(u):=(q(x0)1/4u(x0),hq(x0)−1/4u′(x0))T, [F2]-[F3] give Y(ga)=eSa[(1,1)T+O(ε)],Y(da)=e−Sa[(1,−1)T+O(ε)], Y(gb)=eSb[(1,−1)T+O(ε)],Y(db)=e−Sb[(1,1)T+O(ε)]. The O(ε) terms include the fixed-section amplitude-derivative errors O(h). Since det⁡(Y(u),Y(v))=hW(u,v), the growing/growing term in step 1.2 is −2γLγReS(1+O(ε)). Each mixed determinant has zero leading determinant (its two leading vectors coincide), hence is O(ε)eSa−Sb or O(ε)e−Sa+Sb. Relative to eS these are bounded by O(ε)e−2Sb and O(ε)e−2Sa, respectively. The decaying/decaying term is O(e−S). Thus hW(fL,fR)=−2γLγReS[1+O(ε)+O(e−2S)]. This calculation controls the dominant determinant directly and avoids unstable inversion of exponentially separated columns.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

[Quantitative transmission error] By steps 1.1 and 2.1 and ∣γLγR∣=1, ∣Ahin∣2e−2S=1+ηh, where ηh is real and ∣ηh∣≤C0[ε(h)+e−2S] after enlarging a fixed C0 to absorb the square of the amplitude error for sufficiently small h. Since T=∣Ahin∣−2, one has Te2S=(1+ηh)−1 and consequently ∣Te2S−1∣≤C0[ε(h)+e−2S]1−C0[ε(h)+e−2S] whenever its denominator is positive. This is the claimed quantitative bound and implies T=e−2B/h[1+O(ε(h)+e−2B/h)]. Constants depend only on m,V,E and the fixed sections, and the excluded cases do not satisfy the hypotheses used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources