How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Liouville turning-point transformation
Statement
Let with , and let have a single simple zero at : , , has the sign of , and on . Let and define Then:
(a) , , with . Define ; then is ;
(b) For each solving on , define by this is well-defined by (a), and . The function is and satisfies with where denotes the second derivative with respect to ; the formula defines a continuous bounded real function on through the invertible map ;
(c) the constants implicit in (a)–(b) depend only on and the interval.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the interval , the function with a single simple zero at , , and the transformation data defined in the Statement.
Define and for . Then and, for , ; for the difference quotients are dominated by , so dominated convergence gives each derivative formula and its continuity, hence . The sign assumptions give on , hence . With , dominated convergence applied successively to the difference quotients, bounded by for , gives the continuous derivatives and . Since , substitution yields and (Dominated convergence, The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
The identity follows without losing the sign: for , differentiate . The signs of and of this signed integral both equal , so . Thus off zero, , and multiplication by gives the required signed identity. At zero it follows by continuity, and [F1] gives . The interval is compact by Heine–Borel, and the continuous positive function attains a positive minimum there by the extreme-value theorem (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set).
Change of variables in the differential equation: inserting into and using cancels the first-derivative term and leaves the stated equation with the displayed (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , algebra).
Continuous real functions on compact intervals are Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion). Their primitives have derivative equal to the integrand, including relative endpoint derivatives (The first fundamental theorem: if is integrable on and continuous at , then ; in particular a continuous has as a primitive), and for a real function , (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative). All continuous finite-interval integrals here can be computed by Riemann sums, with the same values as their Lebesgue integrals. Applied to on , this gives ; applied to , it licenses the differentiation in [F2]. For the difference-quotient bounds in [F1], the same identity bounds each increment by the interval length times the stated supremum of its continuous derivative. No choice hypothesis is needed for these scalar identities.
Proof
[Regularity of the transformation] [F1] gives and near ; on , is and nonzero, so is there too, and the two descriptions glue with matching derivatives at because both are given by the integral formula. Hence on the interval and .
[The transformed equation] The bound and [F4] give for , so is a continuous strictly increasing bijection onto its image with a continuous inverse. The inverse difference quotient gives ; differentiating this identity shows the inverse is , with the corresponding one-sided endpoint derivatives. Thus is . The product and chain rules give ; differentiating gives . Dividing by and using proves [F3]. By [F3], solves with . Since and are and bounded below on the compact interval, is continuous and bounded with a bound depending only on and the interval.
[Conclusion] Claims (a), (b), (c) are steps 1.1 and 2.1 and the dependence of all constants on and the interval.
Depends on
The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
Dominated convergence
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
The first fundamental theorem: if is integrable on and continuous at , then ; in particular a continuous has as a primitive
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions (1974), Chapter 11 (Liouville transformation and turning-point theory) — classical monograph treatment consulted through the DLMF survey of Airy-type asymptotics
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Sections 9.2 and 9.7 (Airy's differential equation and Airy-type connection formulas)