Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Liouville turning-point transformation

Statement

Let J=[−x−,x+] with x−,x+>0, and let q∈C5(J;R) have a single simple zero at 0: q(0)=0, q′(0)>0, q(x) has the sign of x, and q≠0 on [−x−,0)∪(0,x+]. Let h>0 and define ζ(x):=sign⁡(x)[32∣∫0x∣q(s)∣ ds∣]2/3. Then:

(a) ζ∈C4, ζ(ζ′)2=q, ζ′>0 with min⁡ζ′>0. Define a(x):=(ζ′(x))−1/2; then a>0 is C3;

(b) For each u∈C2(J;C) solving u′′(x)=q(x)u(x)/h2 on J, define w:ζ(J)→C by w(y):=u(ζ−1(y))a(ζ−1(y)); this is well-defined by (a), and u(x)=a(x)w(ζ(x)). The function w is C2 and satisfies w′′(ζ)=[ζ/h2+R(ζ)]w(ζ) with R(ζ(x))=−a′′(x)a(x) (ζ′(x))2, where a′′ denotes the second derivative with respect to x; the formula defines a continuous bounded real function on ζ([−x−,x+]) through the invertible map x↦ζ(x);

(c) the constants implicit in (a)–(b) depend only on q and the interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the interval J, the function q with a single simple zero at 0, h>0, and the transformation data ζ,a defined in the Statement.

[F1]

Define b(0):=q′(0) and b(x):=q(x)/x for x≠0. Then b(x)=∫01q′(tx) dt and, for 0≤k≤4, b(k)(x)=∫01tkq(k+1)(tx) dt; for k<4 the difference quotients are dominated by tk+1sup⁡J∣q(k+2)∣, so dominated convergence gives each derivative formula and its continuity, hence b∈C4(J). The sign assumptions give b>0 on J, hence g:=b∈C4(J). With G(x):=∫01t1/2g(tx) dt, dominated convergence applied successively to the difference quotients, bounded by tk+3/2sup⁡J∣g(k+1)∣ for k<4, gives the continuous derivatives G(k)(x)=∫01tk+1/2g(k)(tx) dt and G∈C4(J). Since G>0, substitution s=xt yields ζ(x)=x[(3/2)G(x)]2/3∈C4(J) and ζ′(0)=b(0)1/3>0 (Dominated convergence, The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).

[F2]

The identity ζ(ζ′)2=q follows without losing the sign: for x≠0, differentiate ∣ζ(x)∣3/2=32∣∫0x∣q(s)∣ds∣. The signs of ζ and of this signed integral both equal sign⁡x, so ∣ζ∣1/2ζ′=∣q∣. Thus ζ′>0 off zero, ∣ζ∣(ζ′)2=∣q∣, and multiplication by sign⁡x gives the required signed identity. At zero it follows by continuity, and [F1] gives ζ′(0)>0. The interval J is compact by Heine–Borel, and the continuous positive function ζ′ attains a positive minimum there by the extreme-value theorem (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set).

[F3]

Change of variables in the differential equation: inserting u(x)=a(x)w(ζ(x)) into u′′=qu/h2 and using ζ(ζ′)2=q cancels the first-derivative term and leaves the stated equation with the displayed R (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), algebra).

[F4]

Continuous real functions on compact intervals are Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion). Their primitives have derivative equal to the integrand, including relative endpoint derivatives (The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive), and for a C1 real function f, f(v)−f(u)=∫uvf′(s)ds (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative). All continuous finite-interval integrals here can be computed by Riemann sums, with the same values as their Lebesgue integrals. Applied to t↦q(tx) on [0,1], this gives q(x)=x∫01q′(tx)dt; applied to s↦∣q(s)∣, it licenses the differentiation in [F2]. For the difference-quotient bounds in [F1], the same identity bounds each increment by the interval length times the stated supremum of its continuous derivative. No choice hypothesis is needed for these scalar identities.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4algebra

[Regularity of the transformation] [F1] gives ζ∈C4 and ζ′>0 near 0; on [−x−,0)∪(0,x+], q is C5 and nonzero, so ζ is C4 there too, and the two descriptions glue with matching derivatives at 0 because both are given by the integral formula. Hence ζ′≥c>0 on the interval and a=(ζ′)−1/2∈C3.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

[The transformed equation] The bound ζ′≥c>0 and [F4] give ζ(v)−ζ(u)≥c(v−u) for u<v, so ζ is a continuous strictly increasing bijection onto its image with a continuous inverse. The inverse difference quotient gives (ζ−1)′(y)=1/ζ′(ζ−1(y)); differentiating this identity shows the inverse is C2, with the corresponding one-sided endpoint derivatives. Thus w=(u/a)∘ζ−1 is C2. The product and chain rules give u′′=a′′w+(2a′ζ′+aζ′′)w′+a(ζ′)2w′′; differentiating a=(ζ′)−1/2 gives 2a′ζ′+aζ′′=0. Dividing by a(ζ′)2 and using q=ζ(ζ′)2 proves [F3]. By [F3], w solves w′′=[ζ/h2+R]w with R(ζ(x))=−a′′(x)/[a(x)(ζ′(x))2]. Since a and ζ′ are C3 and bounded below on the compact interval, R is continuous and bounded with a bound depending only on q and the interval.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

[Conclusion] Claims (a), (b), (c) are steps 1.1 and 2.1 and the dependence of all constants on q and the interval.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources