How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded fixed-N operator
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The Axiom of Choice). Let , let and , write points of as with , and let be the Plancherel transform of Plancherel theorem with the convention on (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes). Define the quadratic weight and the free kinetic operator (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators). Let be measurable and bounded, with , and let be multiplication by (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Hilbert space). Then:
(a) is a self-adjoint positive operator with domain , and is the Sobolev space as a set, with equivalent to the graph norm (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms, Adjoint of a densely defined operator);
(b) with is self-adjoint and bounded below by ; the space is a core for both and (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), Relative boundedness with respect to an operator);
(c) for every the operator on , with domain , is self-adjoint and bounded below by .
In particular, if and () are measurable and bounded and , then and (a)-(c) apply. No Hunziker-van Winter-Zhislin threshold statement, no stability of matter, no thermodynamic-limit and no physical interpretation is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the integers , masses , the constant , the weight and free operator , a real bounded measurable , and the perturbation .
For a real measurable finite-valued function on , the multiplier on is self-adjoint; the Plancherel transform is unitary with (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators (a), Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform on complex L1 classes).
Unitary equivalence preserves self-adjointness: if is unitary and is self-adjoint with domain , then with domain is self-adjoint, and is equivalent to (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Hilbert space).
Fourier characterization of Sobolev spaces: with equivalent norm, and is dense in (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).
Kato-Rellich: if is self-adjoint and is symmetric with and on for some , then on is self-adjoint, and if moreover then in the quadratic-form sense (Kato-Rellich theorem, Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).
If are operators on the same Hilbert space with symmetric and a core for the self-adjoint , then is essentially self-adjoint with (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores).
Proof
[Self-adjointness of ] The function is real, measurable and finite-valued, so is self-adjoint on by [F1]; conjugating by the unitary ([F1]) gives that is self-adjoint with ([F2]). For , , so .
[Finitely many components] Let be Hilbert spaces and let be self-adjoint on for . On the direct sum with domain define . Then is symmetric (componentwise), and if is in the domain with and , then componentwise and ; closedness of gives , and , so is closed. Testing the adjoint componentwise shows and ; a symmetric densely defined operator whose adjoint has the same domain is self-adjoint. If all and , then whenever , because the quadratic form is the sum of the components.
[Identification with and the core] For one has for suitable positive constants depending only on ; hence if and only if , i.e. , with equivalent norms by [F3]. Since is dense in ([F3]) and the graph norm of is equivalent to the norm, is a core for , and is the unique self-adjoint extension of ([F5]).
[Bounded perturbation] Since , the operator is bounded with ; it is symmetric as multiplication by a real function, and on the bound exhibits the admissible pair . By [F4] with and , is self-adjoint on and bounded below by . Moreover and , so the graph norms of and are equivalent on ; hence the core of step 2.1 is also a core for . This proves (a) and (b).
[The scalar case with components] The Hilbert space is identified with componentwise; under this identification is the direct sum of copies of with domain . By step 3.1 and step 1.2 it is self-adjoint and bounded below by , which is (c).
[Conclusion and scope] Steps 1.1-3.1 prove (a), (b) and (c); the displayed reduction for external and pair potentials only uses the triangle inequality for essential suprema, . No HVZ threshold, stability, thermodynamic-limit or physical-interpretation claim is made.
Depends on
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Plancherel theorem
Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms
Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
Kato-Rellich theorem
Relative boundedness with respect to an operator
Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators
Adjoint of a densely defined operator
Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores
Hilbert space
A bounded linear operator between normed spaces
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 6.1 pp. 133-137 (Kato-Rellich theorem and bounded perturbations of the free Hamiltonian)
- S. Pratt, Lecture Notes on Quantum Mechanics (Michigan State University, PHY 851/852; retrieved via the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-04-21), Chapter 9 Sections 9.1-9.3 pp. 135-138 (field operators and second quantized Hamiltonians)