Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rectangular barrier: transmission coefficients and the thick-barrier error

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let a>0, let U>E>0 and m,ℏ>0, and put k:=2mEℏ>0,κ:=2m(U−E)ℏ>0. Consider bounded functions ψ:R→C that are C1 on R, twice continuously differentiable on each of (−∞,0), (0,a), (a,∞), and satisfy −ℏ22mψ′′+Vψ=Eψ,V(x)={U,0<x<a,0otherwise, on each of the three intervals. Then:

(a) exactly one such ψ has the transmission asymptotics: its restriction to (−∞,0) equals eikx+re−ikx and its restriction to (a,∞) equals teikx, for uniquely determined r,t∈C;

(b) with D:=2cosh⁡(κa)+i(κk−kκ)sinh⁡(κa), t=2e−ikaD,T:=∣t∣2=[1+U2sinh⁡2(κa)4E(U−E)]−1,R:=∣r∣2=1−T;

(c) with q:=e−2κa, C:=U2/(4E(U−E)) and δ:=(4C−2)q+q2, T=(4/C) q1+δ. Put η:=∣4C−2∣q+q2. Whenever η<1, ∣T−16E(U−E)U2 q∣≤16E(U−E)U2 q η1−η. In addition, whenever ∣δ∣≤12, ∣T−16E(U−E)U2 q∣≤32E(U−E)U2 q ∣δ∣.

No L2 normalisation is asserted: ψ is a bounded generalised solution, not an element of L2(R).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a,U,E,m,ℏ>0 with U>E; k,κ as displayed; the piecewise constant V.

[F1]

For κ>0, e±κx have derivatives ±κe±κx (The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡); for k>0, cos⁡(kx) and sin⁡(kx) have derivatives −ksin⁡(kx) and kcos⁡(kx) (Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives). Step 1.1 proves directly from these identities that every C2 solution of v′′=κ2v is a linear combination of eκx,e−κx, and every solution of v′′=−k2v is a linear combination of cos⁡(kx),sin⁡(kx).

[F2]

The exponential definitions of Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential are cosh⁡s=(es+e−s)/2, sinh⁡s=(es−e−s)/2, cos⁡s=(eis+e−is)/2 and sin⁡s=(eis−e−is)/(2i). The series in The complex exponential by its power series gives e0=1, and exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential gives ese−s=eise−is=1. Substitution yields cosh⁡0=1, sinh⁡0=0, cosh⁡2s−sinh⁡2s=1 and cos⁡2s+sin⁡2s=1. For real s, the real extension is real and es=(es/2)2>0, since the reciprocal identity makes es/2≠0; thus cosh⁡s≥1 by (es/2−e−s/2)2≥0. Finally, Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives gives ddxcosh⁡(κx)=κsinh⁡(κx) and ddxsinh⁡(κx)=κcosh⁡(κx).

[F3]

If J(x)=Im⁡(ψ(x)‾ψ′(x)) is piecewise C1 and ψ′′=λ(x)ψ with λ real-valued on an interval, then J′=Im⁡(∣ψ′∣2+ψ‾ψ′′)=Im⁡(λ∣ψ∣2)=0 on that interval, so J is constant there (The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point); here λ=2m(V−E)/ℏ2 is real on each of the three intervals.

[F4]

The complex exponential power series differentiates term by term, so exp⁡′(z)=exp⁡z (Inside its disc of convergence a complex power series is holomorphic and may be differentiated term by term, The complex exponential by its power series). For real h, the difference quotient along x↦ikx therefore gives ddxeikx=ikeikx and ddxe−ikx=−ike−ikx.

[F5]

For real s, Euler's identity gives eis=cos⁡s+isin⁡s and ∣eis∣=1 (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0); addition of complex exponentials gives eise−is=1 and hence eis‾=e−is (exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

[Shape of bounded solutions] On either exterior interval the equation is ψ′′=−k2ψ. At any point x0, the matrix sending (A,B) to the value and derivative of Acos⁡(kx)+Bsin⁡(kx) has determinant k≠0, so choose A,B to match any solution's data there. The difference w then solves w′′=−k2w with w(x0)=w′(x0)=0; differentiating ∣w′∣2+k2∣w∣2 and using [F1] shows it is constant, hence zero, so every solution is Acos⁡(kx)+Bsin⁡(kx) and is bounded on each half-line. On (0,a) let v solve v′′=κ2v and put g:=v′−κv. Then g′=−κg, so (eκxg)′=0 and g=Ce−κx. Solving (e−κxv)′=Ce−2κx gives v=Aeκx+Be−κx. Thus each interval has a two-dimensional solution space; a function satisfying the regularity in the statement is described by two constants on each interval, with no boundedness restriction on the exterior coefficients.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F4F5algebra

[Matching and the transfer matrix] Write ψ<,ψ0,ψ> for the three restrictions. The conditions that ψ be C1 at 0 and a are the four linear equations ψ<(0)=ψ0(0),ψ<′(0)=ψ0′(0),ψ0(a)=ψ>(a),ψ0′(a)=ψ>′(a), and the transmission asymptotics of (a) impose the incoming coefficient 1 and the incoming-from-right coefficient 0. By [F4], their boundary data are (1+r,ik(1−r)) at 0 and (teika,ikteika) at a. The map carrying the interior data (ψ0(0),ψ0′(0)) to (ψ0(a),ψ0′(a)) is the matrix M:=(cosh⁡(κa)κ−1sinh⁡(κa)κsinh⁡(κa)cosh⁡(κa)): its columns are the values at a of the two solutions x↦cosh⁡(κx) and x↦κ−1sinh⁡(κx) of ψ′′=κ2ψ with data (1,0) and (0,1) at 0, and by [F1] every solution of the interior equation is a unique linear combination of these two. Hence the matching equations at 0 and a are equivalent to the single vector equation (teikaikteika)=M(1+rik(1−r)). Multiplying by M−1=(cosh⁡(κa)−κ−1sinh⁡(κa)−κsinh⁡(κa)cosh⁡(κa)), which is a two-sided inverse because det⁡M=cosh⁡2(κa)−sinh⁡2(κa)=1≠0 by [F2], and reading off the two components gives r=C+t−1 and r=1+Bt, where C+:=(cosh⁡(κa)−ikκsinh⁡(κa))eika and B:=−(cosh⁡(κa)+iκksinh⁡(κa))eika. Since C+−B=[2cosh⁡(κa)+i(κk−kκ)sinh⁡(κa)]eika=Deika and ∣D∣≥∣Re⁡D∣=2cosh⁡(κa)≥2>0, these two affine relations determine (r,t) uniquely: t=2/(C+−B)=2e−ika/D and r=C+t−1. Consequently a transmission solution has at most one pair (r,t) and hence at most one ψ, since (r,t) determines the interior data (1+r,ik(1−r)) and the two exterior pieces.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F4F5algebra

[Existence of the transmission solution] Conversely, let r:=C+t−1 and t:=2/(C+−B)=2e−ika/D be the unique pair of step 2.1, let ψ0 be the solution of ψ′′=κ2ψ on (0,a) with (ψ0(0),ψ0′(0))=(1+r,ik(1−r)) given explicitly by [F1], and define ψ(x):=eikx+re−ikx for x≤0, ψ:=ψ0 on (0,a) and ψ(x):=teikx for x≥a. The relations r=C+t−1 and r=1+Bt are exactly the two components of the vector equation of step 2.1, so (ψ0(a),ψ0′(a))=(teika,ikteika); hence the three pieces match in value and derivative at 0 and at a, the glued function is C1 on R and C∞ on each of the three open intervals with −ℏ22mψ′′+Vψ=Eψ by [F1, F4], and it is bounded, with exactly the prescribed transmission asymptotics. Together with the uniqueness of step 2.1 this proves (a) and gives the first display of (b), t=2e−ika/D.

4.1step 3.1F2F5algebra

[Transmission coefficient] Since [F5] gives ∣e−ika∣=1, T=∣t∣2=4/∣D∣2, and by [F2] ∣D∣2=4cosh⁡2(κa)+(κk−kκ)2sinh⁡2(κa)=4+[4+(κk−kκ)2]sinh⁡2(κa). Now (κk−kκ)2=(κ2−k2)2k2κ2=(2m(U−2E)/ℏ2)2k2κ2 because κ2−k2=2mℏ2((U−E)−E), and k2κ2=(2mE)(2m(U−E))/ℏ4, so 4+(κk−kκ)2=4E(U−E)+(U−2E)2E(U−E)=U2E(U−E). Therefore ∣D∣2=4+U2E(U−E)sinh⁡2(κa)=4[1+U2sinh⁡2(κa)4E(U−E)] and T=[1+U2sinh⁡2(κa)4E(U−E)]−1.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1F3F5algebra

[Flux conservation] Put J(x)=Im⁡(ψ(x)‾ψ′(x)). On each of the three intervals J is constant by [F3], and by continuity of ψ,ψ′ it is the same constant on all of R. By [F5], eikx‾=e−ikx and ∣eikx∣=1. On (−∞,0), ψ=eikx+re−ikx gives J=Im⁡[ik−ikre−2ikx+ikr‾e2ikx−ik∣r∣2]=k(1−∣r∣2) (the two oscillating terms sum to a real number and contribute no imaginary part). On (a,∞), ψ=teikx gives J=k∣t∣2. Hence k(1−∣r∣2)=k∣t∣2, i.e. R+T=1, which is the second display of (b).

6.1step 4.1F2algebra∎

[Thick-barrier form and controlled error] With q=e−2κa one has sinh⁡2(κa)=(eκa−e−κa)2/4=(q−1−2+q)/4, so with C=U2/(4E(U−E)), T=[1+C4(q−1−2+q)]−1=(4/C)q1+(4C−2)q+q2, multiplying numerator and denominator by 4q/C. Since 16E(U−E)/U2=4/C, the exact difference is T−4Cq=−4Cq δ1+δ,δ=(4C−2)q+q2. Put η=∣4C−2∣q+q2, so ∣δ∣≤η. If η<1, then ∣1+δ∣≥1−∣δ∣≥1−η>0 and ∣δ∣∣1+δ∣≤η1−η, which gives the first error bound in (c). If ∣δ∣≤12, then ∣1+δ∣≥12 and ∣T−4Cq∣≤4Cq⋅2∣δ∣, which is the second error bound in (c) after substituting 4/C=16E(U−E)/U2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources