How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak contractibility of the irreducible connection locus
Statement
Assume ZF together with the Axiom of Choice. Let be or , let , and let be any smooth principal right -bundle. Fix a smooth reference connection , a basepoint , and a frame of . Equip the affine space with its section topology, and let be the connections whose based holonomy action on has no nonzero proper invariant complex subspace. Then is nonempty and path-connected, and for every and every integer , . Here is the based homotopy group of continuous maps modulo homotopies that keep at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ZF and the Axiom of Choice; or ; ; a smooth principal right -bundle ; a smooth reference connection ; and a based irreducible connection when a basepoint is specified.
The Axiom of Choice means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
The batch-56 configuration definition sets and defines by irreducibility of the based holonomy action on . Its complete definition was inspected and its current Step 1 record is ready; the argument uses exactly this interface (Smooth and Sobolev configuration and reduced gauge spaces).
For every continuous map from a finite polyhedron into , with irreducible values on a subpolyhedron, the relative avoidance lemma supplies a homotopy fixed on that subpolyhedron and an open neighborhood of it whose endpoint is entirely irreducible. Its complete argument and exact batch-56 inputs were inspected; the configuration and stabilizer suppliers now have current ready Step 1 records (Relative finite-parameter avoidance of reducible connections).
is represented by continuous maps , with the zero class exactly the maps based-homotopic to the constant map (Higher homotopy group by based cubes).
Proof
The affine space contains . Apply [F2] to the constant map from a one-point polyhedron with empty subpolyhedron and value . Its endpoint is an element of , proving nonemptiness.
Let . The affine path is continuous in the Fréchet topology and has irreducible endpoints. Apply [F2] with and . The resulting endpoint path remains in and fixes both endpoints, so the locus is path-connected.
Fix and a based representative . The quotient is homeomorphic to , so regard as a continuous sphere map with value at the collapsed boundary point. Identify with the cone on and define for . For each continuous section seminorm , compactness of gives ; hence as . This proves continuity at the cone apex in every defining seminorm, and away from the apex continuity follows from continuity of and affine operations. Thus is a continuous filling of .
Apply [F2] to with and . Its boundary is already irreducible, so the endpoint is a map agreeing with on the boundary. Choose the based point with . Since the disk is convex, remains in the disk and fixes . Then is a homotopy from to the constant map at that fixes and remains in . Restricting it to gives a based nullhomotopy of ; by [F3], its class in is zero. Since and were arbitrary, every stated homotopy group vanishes.