Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed-dissipator finite response and integrable kernel

Statement

Let L0 be the finite Schrödinger generator trace-dual to G in Specified finite GNS detailed balance, and assume the gap hypotheses of Faithful scalar-kernel detailed balance gives a relaxation gap with d>1. Let A∈Md(C), B=B∗∈Md(C) be dimensionless observables, and let h:[0,T]→R be continuous with units joules. For dimensionless ϵ∈R, perturb only the Hamiltonian by Hϵ(t)=Hs−ϵh(t)B; hold the dissipator fixed. Let ρtϵ be the unique state solution with ρ0ϵ=σ, supplied by Continuous finite GKSL channel propagators.

Define A0:=A−Tr⁡(σA)I and, for τ≥0,

RAB(τ):=iℏTr⁡ ⁣(σ[eτGA0,B]).

Then, on every finite interval [0,T], the derivative at ϵ=0 exists and

ddϵTr⁡(ρtϵA)∣ϵ=0=∫0th(s)RAB(t−s) ds.

The kernel is absolutely integrable on [0,∞). If μ is the smallest eigenvalue of σ, then

∣RAB(τ)∣≤2∥B∥∞ℏμ e−γτ∥A0∥σ.

This is an open-system model response with a fixed dissipator. It does not assert that the driven stationary state is the Gibbs state of Hs−ϵhB.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite GKSL dynamics of L0, its trace-dual G, faithful stationary density σ, positive gap γ, Hermitian B, continuous field h, and initial preparation σ.

[F1]

Specified finite GNS detailed balance: G is the trace-dual observable generator i[Hs,⋅]/ℏ+D, with D(I)=0 and [Hs,σ]=0.

[F2]

Continuous finite GKSL channel propagators: a continuous finite GKSL family has a unique CPTP propagator on every compact time interval.

[F3]

Faithful scalar-kernel detailed balance gives a relaxation gap: σ is stationary, centered observables decay in ∥⋅∥σ at least as e−γt, and σ is faithful.

[F4]

Proof

1.1givenF2F3algebra

Put V(X):=i[B,X]/ℏ. The perturbed Schrödinger generator is Lϵ(t)=L0+ϵh(t)V. Since L0 leaves σ stationary by [F3], variation of constants gives

ρtϵ=σ+ϵ∫0th(s)e(t−s)L0V(σ) ds+ϵ2∫0≤u≤s≤th(s)h(u)e(t−s)L0Ve(s−u)L0V(ρuϵ) du ds.

The second integral is O(ϵ2) uniformly on [0,T]: h is bounded, V is a bounded linear map on the finite matrix space, sup⁡0≤s≤t≤T∥e(t−s)L0∥1<∞, and ∥ρuϵ∥1=1 because [F2] gives a channel propagator. Thus the first derivative exists and equals ∫0th(s)e(t−s)L0V(σ) ds.

2.1F1F4step 1.1algebra

By the generator duality in [F1], the exponential power series gives Tr⁡(AeτL0X)=Tr⁡(eτGA X) for every finite matrix X. Using [F4] and V(σ)=i[B,σ]/ℏ,

Tr⁡ ⁣(AeτL0V(σ))=iℏTr⁡ ⁣(σ[eτGA,B]).

The scalar part of A commutes with B, so A may be replaced by A0. Substituting this identity into step 1.1 gives the stated response formula.

3.1F3step 2.1algebra∎

Let C=eτGA0. The gap theorem gives ∥C∥σ≤e−γτ∥A0∥σ. If μ>0 is the smallest eigenvalue of σ, then

∥C∥∞≤∥Cσ1/2∥2μ=∥C∥σμ.

The finite density trace satisfies ∣Tr⁡(σM)∣≤∥M∥∞: diagonalize σ, write its nonnegative eigenvalues summing to one, and bound each diagonal matrix element of M by ∥M∥∞. Therefore ∣Tr⁡(σ[C,B])∣≤2∥B∥∞∥C∥∞, which proves the exponential bound and absolute integrability.

Remarks

If the bath rates or jump operators depended on the perturbing field, a derivative of the dissipator would appear in step 1.1. It is absent here by the explicit fixed-dissipator hypothesis. The formula is not a universal fluctuation-dissipation theorem and is not an empirical observation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources