Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Thermal balance makes Gibbs stationary

Statement

Let d≥1, let H=H∗∈Md(C) have entries in joules and a finite spectral decomposition H=∑EEPE with pairwise orthogonal projections summing to Id, and let S1,…,Sm be a finite family of dimensionless Hermitian matrices, where m≥0. Set ΩH={(E′−E)/ℏ:E,E′∈spec⁡(H)} and, for each ω∈ΩH, define Sa(ω)=∑E′−E=ℏωPESaPE′. Suppose that the rate matrices Γ(ω)=(γab(ω)), ω∈ΩH, have entries in seconds−1, are positive semidefinite in the explicit sense that Γ(ω)=Γ(ω)∗ and v∗Γ(ω)v≥0 for every v∈Cm, and satisfy γab(−ω)=e−βℏωγba(ω), with β∈R in joules−1 and ℏ>0 in joule-seconds. Let HLS=HLS∗ have entries in joules and commute with H, and let L be the finite generator

L(X)=−iℏ[H+HLS,X]+∑ω∈ΩH∑a,b=1mγab(ω)(Sb(ω)XSa(ω)∗−12{Sa(ω)∗Sb(ω),X}).

For ρ∈Md(C), being a density matrix means ρ=ρ∗, v∗ρv≥0 for every v∈Cd, and Tr⁡ρ=1; it is faithful when it is positive definite. For Zβ:=Tr⁡(e−βH)>0, define the faithful Gibbs density σβ:=e−βH/Zβ. For time t≥0 measured in seconds, Tt:=etL is completely positive and trace-preserving, and Tt(σβ)=σβ. This statement asserts stationarity only; it asserts neither uniqueness of the stationary density nor convergence to σβ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional system, energy-resolved couplings, rate matrices, balance relation, and commuting Lamb-shift matrix in the Statement. Use the ordered finite spectral projections and SI units there.

[A1]

Finite energy-resolved GKSL thermal model: for each ω, Sa(ω)=∑E′−E=ℏωPESaPE′; Γ(ω)=Γ(ω)∗ and v∗Γ(ω)v≥0 for every v∈Cm; and the matrices obey γab(−ω)=e−βℏωγba(ω). Also, HLS is Hermitian and commutes with H.

[F1]

Finite completely positive trace-preserving maps: complete positivity means positivity is preserved by every finite ancilla amplification, and trace preservation means traces agree on every matrix input; a finite channel is a complex-linear map with both properties.

[F2]

Finite GKSL generators and units: a finite GKSL generator has the form −i[H,X]/ℏ+∑j(JjXJj∗−12{Jj∗Jj,X}) for Hermitian H and finite jump matrices Jj.

[F3]

Finite GKSL generates CPTP semigroups: the finite GKSL generator of [F2] has an exponential semigroup of finite channels for all t≥0.

[F4]

Finite matrix spectral and state calculus: a finite Hermitian matrix has orthogonal spectral projections and basis-independent spectral calculus.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4algebraconstruct

For each ω, positive semidefiniteness of the finite matrix Γ(ω) gives a finite factorization γab(ω)=∑rcra(ω)‾crb(ω), with cra(ω) in seconds−1/2. Define Jr,ω:=∑bcrb(ω)Sb(ω). Expanding yields ∑rJr,ωXJr,ω∗=∑a,bγab(ω)Sb(ω)XSa(ω)∗ and ∑rJr,ω∗Jr,ω=∑a,bγab(ω)Sa(ω)∗Sb(ω). Thus the displayed generator has the finite GKSL form of [F2] with Hamiltonian H+HLS and finite jumps Jr,ω, so [F3] gives a finite channel semigroup; [F1] states its complete-positivity and trace-preservation content.

1.2givenA1F4algebra

From the spectral definition, [H,Sa(ω)]=−ℏωSa(ω) and Sa(ω)∗=Sa(−ω). Therefore Sa(ω)e−βH=e−βℏωe−βHSa(ω). Every Sa(−ω)Sb(ω) commutes with H because its two energy shifts cancel, hence it commutes with each spectral projection of H and with σβ. Also [HLS,H]=0 implies HLS preserves every eigenspace of H: if Hx=Ex, then H(HLSx)=HLS(Hx)=E(HLSx). Thus HLS commutes with every spectral projection of H and with σβ. Finally, the exponential e−βH is positive definite with positive finite trace, making σβ a faithful density.

2.1givenA1step 1.2algebra

Fix ω>0 and put q=e−βℏω. The ω contribution is Dω(σβ)=σβ∑a,bγab(ω)(qSb(ω)Sa(−ω)−Sa(−ω)Sb(ω)), using Sb(ω)σβ=qσβSb(ω) and commutation of the anticommutator product with σβ. For the negative frequency, substitute γab(−ω)=qγba(ω) and Sa(−ω)∗=Sa(ω), then reindex a,b to obtain D−ω(σβ)=σβ∑a,bγab(ω)(Sa(−ω)Sb(ω)−qSb(ω)Sa(−ω))=−Dω(σβ). Thus every nonzero frequency pair cancels.

3.1givenA1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

At ω=0, the balance relation gives γab(0)=γba(0). Each Sa(0) is Hermitian and commutes with H, hence with σβ; consequently the zero-frequency contribution is σβ∑a,bγab(0)(Sb(0)Sa(0)−Sa(0)Sb(0))=0, after swapping a,b in the first finite sum. The Hamiltonian contribution vanishes because both H and HLS commute with σβ. Together with step 2.1 this gives L(σβ)=0, and the exponential series then gives Tt(σβ)=σβ for all t≥0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources