Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality on compact metric spaces — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality for endpoint masses on a compact interval

Example

Let X=[0,1] with the Euclidean metric, let μ=δ0 and ν=δ1, where δa(A)=1 if a∈A and 0 otherwise for each Borel set A. For the base point x0=0, the coupling cost is W1X(μ,ν)=1, and the supremum over 1-Lipschitz functions f with f(0)=0 is also 1, attained by f(x)=−x.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The probability measures, compact interval, and base point are as in the Example.

[F2]

W1X is the infimum of the integral of the metric over Borel probability couplings with the prescribed marginals. The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein cost on a compact metric space

[F3]

The Dirac set function is a probability measure, and integrating a nonnegative measurable function against it evaluates that function at the point. The Dirac set function at a point A Dirac set function is a probability measure Integration against a Dirac measure evaluates at its point

[F4]

A real function is integrable when its positive and negative parts have finite nonnegative integrals, and its signed integral is the difference of those integrals. Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals

[F6]

A measure is countably additive on disjoint measurable sets; this implies monotonicity and finite subadditivity. Measures on sigma-algebras

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F3F5construct

By [F1], X=[0,1] is a compact metric space, so [F2] applies. The point (0,1) is Borel by [F5], and [F3] makes δ(0,1) a Borel probability measure. Its coordinate marginals are δ0 and δ1, so it is admissible; [F3] gives its cost as d(0,1)=1. Thus W1X(μ,ν)≤1.

1.2givenF3F4algebra

Let h be any feasible real-valued function, so it is 1-Lipschitz and hence continuous and Borel measurable. Its parts h+=max⁡{h,0} and h−=max⁡{−h,0} are nonnegative measurable functions by [F4]. Applying [F3] to each part, for c∈{0,1} we get ∫h+ dδc=h+(c)<∞ and ∫h− dδc=h−(c)<∞. Thus [F4] makes h integrable against both endpoint masses and gives ∫h dδc=h+(c)−h−(c)=h(c). In particular, f(x)=−x is feasible and has integrals f(0)=0 and f(1)=−1, so its objective is 1. Every feasible g has objective g(0)−g(1)≤∣g(0)−g(1)∣≤1, so the dual supremum is exactly 1.

2.1givenF2F3F5F6step 1.1algebra

For any admissible coupling γ, the marginal conditions give γ({0}×X)=1 and γ(X×{1})=1. The complement of their intersection has measure zero: each of the two complements is null, and finite subadditivity follows from the measure axioms [F6]. Their intersection is {(0,1)}. For any Borel E, if (0,1)∈E then γ(E)=1, while if (0,1)∉E then E lies in the null complement of that singleton, so γ(E)=0; hence γ=δ(0,1). Therefore every admissible cost is 1, and step 1.1 gives W1X(μ,ν)=1.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Steps 1.2 and 2.1 compute the primal and dual values as 1, proving the example's claimed equality.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality for masses on two separated points

Example

Let X={a,b} have the two-point metric d(a,b)=D>0, so X is compact. For p,q∈[0,1], set μ=pδa+(1−p)δb and ν=qδa+(1−q)δb. Then W1X(μ,ν)=D∣p−q∣, and the supremum over 1-Lipschitz functions normalized by f(a)=0 has the same value.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite metric space and probability measures are as in the Example.

[F2]

The Dirac set functions at a and b are probability measures; nonnegative finite linear combinations preserve countable additivity, and coefficients summing to one preserve total mass. Thus the displayed convex combinations have the stated atom masses and are probabilities. The Dirac set function at a point A Dirac set function is a probability measure Measures on sigma-algebras Probability measures and probability spaces

[F3]

W1X is the infimum of the integral of the metric over Borel probability couplings with the prescribed marginals. The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein cost on a compact metric space

[F4]

On a finite measurable space, a nonnegative simple function integrates as the finite sum of its values times the measures of its level sets; signed integrals are defined by positive and negative parts. The nonnegative Lebesgue integral Nonnegative simple measurable functions The integral of a nonnegative simple function The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals

[F5]

A measure is countably additive on disjoint measurable sets; this implies finite additivity and finite subadditivity. Measures on sigma-algebras

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F3F4F5algebra

By [F1], X×X consists of four Borel singletons. Given any admissible Borel coupling γ, define πuv:=γ({(u,v)}) for u,v∈{a,b}. Finite additivity [F5] makes π a nonnegative matrix with total sum 1; its row and column sums are the masses of the marginals, namely (p,1−p) and (q,1−q) by [F2]. Thus p−q=πab−πba. By [F4], its cost is D(πab+πba)≥D∣p−q∣, so [F3] gives W1X(μ,ν)≥D∣p−q∣.

1.2givenF1F2F4algebrachoose

Every real-valued function f on the finite discrete set is Borel measurable, and f+ and f− are nonnegative simple functions. For either λ=μ or λ=ν, apply the nonnegative finite-sum formula [F4] separately to f+ and f− to get ∫f± dλ=f±(a)λ({a})+f±(b)λ({b})<∞. Subtracting these two finite quantities by the signed-integral definition in [F4] proves ∫f dλ=f(a)λ({a})+f(b)λ({b}). Using the atom masses [F2], the objective for a feasible f with f(a)=0 is therefore (p−q)(f(a)−f(b)). Since ∣f(a)−f(b)∣≤D, the objective is at most D∣p−q∣. If p≥q, choose f(b)=−D; if p<q, choose f(b)=D. Each choice is feasible and attains D∣p−q∣, including p=q.

2.1givenF1F3F4F5step 1.1constructalgebra

If p≥q, the matrix (q,p−q,0,1−p) is nonnegative, has the required row sums (p,1−p) and column sums (q,1−q), and costs D(p−q). If p<q, the matrix (p,0,q−p,1−q) is nonnegative, has the same required marginals, and costs D(q−p). Either matrix defines a Borel probability on the four-point set by assigning each singleton its matrix entry; countable additivity follows because only finitely many disjoint subsets can be nonempty, and [F5] gives finite additivity. Its row and column sums give the required marginals, and [F4] gives its stated cost. Thus [F3] yields W1X(μ,ν)≤D∣p−q∣, and step 1.1 gives equality.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the primal value D∣p−q∣, and step 1.2 gives the same dual supremum, including p=q and endpoints p,q∈{0,1}.

Sources