How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality on compact metric spaces — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite-Sample Point Estimation
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality on compact metric spaces
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality for endpoint masses on a compact interval
Example
Let with the Euclidean metric, let and , where if and otherwise for each Borel set . For the base point , the coupling cost is , and the supremum over 1-Lipschitz functions with is also , attained by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The probability measures, compact interval, and base point are as in the Example.
The closed interval is compact in the Euclidean metric. Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
is the infimum of the integral of the metric over Borel probability couplings with the prescribed marginals. The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein cost on a compact metric space
The Dirac set function is a probability measure, and integrating a nonnegative measurable function against it evaluates that function at the point. The Dirac set function at a point A Dirac set function is a probability measure Integration against a Dirac measure evaluates at its point
A real function is integrable when its positive and negative parts have finite nonnegative integrals, and its signed integral is the difference of those integrals. Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
In a metric space each singleton is closed: for , the ball avoids . Coordinate projections are continuous in the product topology, so is closed and hence Borel in . Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
A measure is countably additive on disjoint measurable sets; this implies monotonicity and finite subadditivity. Measures on sigma-algebras
Verification
By [F1], is a compact metric space, so [F2] applies. The point is Borel by [F5], and [F3] makes a Borel probability measure. Its coordinate marginals are and , so it is admissible; [F3] gives its cost as . Thus .
Let be any feasible real-valued function, so it is 1-Lipschitz and hence continuous and Borel measurable. Its parts and are nonnegative measurable functions by [F4]. Applying [F3] to each part, for we get and . Thus [F4] makes integrable against both endpoint masses and gives . In particular, is feasible and has integrals and , so its objective is . Every feasible has objective , so the dual supremum is exactly .
For any admissible coupling , the marginal conditions give and . The complement of their intersection has measure zero: each of the two complements is null, and finite subadditivity follows from the measure axioms [F6]. Their intersection is . For any Borel , if then , while if then lies in the null complement of that singleton, so ; hence . Therefore every admissible cost is , and step 1.1 gives .
Steps 1.2 and 2.1 compute the primal and dual values as , proving the example's claimed equality.
Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality for masses on two separated points
Example
Let have the two-point metric , so is compact. For , set and . Then , and the supremum over 1-Lipschitz functions normalized by has the same value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite metric space and probability measures are as in the Example.
In a two-point metric space with , the balls and are open. Thus every subset of and every subset of is Borel, and is compact because any open cover has a subcover of at most two members. Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space
The Dirac set functions at and are probability measures; nonnegative finite linear combinations preserve countable additivity, and coefficients summing to one preserve total mass. Thus the displayed convex combinations have the stated atom masses and are probabilities. The Dirac set function at a point A Dirac set function is a probability measure Measures on sigma-algebras Probability measures and probability spaces
is the infimum of the integral of the metric over Borel probability couplings with the prescribed marginals. The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein cost on a compact metric space
On a finite measurable space, a nonnegative simple function integrates as the finite sum of its values times the measures of its level sets; signed integrals are defined by positive and negative parts. The nonnegative Lebesgue integral Nonnegative simple measurable functions The integral of a nonnegative simple function The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
A measure is countably additive on disjoint measurable sets; this implies finite additivity and finite subadditivity. Measures on sigma-algebras
Verification
By [F1], consists of four Borel singletons. Given any admissible Borel coupling , define for . Finite additivity [F5] makes a nonnegative matrix with total sum ; its row and column sums are the masses of the marginals, namely and by [F2]. Thus . By [F4], its cost is , so [F3] gives .
Every real-valued function on the finite discrete set is Borel measurable, and and are nonnegative simple functions. For either or , apply the nonnegative finite-sum formula [F4] separately to and to get . Subtracting these two finite quantities by the signed-integral definition in [F4] proves . Using the atom masses [F2], the objective for a feasible with is therefore . Since , the objective is at most . If , choose ; if , choose . Each choice is feasible and attains , including .
If , the matrix is nonnegative, has the required row sums and column sums , and costs . If , the matrix is nonnegative, has the same required marginals, and costs . Either matrix defines a Borel probability on the four-point set by assigning each singleton its matrix entry; countable additivity follows because only finitely many disjoint subsets can be nonempty, and [F5] gives finite additivity. Its row and column sums give the required marginals, and [F4] gives its stated cost. Thus [F3] yields , and step 1.1 gives equality.
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the primal value , and step 1.2 gives the same dual supremum, including and endpoints .