How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Clifford Theory over Normal Subgroups — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Clifford Theory over Normal Subgroups
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The calculation exhibits both possible inertia groups and a reducible normal restriction. Direct products make the extension and quotient parameter explicit. The endpoint calculations and distinguish isotypical restriction from irreducible restriction and verify the correspondence without proper-subgroup assumptions.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Clifford correspondence for A3 in S3
Example
Let , with , and . Write and . Then , with conjugacy orbits and and respective inertia groups and . The trivial orbit gives the trivial and sign characters of . Inducing gives the standard irreducible representation of degree two, with ramification one and reducible restriction .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the example. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.
Induction from inertia gives a bijection on irreducibles above a chosen normal type, and distinct normal-type orbits partition the irreducibles of the group. (Clifford correspondence).
Induction of an irreducible normal-subgroup character is irreducible precisely when its inertia group is the normal subgroup. (Normal subgroup induction criterion).
A fixed extension of a normal type to inertia parametrizes the irreducibles above it by tensoring with inflated irreducibles of the inertia quotient. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).
Verification
An operator representing satisfies and is diagonalizable, since has three distinct roots over . In an irreducible -module an eigenline is invariant under and hence under , so the module is that line. This gives precisely the three displayed characters. The relation interchanges and , while fixes every type. Thus their inertia is , while the trivial type has inertia .
The trivial character extends trivially to . The quotient is cyclic of order two. An irreducible representation of this quotient is an eigenline for its generator, with eigenvalue or , so its two characters inflate to the trivial and sign characters. Gallagher gives exactly these characters above the trivial normal type.
The inertia criterion makes irreducible. To identify it, let with the left permutation action. The vectors and form a basis of ; , , and , . Any invariant line would be one of the distinct -eigenlines, but swaps them, so is irreducible. Since it lies over and inertia equals , Clifford correspondence identifies it with the induced module.
The displayed eigenbasis gives , each once, so its ramification is one and its normal restriction is reducible and not isotypical. The two normal-type orbits exhaust all types; the orbit partition therefore shows that the trivial, sign, and standard modules are the complete list of irreducible -modules.
Gallagher correspondence for a direct product
Example
Let be finite groups, , and identify with . Fix afforded by . Then , and extends to . The irreducible -modules above are exactly, without repetitions, the modules for , where Their ramification indices are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the example. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.
Given an extension to inertia, tensoring it with inflated quotient irreducibles is a bijection above the type, with ramification equal to quotient degree. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).
Verification
For , conjugation sends to in the left-character convention. Characters are invariant under inner conjugation of by similarity of matrices, so every element fixes and inertia is . The map is multiplicative and restricts to the original action. The quotient map identifies with .
Gallagher applies to this extension. Its tensor with an inflated quotient module has exactly the displayed action, hence is . The bijection gives irreducibility, exhaustivity, and uniqueness of the parameter. Restricting to makes the second factor trivial and gives copies of , which is the ramification. When this is just ; when it is just .
Boundary normal subgroups in Clifford theory
Example
Let be any finite group. At , the sole normal type is and inertia is ; an irreducible character restricts to copies of this type, so . Clifford induction is identity on . At and , inertia is again , the lying-over set is the singleton , and ; the correspondence is the singleton identity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the example. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.
Induction from inertia is a bijection above a normal type, with inverse its isotypical component. (Clifford correspondence).
The ramification index is the multiplicity of the chosen normal type. (Clifford ramification index).
An extension to inertia parametrizes the irreducibles above the normal type by irreducibles of the inertia quotient. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).
Verification
For , the trivial group has just its one-dimensional trivial irreducible: every subspace is invariant, so a nonzero irreducible space has dimension one. Every -module restricts to its dimension many copies of this type. Conjugation fixes it, so , its isotypical component is the whole module, and induction from to itself is identity. The ramification is therefore .
The trivial normal type extends to the trivial representation of . Gallagher with sends to , recovering all of . A higher-degree irreducible thus has homogeneous but reducible restriction to .
For , characters are fixed by inner conjugation, so . The restriction of an irreducible to the same group is itself, hence it contains exactly when it equals , then with multiplicity one. Clifford correspondence is the singleton identity. The module affording extends to itself, and Gallagher has the trivial quotient , again giving only . If , these two endpoint descriptions agree and all degrees and indices are one.
Sources
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — §4.2 Theorem 4.2.4 / Proposition 4.2.3; Späth Theorem 1.3 specialized to S3
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — Theorem 1.3; tom Dieck Remark 4.2.5 specialized to a direct product
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — Theorems 1.1–1.3; tom Dieck Theorem 4.2.4 boundary specializations