Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Clifford Theory over Normal Subgroups — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The S3/A3 calculation exhibits both possible inertia groups and a reducible normal restriction. Direct products make the extension and quotient parameter explicit. The endpoint calculations N=1 and N=G distinguish isotypical restriction from irreducible restriction and verify the correspondence without proper-subgroup assumptions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Clifford correspondence for A3 in S3

Example

Let G=S3, N=A3=r with r=(123), and s=(23). Write ζ=e2πi/3 and λ(r)=ζ. Then Irr(N)={1,λ,λ1}, with conjugacy orbits {1} and {λ,λ1} and respective inertia groups G and N. The trivial orbit gives the trivial and sign characters of S3. Inducing λ gives the standard irreducible representation of degree two, with ramification one and reducible restriction λ+λ1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the example. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.

[F1]

Induction from inertia gives a bijection on irreducibles above a chosen normal type, and distinct normal-type orbits partition the irreducibles of the group. (Clifford correspondence).

[F2]

Induction of an irreducible normal-subgroup character is irreducible precisely when its inertia group is the normal subgroup. (Normal subgroup induction criterion).

[F3]

A fixed extension of a normal type to inertia parametrizes the irreducibles above it by tensoring with inflated irreducibles of the inertia quotient. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

An operator representing r satisfies r3=1 and is diagonalizable, since x31 has three distinct roots over C. In an irreducible N-module an eigenline is invariant under r and hence under N, so the module is that line. This gives precisely the three displayed characters. The relation srs1=r1 interchanges λ and λ1, while N fixes every type. Thus their inertia is N, while the trivial type has inertia G.

givenalgebra
2.1

The trivial character extends trivially to S3. The quotient S3/A3 is cyclic of order two. An irreducible representation of this quotient is an eigenline for its generator, with eigenvalue 1 or 1, so its two characters inflate to the trivial and sign characters. Gallagher gives exactly these characters above the trivial normal type.

F3step 1.1
2.2

The inertia criterion makes IndA3S3λ irreducible. To identify it, let P={(x1,x2,x3)C3:x1+x2+x3=0} with the left permutation action. The vectors v=(1,ζ2,ζ) and w=(1,ζ,ζ2) form a basis of P; rv=ζv, rw=ζ1w, and sv=w, sw=v. Any invariant line would be one of the distinct r-eigenlines, but s swaps them, so P is irreducible. Since it lies over λ and inertia equals N, Clifford correspondence identifies it with the induced module.

F1F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

The displayed eigenbasis gives PNλλ1, each once, so its ramification is one and its normal restriction is reducible and not isotypical. The two normal-type orbits exhaust all types; the orbit partition therefore shows that the trivial, sign, and standard modules are the complete list of irreducible S3-modules.

F1step 2.1step 2.2
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Gallagher correspondence for a direct product

Example

Let N,Q be finite groups, G=N×Q, and identify N with N×{1}. Fix θIrr(N) afforded by S. Then IG(θ)=G, and S~(n,q)=S(n) extends S to G. The irreducible G-modules above θ are exactly, without repetitions, the modules SU for UIrr(Q), where (n,q)(su)=(ns)(qu). Their ramification indices are dimU.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the example. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.

[F1]

Given an extension to inertia, tensoring it with inflated quotient irreducibles is a bijection above the type, with ramification equal to quotient degree. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For (a,b)N×Q, conjugation sends (n,1) to (a1na,1) in the left-character convention. Characters are invariant under inner conjugation of N by similarity of matrices, so every element fixes θ and inertia is G. The map (n,q)S(n) is multiplicative and restricts to the original action. The quotient map (n,q)q identifies G/N with Q.

givenalgebra
2.1

Gallagher applies to this extension. Its tensor with an inflated quotient module has exactly the displayed action, hence is SU. The bijection gives irreducibility, exhaustivity, and uniqueness of the parameter. Restricting to N makes the second factor trivial and gives dimU copies of S, which is the ramification. When Q=1 this is just S; when N=1 it is just U.

F1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Boundary normal subgroups in Clifford theory

Example

Let G be any finite group. At N=1, the sole normal type is θ=1 and inertia is G; an irreducible character χ restricts to χ(1) copies of this type, so e(χ,1)=χ(1). Clifford induction is identity on Irr(G). At N=G and θIrr(G), inertia is again G, the lying-over set is the singleton {θ}, and e(θ,θ)=1; the correspondence is the singleton identity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the example. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.

[F1]

Induction from inertia is a bijection above a normal type, with inverse its isotypical component. (Clifford correspondence).

[F2]

The ramification index is the multiplicity of the chosen normal type. (Clifford ramification index).

[F3]

An extension to inertia parametrizes the irreducibles above the normal type by irreducibles of the inertia quotient. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For N=1, the trivial group has just its one-dimensional trivial irreducible: every subspace is invariant, so a nonzero irreducible space has dimension one. Every G-module restricts to its dimension many copies of this type. Conjugation fixes it, so I=G, its isotypical component is the whole module, and induction from G to itself is identity. The ramification is therefore χ(1).

F1F2given
2.1

The trivial normal type extends to the trivial representation of G. Gallagher with G/1=G sends η to 1η=η, recovering all of Irr(G). A higher-degree irreducible thus has homogeneous but reducible restriction to 1.

F3step 1.1
3.1

For N=G, characters are fixed by inner conjugation, so I=G. The restriction of an irreducible to the same group is itself, hence it contains θ exactly when it equals θ, then with multiplicity one. Clifford correspondence is the singleton identity. The module affording θ extends to itself, and Gallagher has the trivial quotient G/G, again giving only θ. If G=1, these two endpoint descriptions agree and all degrees and indices are one.

F1F2F3given

Sources