Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Energy identity and displacement for Euclidean gradient trajectories

Statement

Let m≥1 be an integer, let a,b∈R with a<b, let U⊆Rm be open and f∈C1(U), and let x:[a,b]→U be a C1 solution of x′=−∇f(x) on (a,b). Here C1 on [a,b] means that x is continuous on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), and its derivative has a continuous extension to [a,b], also denoted x′. The gradient is the Euclidean vector of partial derivatives. Then f(x(b))−f(x(a))=−∫ab∥∇f(x(t))∥2 dt, and ∥x(b)−x(a)∥≤∫ab∥x′(t)∥ dt. We call this last integral the length on [a,b].

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The C1 hypothesis on the open-domain map f uses Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms. The vector derivative and the componentwise vector integral use The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral; the closed-interval C1 convention is specified in the Statement.

[F3]

A continuous real function on a real interval with a<b is Riemann integrable by A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion. Newton–Leibniz Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative requires continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and an integrable extension of the interior derivative; it requires no endpoint derivative.

[F4]

For an integrable vector function on [a,b] with a<b, For a ≤ b and f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ integrable when a<b, ‖∫ₐᵇ f‖₂ ≤ ∫ₐᵇ ‖ f‖₂; for a<b, ‖ f‖₂ is integrable gives integrability of its Euclidean norm and bounds the norm of its integral by the integral of its norm.

[F5]

Total differentiability at a point implies continuity there by Total differentiability gives a local O(‖h‖₂) increment bound and therefore continuity.

[F6]

Clause 1 of Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous makes composites of continuous maps continuous, including maps between Euclidean subspaces with their inherited topologies.

[F7]

For maps from a metric subspace to Rm with m≥1, clause 1 of A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions identifies continuity with continuity of every component; clause 3 preserves scalar multiples and inner products.

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the energy identity and the displacement bound.

1.1F1F2given

At every t∈(a,b) the chain rule and gradient representation give (f∘x)′(t)=⟨∇f(x(t)),x′(t)⟩=−∥∇f(x(t))∥2.

1.2F1F5F6F7given

The C1 hypothesis makes f totally differentiable at every point of U, hence continuous there. It also makes the entries of its derivative matrix continuous; these are the components of ∇f, so the gradient is continuous by componentwise continuity. Composing with the continuous curve x shows that f∘x and ∇f∘x are continuous on [a,b]. Scalar multiplication also makes −f∘x continuous. Both x and the stipulated continuous extension x′ have continuous components on [a,b].

2.1F3F7step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The real function t↦∥∇f(x(t))∥2=⟨∇f(x(t)),∇f(x(t))⟩ is continuous by the inner-product clause of [F7], hence integrable. Newton–Leibniz applied to −f∘x and this integrable extension of its interior derivative gives f(x(a))−f(x(b))=∫ab∥∇f(x(t))∥2 dt, which is the asserted energy identity. Applying the same argument on any nondegenerate closed subinterval gives a nonpositive energy increment, since the integrand is nonnegative; thus energy is nonincreasing.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.2∎

Each component of the continuous extension x′ is integrable on [a,b]. By the vector-derivative definition, its interior values are the derivatives of the corresponding components of x. Each component of x is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), so Newton–Leibniz with that component of x′ as the integrable extension applies. Reassembling the resulting scalar identities by the componentwise vector-integral definition gives x(b)−x(a)=∫abx′(t) dt. The vector-integral norm inequality now yields ∥x(b)−x(a)∥≤∫ab∥x′(t)∥ dt, including integrability of the speed.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.