How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A large degree with explicitly bounded probability at fixed sparse density
Statement
For every integer , put and . In , with probability at least , some vertex has at least neighbors. In fact some vertex in the first half has exactly neighbors in the second half with probability at least .
Facts & Assumptions
The degrees from distinct vertices in one half into the other half are independent (Independent degrees into a fixed half of a random graph).
For even each such degree equals with probability at least (An explicit lower bound on a sparse binomial atom).
The model is a finite simple graph on the labelled vertices with mutually independent Bernoulli edge indicators (The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p)). For even , the first half is and the second half is .
Distinct vertices are neighbors precisely when their unordered pair is an edge, and a vertex's total degree is the number of all its neighbors (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).
Mathematical induction holds for properties of nonnegative integers: a property true at and preserved from to holds for every (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the asserted conclusions.
The integer is even and satisfies (since and ). Let and let be the common probability of degree into the second half. By [F1] the probability none of the first-half vertices has this degree is . By [F2], .
Fix . Since and , we have . For a nonnegative integer , the inequality holds at . If it holds at , multiplication by gives . Thus [F5] proves it for every nonnegative integer , in particular . Taking positive reciprocals gives . If the probability of no such vertex is zero. The complementary event therefore has probability at least . A vertex's total degree is no smaller than its degree into the second half, proving both assertions.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.