How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An explicit lower bound on a sparse binomial atom
Statement
Let be an integer and let be even. Fix a partition into two sets of size and a vertex . For , let have the law of , the number of neighbors of in . Then The bound is uniform in all these , partitions and vertices.
Facts & Assumptions
In the stated cross-degree setting, and , so the degree has probability of equaling (Independent degrees into a fixed half of a random graph).
The factorial is the product , with (The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ).
The number counts the -element subsets of any -element set (The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient C(n, k) := | [n]ᵏ|).
The model is the finite simple graph on the labelled vertex set with mutually independent Bernoulli edge indicators (The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p)).
The open neighborhood is , so counts the neighbors of in (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).
A real random variable on a finite probability space is a real-valued function on its outcome set. Its law assigns to each value the probability of the corresponding fibre, so variables with the same law have the same atom probabilities (Real random variables on finite probability spaces and their finite distributions).
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the asserted conclusions.
Put . For a set of elements, let count its ordered -tuples of distinct elements. There is one empty tuple, so . For , partition the ordered -tuples by their first entries: each of the parts has exactly elements, one for each unused element. Therefore . Induction gives for . Taking and using [F2] proves that each -element set has exactly orderings.
Forgetting the order partitions the ordered -tuples from an -element set into classes by [F3], each of size by step 1.1. Thus . Since , we have , and for each factor is at least . Dividing by the positive number gives .
For integers and , induction gives : the inductive multiplication adds the nonnegative term . Apply this with and . The resulting lower bound is at least . Multiplying it by step 2.1 and using [F1] proves .
Depends on
- Independent degrees into a fixed half of a random graph
- The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ
- The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient C(n, k) := | [n]ᵏ|
- The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p)
- Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree
- Real random variables on finite probability spaces and their finite distributions
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.