How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary estimates used for degree expectations
PDF p. 37: Proof of Proposition 6.9, binomial and factorial estimates
Statement
For every real , . For integers and , , with even when . For every positive integer , .
Here counts the -element subsets of an -element set, with , and , where .
Facts & Assumptions
For every real , (1+x≤exp(x) for every real x, hence (1-p)ᵐ≤exp(-mp)).
For integers and any , the elementary binomial envelope includes and (Elementary binomial probability envelopes).
The binomial coefficient counts subsets and for every integer (The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient C(n, k) := | [n]ᵏ|). The factorial has and is the product of the positive integers through its index (The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ). The real exponential notation and are as in The real exponential function and the number e by a power series.
Proof
Given: A real , integers and , and a positive integer wherever the factorial lower bound is asserted.
Goal: Establish the three stated inequalities, including the case in the binomial bound.
Apply [F1] with . This gives .
If , choose and apply [F2] with to obtain . If , [F3] gives and , while the stated zeroth-power convention gives ; hence the same inequality is equality, including at .
For any positive integer , apply [F2] with and . Its factorial conclusion gives . Together with steps 1.1 and 1.2 this proves all three estimates.
Source notes
The cited article uses these estimates in the proof of Proposition 6.9 to bound degree expectations; the argument above derives them from the stated mathematical suppliers. In that application the exponential inequality is used with the edge probability .
Depends on
- Elementary binomial probability envelopes
- The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient C(n, k) := | [n]ᵏ|
- The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ
- The real exponential function and the number e by a power series
- 1+x≤exp(x) for every real x, hence (1-p)ᵐ≤exp(-mp)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing — Abdalla, Bandeira, Kassabov, Souza, Strogatz, Townsend (2026) · PDF p. 37, proof of Proposition 6.9, binomial and factorial estimates