Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary binomial probability envelopes

Statement

Let N≥k≥1 be integers and 0<p<1. A Bin⁡(N,p) count is the sum of N mutually independent Bernoulli real random variables on a common probability space (Ω,F,P), each equal to 1 with probability p and 0 otherwise. Then

P(Bin⁡(N,p)=k)≤(Np)ke−p(N−k)k!≤exp⁡{klog⁡(Np/k)+k−p(N−k)}.

Here k!=1⋅2⋯k, e=exp⁡(1), and log⁡ is the inverse of the real exponential. In particular k!≥(k/e)k, (Nk)≤Nk/k!, and 1−p≤e−p. Separately, for N≥0 and 0<p<1, P(Bin⁡(N,p)=0)=(1−p)N≤e−Np; no logarithm of zero is used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

For 0≤k≤N, (Nk)k!=N(N−1)⋯(N−k+1), with the empty product equal to 1; factorials are positive and 0!=1 (C(n, k) k! (n-k)! = n! for k ≤ n; hence C(n, k) k! = n^k̲, the quotient n!/(k!(n-k)!) is a natural number, and C(n, k) = C(n, n-k), The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ).

[F3]

On (0,∞), log⁡ is continuously differentiable with derivative 1/x, is strictly increasing, and takes products to sums, with log⁡1=0 (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[F4]

A continuous function bounded above by M on [a,b] has integral at most M(b−a); the fundamental theorem evaluates the integral of a continuously differentiable function's derivative, and the product rule differentiates products (If m ≤ f ≤ M on [a,b] then m(b-a) ≤ L(f,P) ≤ ∫ₐᵇ f ≤ ∫ₐᵇ f ≤ U(f,P) ≤ M(b-a) for every partition P; in particular every constant function is integrable, with ∫ₐᵇ c = c(b-a), The fundamental theorem of calculus and integration by parts, Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients).

[F5]

The real exponential is strictly increasing, log⁡ is its inverse, e=exp⁡(1), and exp⁡(u+v)=exp⁡(u)exp⁡(v) (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The real exponential function and the number e by a power series, The exponential function is strictly increasing, The exponential addition formula exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y)).

[F6]

If 0≤p≤1 and m is a nonnegative integer, then (1−p)m≤exp⁡(−mp); also 1+x≤exp⁡(x) for every real x (1+x≤exp(x) for every real x, hence (1-p)ᵐ≤exp(-mp)).

Proof

Given: Integers N≥k≥1 and 0<p<1; for the final case, an integer N≥0 and k=0.

Goal: Prove both positive-count bounds, their stated elementary ingredients, and the zero-count bound.

1.1F3F4algebra

For each integer j≥1, [F3] gives log⁡t≤log⁡(j+1) on [j,j+1]. By [F4], ∫jj+1log⁡t dt≤log⁡(j+1). The product rule and [F3] show that tlog⁡t−t is a continuously differentiable antiderivative of log⁡t on (0,∞), so the same integral equals (j+1)log⁡(j+1)−(j+1)−jlog⁡j+j.

1.2F1F2F6algebra

Each of the k positive factors in the falling factorial in [F2] is at most N, so (Nk)≤Nk/k!. With m=N−k, [F6] gives (1−p)N−k≤e−p(N−k) and, at x=−p, 1−p≤e−p. Substituting these bounds into [F1] proves the first displayed inequality.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F5algebra

Sum the inequalities of step 1.1 for j=1,…,k−1. The left sides telescope to klog⁡k−k+1, and the right side is ∑i=2klog⁡i=log⁡(k!) by [F2] and [F3]. For k=1 the same inequality holds directly. Thus log⁡(k!)≥klog⁡k−k. Applying the increasing exponential and [F5] yields k!≥(k/e)k.

3.1step 2.1F5algebra

By step 2.1 and positivity, 1/k!≤(e/k)k. Multiplying by the nonnegative remaining factors and using the logarithm inverse and exponential addition laws in [F5] gives (Np)ke−p(N−k)k!≤exp⁡{klog⁡(Np/k)+k−p(N−k)}.

4.1F1F6algebra∎

For k=0, [F1] and the boundary value (N0)=1 give probability (1−p)N; [F6] bounds it by e−Np. This also holds for N=0, when both sides equal 1. The stated bounds follow.

Remarks

The displayed inequalities are finite bounds. Any later asymptotic replacement of N=n−1 or of an integer k by a real threshold requires its own explicit error estimate.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.