Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chernoff bounds with the exact degree mean

Statement

Let n≥2 be an integer and p∈[0,1]. In G(n,p), the simple graph on [n]={1,…,n} whose possible edges occur independently with probability p, let d(v) be the number of edges incident to v and put μ=(n−1)p. For 0≤δ≤1, P(∃v:∣d(v)−μ∣≥δμ)≤2nexp⁡(−μδ2/3). No independence between different vertex degrees is required. If 1/n≤ε≤1, then the estimate centered at pn is P(∃v:∣d(v)−pn∣≥εpn)≤2nexp⁡(−p(nε−1)23(n−1)). In particular, for fixed 0<ε≤1 and p=γlog⁡n/n∈[0,1], if γ≥γ0>3/ε2, the latter probability tends to zero uniformly over such γ as n→∞. The same conclusion holds when γ→∞, subject to p≤1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The graph and parameters in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the exact-mean and translated simultaneous degree bounds and the stated logarithmic-density consequence.

[F1]

Each d(v) is the sum of the n−1 mutually independent Bernoulli(p) indicators of the possible edges incident to v. (Single-vertex degree laws and the shared-edge dependence)

[F2]

For a finite sum of independent Bernoulli variables with mean μ, the two-sided deviation probability at δμ is at most 2exp⁡(−μδ2/3) when 0≤δ≤1, including μ=0. (Chernoff bound for independent bernoulli trials)

[F3]

The probability of a finite union of events is at most the sum of their probabilities; independence of the events is unnecessary. (The finite union bound)

Proof

technique · Apply the single-vertex tail bound and then the finite union bound; translate the center before selecting the deviation parameter
1.1F1F2F3

For each vertex, [F1] gives a sum to which [F2] applies with mean (n−1)p=μ. Thus its probability of deviation at least δμ is at most 2exp⁡(−μδ2/3). Applying [F3] to the n vertex events proves the first displayed inequality, regardless of dependence among degrees.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Since pn−μ=p, the triangle inequality gives ∣d(v)−μ∣≥∣d(v)−pn∣−p. If 1/n≤ε≤1, put δ=(nε−1)/(n−1); then 0≤δ≤1 and δμ=εpn−p. Hence every event ∣d(v)−pn∣≥εpn is contained in ∣d(v)−μ∣≥δμ. The first bound therefore gives the second, including p=0.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

For fixed 0<ε≤1, the restriction 1/n≤ε holds for all sufficiently large n. Substituting p=γlog⁡n/n in the second bound yields 2n1−γan, where an=(nε−1)2/(3n(n−1))→ε2/3. If γ≥γ0>3/ε2, choose c>1 with γ0an≥c for all sufficiently large n; the probability is then at most 2n1−c uniformly in γ. A sequence with γ→∞ eventually exceeds such a fixed γ0, so the same conclusion follows whenever the specified p is a probability.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.