How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chernoff bounds with the exact degree mean
Statement
Let be an integer and . In , the simple graph on whose possible edges occur independently with probability , let be the number of edges incident to and put . For , No independence between different vertex degrees is required. If , then the estimate centered at is In particular, for fixed and , if , the latter probability tends to zero uniformly over such as . The same conclusion holds when , subject to .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graph and parameters in the Statement.
Goal: Prove the exact-mean and translated simultaneous degree bounds and the stated logarithmic-density consequence.
Each is the sum of the mutually independent Bernoulli indicators of the possible edges incident to . (Single-vertex degree laws and the shared-edge dependence)
For a finite sum of independent Bernoulli variables with mean , the two-sided deviation probability at is at most when , including . (Chernoff bound for independent bernoulli trials)
The probability of a finite union of events is at most the sum of their probabilities; independence of the events is unnecessary. (The finite union bound)
Proof
For each vertex, [F1] gives a sum to which [F2] applies with mean . Thus its probability of deviation at least is at most . Applying [F3] to the vertex events proves the first displayed inequality, regardless of dependence among degrees.
Since , the triangle inequality gives . If , put ; then and . Hence every event is contained in . The first bound therefore gives the second, including .
For fixed , the restriction holds for all sufficiently large . Substituting in the second bound yields , where . If , choose with for all sufficiently large ; the probability is then at most uniformly in . A sequence with eventually exceeds such a fixed , so the same conclusion follows whenever the specified is a probability.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.