How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Single-vertex degree laws and the shared-edge dependence
Statement
Let and , and let be the simple graph on whose possible edges occur independently with probability . Write for the indicator that the edge occurs, and define the degree . Then has law for every vertex .
For distinct vertices , put and . The variables are mutually independent, while and share the same edge indicator. Consequently . Identically distributed degrees need not be independent; a count of vertices of a given degree is not in general binomial.
Statement references
The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p)
A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials
Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables
Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and the graph and edge indicators in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the degree law, the independence of the three displayed terms, their covariance, and the qualification about degree counts.
The graph has one mutually independent Bernoulli indicator for each unordered pair of distinct vertices; a simple graph has no loops. (The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p), A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets)
A sum of mutually independent Bernoulli variables has the binomial law, including the empty sum when . (Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials)
Mutual independence means that joint probabilities of specified values factor over any subfamily. (Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables)
Covariance is the expectation of the product of centered variables and is bilinear on finite linear combinations; independent square-integrable variables have zero covariance. (Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space, Variance and covariance identities for random variables, Independence forces covariance to vanish)
A Bernoulli variable has variance . (A Bernoulli(p) variable has mean p and variance p(1-p); a binomial(n,p) variable has mean np and variance np(1-p))
Proof
For a fixed , its possible incident edges are precisely the distinct pairs with . Their indicators are mutually independent Bernoulli variables, so their sum is binomial, also when .
For distinct , the edge-index sets used by , and are pairwise disjoint. For prescribed values of the three variables, sum the joint probabilities over the edge-indicator configurations giving those values. The factorization in [F3] makes each configuration probability a product over the three disjoint blocks; the finite sum consequently factors into the three marginal probabilities. Thus the three variables are mutually independent. This includes , when both residual sums are constant zero. The displayed degree decompositions follow by separating the edge from each incident-edge sum.
All variables are bounded. Bilinearity and the zero covariance of independent variables give . For this is nonzero, so the two degrees are not independent.
For and , the number of vertices of degree one is : it is zero with probability and two with probability . A binomial law with two trials and success probability assigns probability to one, and no other binomial law can have exactly this nondegenerate support . Hence even though the degrees have the same marginal law, their degree count need not be binomial.
Depends on
- The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p)
- A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
- Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials
- Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables
- A Bernoulli(p) variable has mean p and variance p(1-p); a binomial(n,p) variable has mean np and variance np(1-p)
- Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space
- Variance and covariance identities for random variables
- Independence forces covariance to vanish
Used by · 11
- Chernoff bounds with the exact degree mean
- Extremal degrees at a fixed logarithmic mean
- Earlier thresholds with explicit source quantifiers and a fixed-scale deduction
- Binomial approximation for vertex degree counts
- Lower degree-tail count estimate — Lemma 6.7
- Upper degree-tail count estimate — Lemma 6.8
- Chernoff degree concentration used in Section 6
- Simultaneous degree deviations on the squared logarithmic scale
- A rare logarithmic degree occurs with probability of its first-moment order
- Slack entropy thresholds preserve the quantitative synchronization bound
- A positive minimum degree envelope at every fixed supercritical ratio
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.