Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Marked waiting law from finite no-jump evolution

Statement

Use the finite matrices, Q,B,Vt,St and sσ of the no-jump survival lemma, and assume AC. Write d≥1 for the system dimension and M={1,…,m} for the finite mark set, possibly empty. Give the density-matrix space Dd={σ∈Md(C):σ≥0, Tr⁡σ=1} its Euclidean subspace topology and Borel sigma-algebra. Time intervals have their Borel sigma-algebras, M has the discrete sigma-algebra, and products have the product sigma-algebra. The outcome space is the disjoint union E=((0,∞)×M)⊔{+∞}. Its sigma-algebra E consists of sets A⊆E whose sections Aa={u>0:(u,a)∈A} are Borel for every a∈M, with the isolated no-event outcome +∞ independently included or excluded. Let λ be Lebesgue measure restricted to the Borel sets of (0,∞).

Define fσ,a(u)=Tr⁡(LaSu(σ)La†) and sσ(∞)=lim⁡t→∞sσ(t). The marked next-event law is the probability kernel from Dd to (E,E) given by K(σ,A)=∑a∈M∫Aafσ,a(u) dλ(u)+1A(+∞)sσ(∞). Its survivor at finite u≥0, including the no-event outcome, is K(σ,((u,∞)×M)⊔{+∞})=sσ(u). Given survival to u, its no-event state is σ^(u)=Su(σ)/sσ(u) and its marked hazard is hσ,a(u)=fσ,a(u)/sσ(u)=Tr⁡(La†Laσ^(u)). After an event of positive density with mark a, its state is J(σ,u,a)=LaSu(σ)La†/fσ,a(u). Set J(σ,u,a)=I/d at zero-density events; this does not change the law. The no-event state map on Dd×[0,∞), the hazard maps, and J on Dd×(0,∞)×M are Borel measurable, with state outputs in Dd. In particular, their state-valued maps define measurable Dirac probability kernels into Dd.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The no-jump maps are positive, have strictly positive survival, and satisfy the survival derivative identity. Finite no-jump propagator and survival identity

[F2]

The fundamental theorem integrates the continuous survival derivative on every finite interval. Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves

[F3]

Assume AC, including Countable Choice for the integration interface. The Axiom of Choice

[F4]

Borel sigma-algebras are generated by open sets, and product sigma-algebras by measurable rectangles. The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates

[F5]

A probability measure has total mass one. A probability kernel has a probability measure at each input and measurable evaluation at every output event. Probability measures and probability spaces Measure kernel and probability kernel

[F6]

Under Countable Choice, Lebesgue measure is a measure extending interval length. A nonnegative measurable density defines a measure by integration over events. Assuming countable choice, L(ℝⁿ) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λₙ is a complete measure extending elementary volume The measure with density f relative to μ

[F7]

Increasing limits of nonnegative measurable functions pass through their integrals on any measure space. Monotone convergence for the integral

[F8]

Integrating a nonnegative product-measurable function against a finite kernel gives a measurable function of the input. Measurability of integration against a kernel

Proof

Given: The finite no-jump data, AC and the measurable spaces in the statement.

Goal: Construct the normalized marked waiting kernel and establish the survivor, state, hazard and measurability assertions.

1.1givenF1F2F3F5F6F7algebra

Each fσ,a(u) is jointly continuous in (σ,u) and nonnegative. For fixed σ the density measures of [F6] on the marked components, together with the nonnegative atom at +∞, define a measure on (E,E). Indeed, ∑afσ,a(u)=Tr⁡(QSu(σ))=−sσ′(u), so ∑a∫0tfσ,a(u) du=1−sσ(t). The decreasing nonnegative survivor has a limit at infinity; [F7] applied to the densities restricted to (0,n] gives total finite-event mass 1−sσ(∞). Adding the atom normalizes the measure to one. If M is empty, the derivative identity gives sσ(t)=1 and all mass is at +∞.

2.1F1F6step 1.1algebra

Subtracting the finite-event mass up to u from one gives survivor sσ(u), since individual finite times have zero density-measure mass. Division by this strictly positive survivor gives the displayed marked hazard. The positive no-event matrix normalized by its trace is a density matrix, as is the positive post-event matrix whenever its trace fσ,a(u) is positive. Thus the stated conditional-state and hazard formulas hold with no exceptional finite survival times.

2.2F1F4F5F6F7F8step 1.1algebraconstruct

Fix A∈E and put gA(σ,u)=∑a∈M1Aa(u)fσ,a(u). The spaces Dd and (0,∞) have countable bases inherited from Euclidean spaces, so each open subset of their product is a countable union of basic open rectangles. Consequently the jointly continuous densities are measurable for the product sigma-algebra, and so is the nonnegative gA. For every integer n≥1, Cn(σ,C)=λ(C∩(0,n]) is a finite kernel from Dd to (0,∞): its section is a measure of total mass n and each evaluation is constant in σ. By [F8], Gn(σ)=∫gA(σ,u) Cn(σ,du) is Borel measurable. By [F7], Gn↑G, where G(σ)=∑a∫Aafσ,a dλ. For every real c, {G>c}=⋃n{Gn>c}, so G is measurable. Also sσ(∞)=inf⁡n≥1sσ(n) and {σ:sσ(∞)<c}=⋃n{σ:sσ(n)<c}, a Borel set since every sσ(n) is continuous in σ. Hence the infinity mass is measurable. Their sum K(σ,A) is measurable for every A∈E; together with step 1.1 this is exactly the probability-kernel property.

3.1F1F4F5F6step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Matrix multiplication, exponentiation and trace are continuous, and sσ(u)>0 everywhere on Dd×[0,∞). Thus the no-event state and marked hazards are continuous. For each mark the set {(σ,u):fσ,a(u)>0} is open, and J is continuous there and constant on its Borel complement. Hence J is Borel measurable into Dd with its subspace Borel sigma-algebra. For any one of these state maps F and any Borel B⊆Dd, the Dirac-kernel evaluation is δF(x)(B)=1B(F(x)), which is measurable, and each Dirac measure has mass one. Finally the zero-density event set has probability ∑a∫{u:fσ,a(u)=0}fσ,a(u) dλ(u)=0 for every σ; assigning I/d there leaves the law unchanged. All formulas specify the maps simultaneously, without selecting separate conditional versions.

Source notes

Plenio–Knight, Section IV.C, Eqs. (122), (124)–(128), is retained as contextual bibliography for the no-jump/jump split. No general existence or measurability theorem is imported from it. This item supplies a local argument from the declared mathematical suppliers.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources