How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiple decays vanish over fixed total time with fast checks
PDF p. 14: Opening paragraph of S4; PDF p. 16: Final S4 paragraph
Statement
Adopt the finite lifted model, its physical and spectral hypotheses, and the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Its finite physical space is the orthogonal sum of angular-momentum blocks , with ; is the specified downward jump-rate scale. Use the exact monitored quantum-jump record of its finite GKSL evolution. A jump is one event in that record, and an interval has a multiple-decay event if it contains at least two jumps.
Let , let be a positive integer, and set . At the end of each interval perform the ideal two-projector check of a fixed excited host block , and, after a detected outcome, apply a supplied recovery that returns the state to that host block before the next interval. Start in that block. The recovery may depend on the earlier record; it is assumed instantaneous for this cycle model. Let be the number of detected outcomes. Then each interval has multiple-decay probability at most , even conditional on its preceding history, and the probability that any of the intervals contains multiple decays is at most . Consequently that probability tends to zero as along .
Furthermore , independently of . Thus increasing the checking frequency does not by itself increase the expected number of detected decay outcomes without bound. This is an upper bound governed by the model's physical rate; it does not assert an exact count or a Poisson distribution. The statement concerns multiple-decay probability, not an unspecified error metric or a complete proof of recovery fidelity.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The finite lifted model specifies a diagonal Hamiltonian and three downward jump matrices , , together with finite GKSL evolution and the stated inherited hypotheses. General bounded diagonal lift for fast-checking analysis
For these jumps, , where projects onto block ; each jump maps block into block and annihilates the ground block. Normalized jumps give a scalar total decay operator General bounded diagonal lift for fast-checking analysis
The ideal syndrome instrument measures and after the interval; a suitable recovery is an additional input, not something constructed by the check. Projective code-manifold syndrome check
For a finite GKSL jump instrument, supplies a history-uniform hazard bound for every conditional state. Under that bound, the probability of at least two jumps in an interval of length is at most , and the probability of such an interval among intervals is at most , including when allowed resets change the interval's initial state. Two-jump probability from a bounded hazard
A conditional waiting law with hazard has no-jump survival under its stated measurable-law hypotheses. Inter-event survival and density from a conditional intensity
For the finite matrices in [F1], put and . The no-jump map is , with for every density matrix and finite . The exact record instrument identifies the conditional state on a zero-event interval of length as ; its record average is the specified GKSL channel. These interfaces assume AC, already included in [A1]. Finite no-jump propagator and survival identity Jump-record instruments and conditional intensity
On any probability space, expectation is integration against its probability measure. For every measurable event , ; in particular its indicator is integrable since and . Expectation is linear for two integrable random variables and monotone for almost-sure order between real integrable random variables. Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable The expectation of an indicator is the probability of the event Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
For an integrable real random variable and sub-sigma-algebra , a conditional-expectation version is -measurable and integrable, with for every . In particular the equality for gives . Here the conditional probabilities come from the supplied record and check laws, rather than an existence assertion based only on a displayed hazard. Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra
Assume the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, together with the lifted model's physical and spectral hypotheses. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω) The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an ℕ-indexed chain General bounded diagonal lift for fast-checking analysis
Proof
Given: The finite lifted model, the initial host-block state, the ideal checks and host-block-returning recoveries, with as in the Statement.
Goal: Bound multiple-decay events and the expected number of detected outcomes over the fixed total time.
The mutually orthogonal block projectors in [F2] sum to the identity. Hence . In particular, for every positive trace-one conditional state , including any state produced by a measurement or recovery, . The bound therefore holds throughout every interval, not merely at its start or for a stationary state.
The initial state of each interval is supported in the host block: this holds initially, after a detected outcome by the assumed recovery, and after a null outcome by the projector in [F3]. Write and let be that initial state. Since and are diagonal in the block basis, and . Hence commutes with and its diagonal exponential . It follows that , where is the exact no-jump map in [F6]. Its strictly positive trace permits normalization, so the zero-event conditional state is still supported in . Therefore , and [F3] gives zero detection probability conditional on no events. Thus, if no jump occurs in an interval, the outcome cannot occur. A detected outcome therefore implies at least one jump in that interval; the converse is not needed for the bound.
Let be the measurable event that check detects a decay, put , and let be the preceding full-history sigma-algebra. Then . By [F7], ; since , each indicator is integrable. The same indicator identity for the whole probability space makes the constant one integrable with expectation one. These statements apply on the full record probability space, regardless of whether it has finitely many outcomes.
Apply [F4] with . The per-interval conditional bound is , and summing over the intervals bounds the probability of at least one multiple-decay interval by . This tends to zero for fixed and as . No independence of intervals or Poisson assumption is needed.
Conditional on the preceding history, [F5] and the hazard bound give a probability of at least one jump no greater than . By step 1.2 the same upper bound applies to a detection. The actual conditional detection law supplies a version in the sense of [F8], with almost surely. Taking the whole probability space as the event in [F8] gives ; monotonicity and scalar linearity in [F7] therefore give . Finite iteration of the two-variable linearity in [F7], starting from the integrable indicators in step 1.3, makes every partial sum integrable and yields . This proves the stated rate-controlled bound without asserting that every jump is detected or that recovery is exact on logical information.
Source notes
The article's fixed-time multiple-decay and detected-event claims are attributed above. The proof uses the completed finite-model and bounded-hazard suppliers; the article is not used as a proof of its own claim. The expectation bound makes the rate-controlled statement precise under the stated cycle assumptions.
Depends on
- Finite no-jump propagator and survival identity
- Jump-record instruments and conditional intensity
- General bounded diagonal lift for fast-checking analysis
- Projective code-manifold syndrome check
- Normalized jumps give a scalar total decay operator
- Two-jump probability from a bounded hazard
- Inter-event survival and density from a conditional intensity
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an ℕ-indexed chain
- Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable
- The expectation of an indicator is the probability of the event
- Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
- Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Monolithic Quantum Error Correction in the Presence of Distinguishability · PDF page 14, opening paragraph of Section S4; page 16, final paragraph of Section S4