Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restriction quotient and Bochner interpolation for the exterior extension

Statement

Assume AC, 1<q<∞, 0<s<1, 0<T<∞ and 1≤p<∞. Let X0=Lq(Ω) and X1=W1,q(Ω) for a smooth exterior domain, and let E be the single extension in A single collar-reflection and free-tail exterior extension. Put Xs=[X0,X1]s and Hs,q(Rn)={f∈S′:F−1((1+4π2∣ξ∣2)s/2f^)∈Lq}. Then Xs equals the restriction quotient PHs,q(Rn) with equivalent norms. Its quotient kernel is closed and the quotient is Banach. Moreover [Lp(0,T;X0),Lp(0,T;X1)]s=Lp(0,T;Xs) with the Bochner convention of strongly measurable almost-everywhere classes. The pointwise maps E and P are well-defined bounded maps on the corresponding Bochner endpoint and interpolated spaces, and PE=I there.

External input

Reference 0, Definition 3.1 (PDF p.15), defines Λz=F−1(1+4π2∣ξ∣2)−z/2F. Remark 3.2 (PDF pp.15–16) states that this is a well-defined linear map on tempered distributions: the multiplier is smooth with polynomially bounded derivatives, and the Fourier transform and its inverse act on S′. Definition 3.3 and Theorem 3.7 (PDF pp.16–17) give Hs,q(Rn)={f:Λ−sf∈Lq}=[Lq,W1,q]s with equivalent norms when 1<q<∞, 0<s<1. Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11, gives [Lp0(X0),Lp1(X1)]s=Lp([X0,X1]s) for finite endpoint exponents with 1/p=(1−s)/p0+s/p1. Only the equal exponent case p0=p1=p is used below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses of the Statement and the independently cited external contracts.

[F1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice; in particular its countable and dependent instances are available.

[F2]

Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach gives the complex Banach endpoints and weak-derivative norms on any open set. Since W1,q↪Lq continuously, both form a compatible couple in Lq.

[F3]

A single collar-reflection and free-tail exterior extension gives one E on the endpoint sum with PE=I and bounds at both endpoints. Restriction P is contractive on both weak-derivative endpoints.

[F5]

Reference 0, Definition 3.1 (PDF p.15), defines Λz=F−1(1+4π2∣ξ∣2)−z/2F. Remark 3.2 (PDF pp.15–16) states that this is a well-defined linear map on tempered distributions: the multiplier is smooth with polynomially bounded derivatives, and the Fourier transform and its inverse act on S′. Definition 3.3 and Theorem 3.7 (PDF pp.16–17) give Hs,q(Rn)={f:Λ−sf∈Lq}=[Lq,W1,q]s with equivalent norms when 1<q<∞, 0<s<1. Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11, gives [Lp0(X0),Lp1(X1)]s=Lp([X0,X1]s) for finite endpoint exponents with 1/p=(1−s)/p0+s/p1. Only the equal exponent case p0=p1=p is used below.

[F6]

Strongly measurable Banach-valued function defines strong measurability for real or complex Banach values by almost-everywhere norm limits of measurable simple functions, unchanged by modifying a representative on a null set.

[F7]

Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space defines the Bochner Lp norm on strongly measurable almost-everywhere classes and proves completeness on (0,T) for real Banach values, 0<T<∞, 1≤p<∞, under Countable Choice. Realification preserves a complex norm and its metric preserves the norm and metric upon forgetting complex scalars; thus the realification of a complex Banach space is real Banach. AC supplies the Countable Choice used by this completeness theorem.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the conclusions in the statement under its stated hypotheses.

1.1F2F3F4F5given

Let Yj be the whole-space endpoints Lq(Rn),W1,q(Rn). Apply the strip operator theorem to P:Yj→Xj and the same E:Xj→Yj. The whole-space Bessel input identifies Ys=[Y0,Y1]s with Hs,q, so P:Ys→Xs and E:Xs→Ys are bounded, PE=I, and PYs=Xs. This proves the set equality with restriction classes rather than choosing an independent fractional extension.

1.2F2F3F6algebra

For a bounded linear spatial map A:Z→Z′ between the Banach spaces in question and a strongly measurable f, F6 supplies measurable simple approximants converging almost everywhere in norm. Their images under A are measurable simple functions converging to Af. Thus Af is strongly measurable, independent of null-set representatives, and ∥Af∥Lp(Z′)≤∥A∥∥f∥Lp(Z). This applies to the common endpoint maps E,P and to the spatial inclusions X1↪X0, Y1↪Y0.

1.3F1F2F6F7algebra

Apply F7 to the realification of each Xj,Yj. Its simple functions, null-set classes, norm and metric are unchanged by realification, so its strong measurability and Bochner Lp space are the same sets with the same norm as for complex values. The real completeness theorem therefore proves metric completeness of the complex Bochner spaces. Complex scalar multiplication on classes obeys ∥λf∥Lp=∣λ∣∥f∥Lp, directly from the spatial norm and integral, so these are complex Banach spaces. AC supplies the theorem's Countable Choice hypothesis.

2.1F2F4F5step 1.1algebra

In the interpolation norm let CP,CE be these bounds, including the Bessel norm equivalences. If Pf=u, then ∥u∥Xs≤CP∥f∥Hs,q. Conversely Eu extends u and ∥Eu∥Hs,q≤CE∥u∥Xs. Taking the infimum over extensions gives CP−1∥u∥Xs≤∥u∥quot≤CE∥u∥Xs. Since Xs continuously injects into X0=Lq(Ω), P:Hs,q→Lq(Ω) is continuous. Its kernel is closed. The quotient theorem makes the quotient norm definite and complete, proving its well-definedness.

3.1F2F3F4F5step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra∎

The spatial inequalities ∥u∥X0≤∥u∥X1 and ∥v∥Y0≤∥v∥Y1 integrate to continuous injective embeddings Lp(0,T;X1)↪Lp(0,T;X0) and Lp(0,T;Y1)↪Lp(0,T;Y0). Injectivity follows because zero in the larger spatial space is zero in the smaller one at each time outside a null set. Each pair is consequently a compatible complex Banach couple in its zeroth endpoint, a Hausdorff normed space. The time-valued E,P are single complex-linear maps on these endpoint sums, with the endpoint bounds from step 1.2 and PE=I inherited almost everywhere from the spatial identity. The strip theorem therefore applies. Example 2.7(i), with the same finite exponent p at both endpoints on (0,T), identifies the two interpolated time spaces with Lp(0,T;Xs) and Lp(0,T;Ys). Together with step 1.1 this gives the displayed Bochner identity and the claimed bounded retraction maps, including PE=I, on the interpolated time spaces.

Source notes

All Bochner assertions use Example2.7(i), PDF p.11, not the later occurrence in a different proof on p.23. There is no identification with Slobodeckij spaces for q unequal to2 and no p=∞ time assertion.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

J. C. Bellido and G. García-Sáez, Bessel Potential Spaces and Complex Interpolation: Continuous embeddings, arXiv:2503.04310v6 · Compatible couples and sums: PDF pp.4–6; §2.2, PDF pp.9–10 (strip definition, Banach property and exact operator bound); Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11 (Bochner interpolation); Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2, PDF pp.15–16 (tempered-distribution multiplier and well-definedness); Definitions 3.3, 3.6 and Theorem 3.7, PDF pp.16–17 (Bessel space and identity).

For compatible complex Banach couples the strip class F with the maximum boundary norm is Banach, evaluation at an interior strip point is continuous into the sum, and complex interpolation is exact of exponent theta. Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2 define the Bessel multiplier as a well-defined linear operator on tempered distributions. For 1<q<infinity and 0<s<1, [Lq(Rn),W1q(Rn)]_s is the Bessel-potential space {f in S prime: F inverse((1+4 pi squared |xi| squared)^(s/2) Ff) in Lq}, with equivalent norms. Example 2.7(i) states [Lp0(E0),Lp1(E1)]_theta=Lp(theta)([E0,E1]_theta) for 1<=p0,p1<infinity.

Hypotheses: Complex Banach spaces continuously embedded into a common Hausdorff topological vector space; common bounded endpoint operator on their sum; 0<theta<1. The whole-space Sobolev assertion requires 1<q<infinity. Bochner identity uses the same Lebesgue measure space at both endpoints and finite 1<=p0,p1<infinity; here use (0,T) and p0=p1=p.

Reading limits: Checked the cited compatible-couple and strip-theorem passages in v6 PDF pp.4–6,9–11, and the definitions and Theorem 3.7 statement on pp.15–17, including Remark 3.2 on pp.15–16. Example 2.7(i), p.11, is the Bochner contract. Theorem 3.7's proof, Mihlin's theorem and the original interpolation books were not reconstructed. No exterior extension theorem is imported; the exterior operator is supplied locally.

Sources