How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Restriction quotient and Bochner interpolation for the exterior extension
Statement
Assume AC, , , and . Let and for a smooth exterior domain, and let be the single extension in A single collar-reflection and free-tail exterior extension. Put and Then equals the restriction quotient with equivalent norms. Its quotient kernel is closed and the quotient is Banach. Moreover with the Bochner convention of strongly measurable almost-everywhere classes. The pointwise maps and are well-defined bounded maps on the corresponding Bochner endpoint and interpolated spaces, and there.
External input
Reference 0, Definition 3.1 (PDF p.15), defines . Remark 3.2 (PDF pp.15–16) states that this is a well-defined linear map on tempered distributions: the multiplier is smooth with polynomially bounded derivatives, and the Fourier transform and its inverse act on . Definition 3.3 and Theorem 3.7 (PDF pp.16–17) give with equivalent norms when , . Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11, gives for finite endpoint exponents with . Only the equal exponent case is used below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses of the Statement and the independently cited external contracts.
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice; in particular its countable and dependent instances are available.
Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach gives the complex Banach endpoints and weak-derivative norms on any open set. Since continuously, both form a compatible couple in .
A single collar-reflection and free-tail exterior extension gives one on the endpoint sum with and bounds at both endpoints. Restriction is contractive on both weak-derivative endpoints.
Well-defined strip norm and the action of a common endpoint operator interpolates these same maps, and A quotient of a Banach space by a closed subspace is Banach makes a quotient by a closed kernel Banach.
Reference 0, Definition 3.1 (PDF p.15), defines . Remark 3.2 (PDF pp.15–16) states that this is a well-defined linear map on tempered distributions: the multiplier is smooth with polynomially bounded derivatives, and the Fourier transform and its inverse act on . Definition 3.3 and Theorem 3.7 (PDF pp.16–17) give with equivalent norms when , . Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11, gives for finite endpoint exponents with . Only the equal exponent case is used below.
Strongly measurable Banach-valued function defines strong measurability for real or complex Banach values by almost-everywhere norm limits of measurable simple functions, unchanged by modifying a representative on a null set.
Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space defines the Bochner norm on strongly measurable almost-everywhere classes and proves completeness on for real Banach values, , , under Countable Choice. Realification preserves a complex norm and its metric preserves the norm and metric upon forgetting complex scalars; thus the realification of a complex Banach space is real Banach. AC supplies the Countable Choice used by this completeness theorem.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and data in the Statement.
Goal: Prove the conclusions in the statement under its stated hypotheses.
Let be the whole-space endpoints . Apply the strip operator theorem to and the same . The whole-space Bessel input identifies with , so and are bounded, , and . This proves the set equality with restriction classes rather than choosing an independent fractional extension.
For a bounded linear spatial map between the Banach spaces in question and a strongly measurable , F6 supplies measurable simple approximants converging almost everywhere in norm. Their images under are measurable simple functions converging to . Thus is strongly measurable, independent of null-set representatives, and . This applies to the common endpoint maps and to the spatial inclusions , .
Apply F7 to the realification of each . Its simple functions, null-set classes, norm and metric are unchanged by realification, so its strong measurability and Bochner space are the same sets with the same norm as for complex values. The real completeness theorem therefore proves metric completeness of the complex Bochner spaces. Complex scalar multiplication on classes obeys , directly from the spatial norm and integral, so these are complex Banach spaces. AC supplies the theorem's Countable Choice hypothesis.
In the interpolation norm let be these bounds, including the Bessel norm equivalences. If , then . Conversely extends and . Taking the infimum over extensions gives . Since continuously injects into , is continuous. Its kernel is closed. The quotient theorem makes the quotient norm definite and complete, proving its well-definedness.
The spatial inequalities and integrate to continuous injective embeddings and . Injectivity follows because zero in the larger spatial space is zero in the smaller one at each time outside a null set. Each pair is consequently a compatible complex Banach couple in its zeroth endpoint, a Hausdorff normed space. The time-valued are single complex-linear maps on these endpoint sums, with the endpoint bounds from step 1.2 and inherited almost everywhere from the spatial identity. The strip theorem therefore applies. Example 2.7(i), with the same finite exponent at both endpoints on , identifies the two interpolated time spaces with and . Together with step 1.1 this gives the displayed Bochner identity and the claimed bounded retraction maps, including , on the interpolated time spaces.
Source notes
All Bochner assertions use Example2.7(i), PDF p.11, not the later occurrence in a different proof on p.23. There is no identification with Slobodeckij spaces for q unequal to2 and no p=∞ time assertion.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach
- A single collar-reflection and free-tail exterior extension
- Well-defined strip norm and the action of a common endpoint operator
- A quotient of a Banach space by a closed subspace is Banach
- Strongly measurable Banach-valued function
- Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space
- Realification preserves a complex norm and its metric
- J. C. Bellido and G. García-Sáez, Bessel Potential Spaces and Complex Interpolation: Continuous embeddings, arXiv:2503.04310v6 · Compatible couples and sums: PDF pp.4–6; §2.2, PDF pp.9–10 (strip definition, Banach property and exact operator bound); Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11 (Bochner interpolation); Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2, PDF pp.15–16 (tempered-distribution multiplier and well-definedness); Definitions 3.3, 3.6 and Theorem 3.7, PDF pp.16–17 (Bessel space and identity).
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For compatible complex Banach couples the strip class F with the maximum boundary norm is Banach, evaluation at an interior strip point is continuous into the sum, and complex interpolation is exact of exponent theta. Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2 define the Bessel multiplier as a well-defined linear operator on tempered distributions. For 1<q<infinity and 0<s<1, [Lq(Rn),W1q(Rn)]_s is the Bessel-potential space {f in S prime: F inverse((1+4 pi squared |xi| squared)^(s/2) Ff) in Lq}, with equivalent norms. Example 2.7(i) states [Lp0(E0),Lp1(E1)]_theta=Lp(theta)([E0,E1]_theta) for 1<=p0,p1<infinity.
Hypotheses: Complex Banach spaces continuously embedded into a common Hausdorff topological vector space; common bounded endpoint operator on their sum; 0<theta<1. The whole-space Sobolev assertion requires 1<q<infinity. Bochner identity uses the same Lebesgue measure space at both endpoints and finite 1<=p0,p1<infinity; here use (0,T) and p0=p1=p.
Reading limits: Checked the cited compatible-couple and strip-theorem passages in v6 PDF pp.4–6,9–11, and the definitions and Theorem 3.7 statement on pp.15–17, including Remark 3.2 on pp.15–16. Example 2.7(i), p.11, is the Bochner contract. Theorem 3.7's proof, Mihlin's theorem and the original interpolation books were not reconstructed. No exterior extension theorem is imported; the exterior operator is supplied locally.
Sources
- J. C. Bellido and G. García-Sáez, Bessel Potential Spaces and Complex Interpolation: Continuous embeddings, arXiv:2503.04310v6 · Compatible couples and sums: PDF pp.4–6; §2.2, PDF pp.9–10 (strip definition, Banach property and exact operator bound); Example 2.7(i), PDF p.11 (Bochner interpolation); Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2, PDF pp.15–16 (tempered-distribution multiplier and well-definedness); Definitions 3.3, 3.6 and Theorem 3.7, PDF pp.16–17 (Bessel space and identity).